CWST
Price
$89.91
Change
-$0.03 (-0.03%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
5.72B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LNZA
Price
$6.11
Change
+$0.23 (+3.91%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
79.97M
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWST vs LNZA

CWST vs LNZA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWST vs. LNZA commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWST is a StrongBuy and LNZA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWST($5.72B) has a higher market cap than LNZA($80M). CWST has higher P/E ratio than LNZA: CWST (1123.88) vs LNZA (0.31). CWST YTD gains are higher at: -8.199 vs. LNZA (-55.596). CWST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 396M vs. LNZA (-31.25M). LNZA has more cash in the bank: 45M vs. CWST (25.5M). LNZA has less debt than CWST: LNZA (28.8M) vs CWST (1.45B). CWST has higher revenues than LNZA: CWST (1.96B) vs LNZA (58.3M).
CWSTLNZACWST / LNZA
Capitalization5.72B80M7,153%
EBITDA396M-31.25M-1,267%
Gain YTD-8.199-55.59615%
P/E Ratio1123.880.31361,811%
Revenue1.96B58.3M3,353%
Total Cash25.5M45M57%
Total Debt1.45B28.8M5,017%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWST: Fundamental Ratings
CWST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWSTLNZA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 12, 2026
Stock price -- (CWST: $89.91 vs. LNZA: $6.11)
Brand notoriety: CWST and LNZA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWST: 103% vs. LNZA: 75%
Market capitalization -- CWST: $5.72B vs. LNZA: $79.97M
CWST [@Environmental Services] is valued at $5.72B. LNZA’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $79.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $14.5K to $85.32B. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $11.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while LNZA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CWST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LNZA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LNZA is a better buy in the long-term than CWST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWST’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNZA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LNZA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNZA is a better buy in the short-term than CWST.

Price Growth

CWST (@Environmental Services) experienced а -3.87% price change this week, while LNZA (@Environmental Services) price change was -0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWST is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

LNZA is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-2.92% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CWST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LNZA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DMXF85.990.87
+1.02%
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
NDEC30.580.16
+0.54%
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Dec
VTEB48.430.17
+0.35%
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
HDLB16.75N/A
N/A
ETRACS Mny Py 2xLgd US Hg Dv Lw Vl ETN B
BKFI23.14-0.08
-0.34%
BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF

CWST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWST has been loosely correlated with WM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWST jumps, then WM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWST
1D Price
Change %
CWST100%
-0.03%
WM - CWST
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
RSG - CWST
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
GFL - CWST
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.93%
CLH - CWST
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
GWAV - CWST
9%
Poorly correlated
-15.74%
More

LNZA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNZA has been closely correlated with APACU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNZA jumps, then APACU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNZA
1D Price
Change %
LNZA100%
+3.91%
APACU - LNZA
72%
Closely correlated
N/A
BPACU - LNZA
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PESI - LNZA
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.85%
NVRI - LNZA
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
CWST - LNZA
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
More