28 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFAR vs KIM
DFAR vs KIM Comparison
Open Charts DFAR vs KIM
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF
Price$23.67
Change+$0.03 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
Kimco Realty
Price$21.57
Change+$0.13 (+0.61%)
Volume$863
Capitalization13.22B
DFAR vs KIM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFAR vs. KIM commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFAR is a StrongBuy and KIM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KIM: Fundamental Ratings
KIM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DFAR | KIM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 29 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DFAR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAR has been closely correlated with PLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAR jumps, then PLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAR | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| PLD - DFAR | 85% Closely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| ARE - DFAR | 84% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| FRT - DFAR | 83% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| KIM - DFAR | 83% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| STAG - DFAR | 83% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
More | ||||
KIM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIM has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KIM jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y