Advertisement
CSW vs GGG
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSW) vs. Graco Inc. (GGG) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSW) operates across three diversified industrial segments, while Graco Inc. (GGG) specializes in fluid handling equipment and systems.
- Recent market activity shows CSW maintaining stronger price momentum compared to GGG, which has experienced notable declines over the past month.
- Both companies serve industrial end-markets with exposure to construction, manufacturing, and infrastructure spending trends.
- Sector positioning favors CSW’s broader product mix for potential resilience, whereas GGG’s focused technology platform supports targeted applications in fluid management.
- Market sentiment reflects contrasting relative performance, with CSW benefiting from post-listing visibility and GGG navigating broader industrial cyclical pressures.
- Investors comparing these names often weigh CSW’s growth-oriented diversification against GGG’s established global distribution and steady cash flow generation.
Introduction
This comparison examines CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSW) and Graco Inc. (GGG), two industrials-sector equities with distinct business profiles yet overlapping exposure to capital spending cycles. Professional traders and long-term investors seeking to assess relative performance, sector positioning, and risk-return trade-offs in the current market environment may find the analysis relevant. The review highlights observable differences in business models, recent price behavior, and sentiment drivers without offering directional forecasts.
CSW Overview and Recent Performance
CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSW) is a diversified industrial growth company headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with operations segmented into Contractor Solutions, Engineered Building Solutions, and Specialized Reliability Solutions. The company focuses on niche, value-added products serving construction, industrial, and infrastructure markets. Recent market activity indicates CSW has demonstrated notable price appreciation and resilience amid broader sector movements, supported by its relatively recent NYSE listing and ongoing execution of growth initiatives. Sentiment has been influenced by corporate developments such as executive promotions tied to long-term strategy, contributing to sustained investor interest in the name’s positioning within the industrials space.
GGG Overview and Recent Performance
Graco Inc. (GGG) designs, manufactures, and markets equipment and systems used to move, measure, control, dispense, and spray fluids and powders across industrial and commercial applications worldwide. The company maintains a focused technology platform with global distribution channels serving manufacturing, construction, and automotive end-markets. Recent market activity shows GGG experiencing downward price pressure, including declines over the past month, amid typical cyclical influences in industrial equipment demand. Sentiment reflects these movements alongside broader comparisons to market benchmarks, with the stock navigating periods of relative underperformance against the S&P 500.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in the trending section. Available bots exhibit a wide range of historical win rates, risk-adjusted returns, and drawdown profiles, allowing users to match specific styles to their objectives. The section provides an informational overview of these tools for market participants interested in algorithmic approaches.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSW) and Graco Inc. (GGG) both operate in the industrials sector but differ in business model scope. CSW offers diversified exposure across multiple industrial niches, potentially providing broader resilience to varying demand patterns, while GGG concentrates on specialized fluid-handling technology, which can deliver higher margins in targeted applications yet may face greater cyclical volatility. Recent momentum favors CSW’s price trajectory relative to GGG’s more pronounced declines. Risk factors include CSW’s shorter public trading history versus GGG’s established global scale and dividend history. Market sentiment currently highlights CSW’s post-listing visibility against GGG’s positioning amid industrial equipment sector pressures, creating clear trade-offs for investors evaluating sector allocation and growth versus stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSW) over Graco Inc. (GGG). The assessment considers CSW’s demonstrated price resilience and diversified segment exposure as supportive of steadier momentum compared with GGG’s recent declines. This view remains probabilistic and subject to evolving data rather than a definitive recommendation.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSW is a StrongBuy and GGG is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGGG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CSW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GGG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GGG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CSW (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +0.62% price change this week, while GGG (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +0.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.98%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSW is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
GGG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (+2.00% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| CSW | GGG | CSW / GGG | |
| Capitalization | 4.48B | 12.5B | 36% |
| EBITDA | 235M | 744M | 32% |
| Gain YTD | -6.344 | -7.257 | 87% |
| P/E Ratio | 40.95 | 24.68 | 166% |
| Revenue | 1.08B | 2.25B | 48% |
| Total Cash | 33.8M | 712M | 5% |
| Total Debt | 945M | 52.9M | 1,786% |
CSW | GGG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GGG's Valuation (25) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSW (77) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that GGG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSW’s over the last 12 months.
CSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as GGG (83) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CSW’s stock grew similarly to GGG’s over the last 12 months.
GGG's SMR Rating (46) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as CSW (70) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that GGG’s stock grew similarly to CSW’s over the last 12 months.
CSW's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as GGG (60) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CSW’s stock grew similarly to GGG’s over the last 12 months.
CSW's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGG (70) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGG’s over the last 12 months.
| CSW | GGG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 70% | 8 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 58% | 23 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 52% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ETHE | 14.01 | 0.22 | +1.60% |
| Grayscale Ethereum Staking ETF | |||
| MMU | 10.43 | 0.05 | +0.48% |
| Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund | |||
| FLEE | 39.29 | 0.06 | +0.15% |
| Franklin FTSE Europe ETF | |||
| SCMC | 25.06 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| Sterling Capital Multi-Strat Inc ETF | |||
| XTR | 28.41 | -0.12 | -0.42% |
| Global X S&P 500® Tail Risk ETF | |||
CSW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSW has been loosely correlated with DOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSW jumps, then DOV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSW | 100% | -1.99% | ||
| DOV - CSW | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.61% | ||
| ATMU - CSW | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| NDSN - CSW | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| GGG - CSW | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| RBC - CSW | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
More | ||||
GGG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGG has been closely correlated with LECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGG jumps, then LECO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GGG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGG | 100% | -0.68% | ||
| LECO - GGG | 74% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| ITW - GGG | 73% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| AOS - GGG | 72% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| NDSN - GGG | 72% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| ROP - GGG | 72% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
More | ||||