BP
Price
$42.66
Change
-$0.27 (-0.63%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
111.86B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SU
Price
$64.87
Change
+$0.99 (+1.55%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
74.8B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BP vs SU

BP vs SU Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? BP plc (BP) vs. Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BP plc (BP) and Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) are both major energy producers benefiting from elevated oil prices in recent market activity.
  • BP reported expectations for stronger upstream margins and trading results in its Q2 2026 trading statement, despite lower production volumes.
  • SU is positioned for significant year-over-year EPS growth in its upcoming Q2 2026 earnings release, supported by oil sands operations.
  • Both stocks have delivered strong year-to-date gains amid the energy sector rally, with BP showing notable volatility tied to global crude benchmarks.
  • BP offers broader integrated operations across refining and renewables, while SU maintains a more concentrated focus on upstream Canadian production.
  • Market sentiment for both remains constructive, influenced by commodity price trends rather than company-specific catalysts alone.

Introduction

BP plc (BP) and Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) represent two prominent players in the global energy sector, making them relevant for comparison among investors seeking exposure to oil and gas markets. This analysis examines their recent performance, business models, and positioning in the current environment of fluctuating commodity prices. Institutional and retail traders focused on sector rotation, relative value, or energy-specific momentum may find the comparison useful for portfolio construction and risk assessment. The review draws on verifiable market data and company disclosures to highlight observable differences without forward-looking speculation.

BP Overview and Recent Performance

BP plc (BP) is an integrated energy company engaged in exploration, production, refining, and marketing of oil, gas, and related products. In recent weeks, the stock has shown resilience amid higher global crude prices, closing at $45.22 on July 31, 2026, following a 2.26% single-day gain. Year-to-date returns have exceeded 33%, outperforming broader equity benchmarks. The company’s July 14, 2026 trading statement highlighted expectations for improved oil and gas realizations, robust trading results, and higher refining margins in the second quarter, partially offset by lower upstream output and a $1 billion impairment charge primarily in transition-related assets. These factors contributed to positive sentiment in the period, with shares trading within a 52-week range of approximately $31.59 to $48.27.

SU Overview and Recent Performance

Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) operates primarily as a Canadian integrated energy firm with significant upstream production from oil sands assets, along with refining and marketing operations. Recent market activity has reflected broader energy sector strength, with the stock trading near $66.73 in late July 2026. Analysts project a substantial year-over-year increase in second-quarter earnings per share to $2.14, with results scheduled for release on August 4, 2026. The company’s production profile and exposure to Western Canadian Select pricing have supported relative stability during periods of elevated benchmark crude. Over the past year, SU has demonstrated competitive total returns within the integrated energy peer group, consistent with commodity-driven price behavior observed across the sector in recent months.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated selection of AI trading bots designed to execute strategies across thousands of tickers. Hundreds of such bots are available on the platform, each employing distinct trading styles, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only the highest-ranked and most suitable for prevailing market conditions are featured in the Trending AI Robots section, currently highlighting 30 bots selected from a total of 298. These bots offer reported performance metrics including annualized returns up to +241% and win rates in the 70–80% range in certain strategies, along with statistics such as Sharpe ratios, profit factors, and drawdown measures. All bots differ in their approach to pattern recognition, momentum, and risk management. Review the full range of available statistics to identify bots aligned with individual objectives.

Head-to-Head Comparison

BP plc (BP) operates a diversified global portfolio spanning upstream exploration, downstream refining, and select low-carbon initiatives, providing exposure to multiple segments of the energy value chain. In contrast, Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) maintains a more focused upstream emphasis on oil sands production in Canada, with integrated refining capacity. Recent momentum for both has been supported by higher oil prices, though BP’s trading statement noted production declines while SU anticipates stronger earnings growth. Risk factors differ: BP faces transition-related impairments and global operational complexity, whereas SU contends with regional pricing differentials and regulatory considerations in Canadian energy markets. Sector exposure remains similar, yet BP offers greater geographic diversification. Market sentiment reflects commodity trends for both, with limited differentiation in analyst revisions during the recent period.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency amid the energy price environment, relative stability in reported metrics, and positioning ahead of earnings releases, Tickeron’s AI models currently indicate a probabilistic preference for Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) in this pairing. This assessment incorporates factors including earnings growth projections and sector-specific momentum, while acknowledging variability in commodity-driven outcomes. Such indications are derived from quantitative analysis and should be viewed as informational rather than definitive guidance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BP vs. SU commentary
Aug 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BP is a StrongBuy and SU is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2026
Stock price -- (BP: $42.93 vs. SU: $63.88)
Brand notoriety: BP and SU are both notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BP: 63% vs. SU: 75%
Market capitalization -- BP: $111.86B vs. SU: $74.8B
BP [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $111.86B. SU’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $74.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $656.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $119.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSU’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SU is a better buy in the long-term than BP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SU is a better buy in the short-term than BP.

Price Growth

BP (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +4.17% price change this week, while SU (@Integrated Oil) price change was +1.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +3.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

BP is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

SU is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+3.40% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BP($112B) has a higher market cap than SU($74.8B). BP has higher P/E ratio than SU: BP (20.51) vs SU (11.88). SU YTD gains are higher at: 44.004 vs. BP (26.646). BP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35B vs. SU (16.2B). BP has more cash in the bank: 35.8B vs. SU (3.27B). SU has less debt than BP: SU (14.8B) vs BP (74.2B). BP has higher revenues than SU: BP (195B) vs SU (54.5B).
BPSUBP / SU
Capitalization112B74.8B150%
EBITDA35B16.2B216%
Gain YTD26.64644.00461%
P/E Ratio20.5111.88173%
Revenue195B54.5B358%
Total Cash35.8B3.27B1,094%
Total Debt74.2B14.8B501%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BP vs SU: Fundamental Ratings
BP
SU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2168
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2115
SMR RATING
1..100
8460
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10049
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BP's Valuation (26) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (31). This means that BP’s stock grew similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.

SU's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BP (21). This means that SU’s stock grew similarly to BP’s over the last 12 months.

SU's SMR Rating (60) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BP (84). This means that SU’s stock grew similarly to BP’s over the last 12 months.

SU's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BP (45). This means that SU’s stock grew similarly to BP’s over the last 12 months.

SU's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BP (100). This means that SU’s stock grew somewhat faster than BP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPSU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TG8.080.18
+2.28%
Tredegar Corp
ALX272.080.81
+0.30%
Alexander's
DSGX77.62-1.56
-1.97%
Descartes Systems Group
TJX152.61-3.13
-2.01%
TJX Companies
TAOX3.48-0.14
-3.87%
Tao Synergies Inc

BP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BP has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BP jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BP
1D Price
Change %
BP100%
-0.53%
SHEL - BP
80%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
E - BP
77%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
EQNR - BP
77%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
CVE - BP
73%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
SU - BP
73%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
More

SU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SU has been closely correlated with CVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SU jumps, then CVE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SU
1D Price
Change %
SU100%
+0.95%
CVE - SU
82%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
IMO - SU
81%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
BP - SU
73%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
EQNR - SU
71%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
CRGY - SU
71%
Closely correlated
-2.90%
More