FRSH
Price
$11.80
Change
-$0.12 (-1.01%)
Updated
Sep 10, 12:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.11B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WK
Price
$72.76
Change
-$0.95 (-1.29%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
3.96B
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRSH vs WK

FRSH vs WK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSH vs. WK commentary
Sep 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Buy and WK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 10, 2026
Stock price -- (FRSH: $11.93 vs. WK: $72.76)
Brand notoriety: FRSH and WK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSH: 23% vs. WK: 117%
Market capitalization -- FRSH: $3.11B vs. WK: $3.96B
FRSH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.11B. WK’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $243.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the long-term than WK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the short-term than WK.

Price Growth

FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.55% price change this week, while WK (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -5.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRSH is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

WK is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-5.60% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WK($3.96B) has a higher market cap than FRSH($3.11B). WK has higher P/E ratio than FRSH: WK (86.62) vs FRSH (18.94). FRSH YTD gains are higher at: -2.612 vs. WK (-15.641). WK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 75.5M vs. FRSH (66.7M). WK has more cash in the bank: 815M vs. FRSH (664M). FRSH has less debt than WK: FRSH (34.6M) vs WK (793M). WK has higher revenues than FRSH: WK (966M) vs FRSH (904M).
FRSHWKFRSH / WK
Capitalization3.11B3.96B79%
EBITDA66.7M75.5M88%
Gain YTD-2.612-15.64117%
P/E Ratio18.9486.6222%
Revenue904M966M94%
Total Cash664M815M81%
Total Debt34.6M793M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRSH vs WK: Fundamental Ratings
FRSH
WK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6783
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
47100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRSH's Valuation (58) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WK (99) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than WK’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as WK (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's SMR Rating (47) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WK (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than WK’s over the last 12 months.

WK's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (41) in the Restaurants industry. This means that WK’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for WK (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew significantly faster than WK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSHWK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
FRSH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCIG9.27N/A
N/A
Polen Capital International Growth ETF
FEBM31.60-0.01
-0.03%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Feb
RAA30.45-0.04
-0.15%
SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF
JMTG49.57-0.09
-0.18%
JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
POWA87.85-1.02
-1.15%
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF

WK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WK has been closely correlated with WDAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WK jumps, then WDAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WK
1D Price
Change %
WK100%
-1.29%
WDAY - WK
68%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
PCOR - WK
68%
Closely correlated
-3.65%
FRSH - WK
66%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
QTWO - WK
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
CRM - WK
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
More