CXM
Price
$6.88
Change
-$0.05 (-0.72%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.61B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WK
Price
$69.10
Change
+$1.78 (+2.64%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.76B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXM vs WK

CXM vs WK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXM vs. WK commentary
Aug 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Buy and WK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2026
Stock price -- (CXM: $6.87 vs. WK: $69.05)
Brand notoriety: CXM and WK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXM: 50% vs. WK: 91%
Market capitalization -- CXM: $1.61B vs. WK: $3.76B
CXM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.61B. WK’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $239.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXM is a better buy in the long-term than WK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WK is a better buy in the short-term than CXM.

Price Growth

CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.00% price change this week, while WK (@Packaged Software) price change was +12.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXM is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.

WK is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.31% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WK($3.76B) has a higher market cap than CXM($1.61B). WK has higher P/E ratio than CXM: WK (82.20) vs CXM (57.25). CXM YTD gains are higher at: -10.925 vs. WK (-21.948). CXM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 71.1M vs. WK (41M). WK has more cash in the bank: 863M vs. CXM (443M). CXM has less debt than WK: CXM (43.8M) vs WK (793M). WK has higher revenues than CXM: WK (926M) vs CXM (871M).
CXMWKCXM / WK
Capitalization1.61B3.76B43%
EBITDA71.1M41M173%
Gain YTD-10.925-21.94850%
P/E Ratio57.2582.2070%
Revenue871M926M94%
Total Cash443M863M51%
Total Debt43.8M793M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WK: Fundamental Ratings
WK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
48
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMWK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLTY21.32-0.07
-0.31%
YieldMaxTM Ultra Short Opt Inc Strat ETF
GJR24.72-0.08
-0.32%
Synthetic Fixed Income Securities
VXX20.21-0.11
-0.54%
iPath® B S&P 500® VIX S/T Futs™ ETN
EGGQ50.27-1.31
-2.54%
NestYield Visionary ETF
KORU16.41-0.95
-5.47%
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X ETF

CXM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXM
1D Price
Change %
CXM100%
+1.02%
FRSH - CXM
71%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
BL - CXM
68%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
ASAN - CXM
67%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
CRM - CXM
66%
Closely correlated
+2.47%
TEAM - CXM
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
More

WK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WK has been loosely correlated with PCOR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WK jumps, then PCOR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WK
1D Price
Change %
WK100%
+3.35%
PCOR - WK
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.98%
CXM - WK
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
ASAN - WK
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
GWRE - WK
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
COIN - WK
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.20%
More