Advertisement
CRWD vs TENB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) vs. Tenable Holdings (TENB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CRWD has demonstrated stronger recent momentum, reaching new 52-week highs amid AI-driven security demand, while TENB trades well below its prior peaks despite solid fundamentals.
- Both companies operate in the cybersecurity sector, with CRWD focusing on endpoint protection and cloud security and TENB specializing in vulnerability management and exposure assessment.
- Revenue growth for CRWD has outpaced TENB in recent periods, supported by higher annual recurring revenue expansion and positive analyst sentiment ahead of earnings.
- TENB offers a more modest valuation multiple relative to peers, potentially appealing to value-oriented investors, though it faces slower top-line expansion.
- Market sentiment has favored CRWD in recent weeks due to AI integration catalysts, contrasting with TENB’s mixed post-earnings reaction earlier in the quarter.
- Relative performance highlights a trade-off between CRWD’s growth trajectory and TENB’s emphasis on profitability improvements and niche positioning.
Introduction
CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) and Tenable Holdings (TENB) represent two established players in the cybersecurity industry, making them relevant for comparison among investors seeking exposure to digital defense solutions. This analysis examines their business models, recent stock behavior, and relative positioning in the current market environment. Traders and long-term investors focused on the technology sector, particularly those evaluating growth versus value dynamics within cybersecurity, may find this comparison useful for assessing diversification opportunities or sector allocation decisions.
CRWD Overview and Recent Performance
CrowdStrike Holdings delivers cloud-native endpoint security, threat intelligence, and AI-powered protection platforms to enterprises worldwide. In recent market activity, CRWD shares have shown notable strength, climbing to fresh 52-week highs near $731 amid broad investor interest in artificial intelligence applications for security. Performance over recent weeks reflects upward momentum, with the stock posting substantial gains on a monthly and year-to-date basis. Key influences include analyst price target increases ahead of the company’s upcoming quarterly results and continued expansion of its annual recurring revenue base, which surpassed $5 billion earlier in the year. Sentiment has remained constructive, supported by product innovations and demand for advanced threat detection capabilities.
TENB Overview and Recent Performance
Tenable Holdings provides exposure management and vulnerability assessment solutions designed to help organizations identify, prioritize, and remediate cyber risks across hybrid environments. In recent market activity, TENB shares have experienced volatility, trading near $28 following its first-quarter results that featured revenue of $262.1 million and an earnings beat. The stock remains significantly below its 52-week high, reflecting tempered investor response despite operational improvements such as margin expansion. Recent performance has been influenced by the company’s focus on transitioning toward AI-enhanced offerings and efforts to scale beyond the $1 billion revenue threshold, though top-line growth has moderated compared with some peers. Overall sentiment appears balanced, with emphasis on execution and profitability metrics.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing automated trading strategies from a broader library of hundreds of AI trading bots that execute trades across thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent risk-adjusted returns, and robust statistical profiles earn placement in this trending section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, including varying win rates, average returns per trade, and drawdown profiles that cater to diverse investor preferences. This curated approach allows users to explore data-driven options suited to current conditions. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed metrics and backtested results.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CRWD and TENB serve the cybersecurity sector but differ in scope: CRWD emphasizes comprehensive endpoint and cloud workload protection with a broad platform approach, whereas TENB concentrates on continuous exposure management and vulnerability prioritization. Growth drivers favor CRWD, which has sustained higher revenue expansion and larger annual recurring revenue gains, while TENB has prioritized margin improvement and operational efficiency. Recent momentum has tilted toward CRWD, evidenced by its advance to record highs, compared with TENB’s more subdued price action. Risk factors include valuation multiples for CRWD that reflect premium expectations versus TENB’s lower market capitalization and potentially greater sensitivity to sector-wide spending patterns. Market sentiment currently reflects stronger conviction in CRWD’s AI-related catalysts, creating a contrast in perceived positioning within the same industry vertical.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative momentum, and positioning ahead of near-term catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to CRWD over TENB. Stronger recent price behavior, elevated analyst attention, and broader platform growth metrics contribute to this assessment, though outcomes remain subject to earnings results and evolving market conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWD is a Buy and TENB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTENB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TENB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TENB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TENB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +1.76% price change this week, while TENB (@Computer Communications) price change was -3.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.28%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
TENB is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-1.12% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CRWD | TENB | CRWD / TENB | |
| Capitalization | 174B | 2.96B | 5,888% |
| EBITDA | 329M | 71.6M | 459% |
| Gain YTD | 45.661 | 13.897 | 329% |
| P/E Ratio | 765.02 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 5.09B | 1.02B | 498% |
| Total Cash | 4.55B | 360M | 1,265% |
| Total Debt | 821M | 419M | 196% |
CRWD | TENB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TENB's Valuation (53) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that TENB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TENB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew significantly faster than TENB’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as TENB (93) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to TENB’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as TENB (42) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to TENB’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TENB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew somewhat faster than TENB’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | TENB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 7 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
CRWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 100% | -1.26% | ||
| PANW - CRWD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| NOW - CRWD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| OKTA - CRWD | 67% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| ZS - CRWD | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.70% | ||
| HUBS - CRWD | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||
TENB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TENB has been loosely correlated with OKTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TENB jumps, then OKTA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TENB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TENB | 100% | -0.26% | ||
| OKTA - TENB | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| CRWD - TENB | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| QLYS - TENB | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| BOX - TENB | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| RPD - TENB | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
More | ||||