Advertisement
S vs TENB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? SentinelOne (S) vs. Tenable Holdings (TENB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- SentinelOne (S) and Tenable Holdings (TENB) are both cybersecurity firms focused on endpoint protection and vulnerability management, respectively, operating in a sector driven by rising cyber threats and AI integration.
- Recent market activity shows S achieving full-year operating profitability and surpassing $1 billion in annualized recurring revenue (ARR), while TENB delivered revenue growth of 9.6% year-over-year in its latest quarter with an earnings beat.
- Stock performance in recent weeks reflects contrasting momentum, with TENB posting notable gains amid positive earnings reactions and S demonstrating resilience following earlier volatility tied to competitive pressures.
- Both companies benefit from broader sector tailwinds but face trade-offs in growth rates, with S emphasizing AI-native platform expansion and TENB highlighting exposure management stability.
- Market sentiment remains cautious overall due to macroeconomic factors and competition, positioning these stocks as relevant for investors seeking exposure to cybersecurity innovation and relative value opportunities.
Introduction
SentinelOne (S) and Tenable Holdings (TENB) represent two established players in the cybersecurity industry, each addressing distinct yet complementary aspects of enterprise security needs. This comparison examines their business models, recent financial performance, and market positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating relative opportunities within the sector. The analysis draws on observable trends from the past several weeks alongside broader context, providing a neutral framework for those focused on growth-oriented technology equities or defensive plays in digital risk management.
S Overview and Recent Performance
SentinelOne, Inc. develops an AI-powered cybersecurity platform centered on endpoint detection and response (EDR), extended detection and response (XDR), and cloud security solutions. In recent market activity, the stock has shown recovery following periods of volatility influenced by competitive dynamics and guidance considerations. The company reported fiscal fourth-quarter results with revenue rising 20% year-over-year to $271 million and ARR advancing 22% to $1.119 billion, achieving full-year operating profitability. Additional developments, including new AI security offerings and partnerships, have supported sentiment by highlighting platform scalability amid ongoing demand for automated threat detection.
TENB Overview and Recent Performance
Tenable Holdings, Inc. specializes in vulnerability management and cyber exposure solutions, helping organizations measure and reduce cybersecurity risk across hybrid environments. Recent market activity indicates upward momentum, with the stock registering gains following its first-quarter earnings release. Revenue increased 9.6% year-over-year to $262.1 million, exceeding consensus estimates, while non-GAAP earnings per share surpassed projections. The company raised aspects of its full-year outlook, reflecting steady platform adoption and operational discipline, though growth rates remain more moderate compared to higher-velocity peers in the sector.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics tailored to prevailing market conditions. Only those demonstrating strong historical results, risk-adjusted returns, and suitability for current environments are featured in this section, with available statistics often including win rates, profit factors, and drawdown ranges that help users assess fit. All AI trading bots differ in their approaches, from momentum-based to mean-reversion tactics, allowing for diversified application across equities like those in cybersecurity. Explore the curated list for potential automated trading insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In business models, S emphasizes an integrated AI-native platform spanning endpoints to cloud, driving higher ARR growth potential, whereas TENB focuses on exposure management and vulnerability scanning with a more established customer base in compliance-heavy sectors. Growth drivers favor S through AI feature adoption and recent profitability milestones, while TENB benefits from predictable recurring revenue and recent earnings beats amid slower but steadier expansion. Recent momentum has tilted toward TENB with share price advances post-earnings, contrasting S’s more mixed trajectory influenced by sector-wide competition. Risk factors include execution on AI integration for both, with S carrying higher valuation sensitivity and TENB facing potential growth normalization. Sector exposure remains similar in cybersecurity, though market sentiment reflects cautious optimism tied to macroeconomic stability and threat landscape evolution.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent performance, earnings delivery, and positioning within growth catalysts, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to TENB for near-term stability, while acknowledging S’s stronger growth trajectory as a compelling alternative depending on risk tolerance and market conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is S is a Hold and TENB is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
S’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTENB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TENB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
S’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TENB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- S’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TENB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
S (@Computer Communications) experienced а -3.63% price change this week, while TENB (@Computer Communications) price change was -1.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -6.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
S is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
TENB is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-6.75% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| S | TENB | S / TENB | |
| Capitalization | 5.47B | 3.07B | 178% |
| EBITDA | -254.11M | 71.6M | -355% |
| Gain YTD | 6.333 | 18.360 | 34% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1B | 1.02B | 98% |
| Total Cash | 629M | 360M | 175% |
| Total Debt | 15M | 419M | 4% |
S | TENB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 25 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
S's Valuation (54) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as TENB (56) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to TENB’s over the last 12 months.
S's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as TENB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to TENB’s over the last 12 months.
TENB's SMR Rating (93) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as S (98) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that TENB’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.
TENB's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as S (48) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that TENB’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.
S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for TENB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that S’s stock grew significantly faster than TENB’s over the last 12 months.
| S | TENB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PMDE | 25.69 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December | |||
| DVAL | 15.43 | -0.05 | -0.35% |
| BrandywineGLOBAL Dyn US Lrg Cap Val ETF | |||
| XJH | 49.84 | -1.04 | -2.05% |
| iShares ESG Select Scrn S&P Mid-Cap ETF | |||
| FEBU | 29.45 | -0.62 | -2.07% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncFebETF | |||
| DCOR | 80.47 | -1.97 | -2.40% |
| Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF | |||
S and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if S jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
TENB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TENB has been loosely correlated with OKTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TENB jumps, then OKTA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TENB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TENB | 100% | -4.92% | ||
| OKTA - TENB | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.85% | ||
| CRWD - TENB | 63% Loosely correlated | -6.68% | ||
| QLYS - TENB | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| BOX - TENB | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| RPD - TENB | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.59% | ||
More | ||||