MFG
Price
$11.03
Change
+$0.14 (+1.29%)
Updated
Oct 5 closing price
Capitalization
135.25B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WF
Price
$75.68
Change
+$0.47 (+0.62%)
Updated
Oct 5 closing price
Capitalization
19.77B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFG vs WF

MFG vs WF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFG vs. WF commentary
Oct 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a Buy and WF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFG vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
MFG
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7088
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3225
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WF's Valuation (22) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFG (85). This means that WF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFG’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (7). This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (1). This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WF (40). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (32). This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2026
Stock price -- (MFG: $11.03 vs. WF: $75.68)
Brand notoriety: MFG and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFG: 83% vs. WF: 79%
Market capitalization -- MFG: $135.25B vs. WF: $19.77B
MFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $135.25B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $19.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while WF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the long-term than MFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than WF.

Price Growth

MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.18% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.

WF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DRK2.690.05
+1.89%
Darkhorse Technologies Inc
WDS21.77-0.02
-0.09%
Woodside Energy Group Limited
HDSN5.22-0.02
-0.29%
Hudson Technologies
CAC56.98-0.21
-0.37%
Camden National Corp
ATAT32.13-0.13
-0.40%
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been loosely correlated with LYG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then LYG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
+1.29%
LYG - MFG
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
DB - MFG
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NWG - MFG
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
KB - MFG
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
WF - MFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
More

WF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WF
1D Price
Change %
WF100%
+0.62%
SHG - WF
82%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
KB - WF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
DB - WF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LYG - WF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
BCH - WF
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
More