DIN
Price
$36.00
Change
+$0.29 (+0.81%)
Updated
Jul 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
456.54M
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRSH
Price
$10.83
Change
+$0.47 (+4.54%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.99B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIN vs FRSH

DIN vs FRSH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. FRSH commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and FRSH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (DIN: $35.99 vs. FRSH: $10.83)
Brand notoriety: DIN and FRSH are both not notable
DIN represents the Restaurants, while FRSH is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 62% vs. FRSH: 57%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $456.54M vs. FRSH: $2.99B
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $456.54M. FRSH’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $193.69B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.51B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRSH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the long-term than FRSH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRSH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the short-term than DIN.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.95% price change this week, while FRSH (@Packaged Software) price change was +6.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.68%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-2.13% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

@Packaged Software (-2.53% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRSH($2.99B) has a higher market cap than DIN($457M). DIN has higher P/E ratio than FRSH: DIN (31.30) vs FRSH (17.63). DIN YTD gains are higher at: 13.374 vs. FRSH (-11.592). DIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 149M vs. FRSH (42.9M). FRSH has less debt than DIN: FRSH (38.8M) vs DIN (1.62B). DIN (890M) and FRSH (871M) have equivalent revenues.
DINFRSHDIN / FRSH
Capitalization457M2.99B15%
EBITDA149M42.9M347%
Gain YTD13.374-11.592-115%
P/E Ratio31.3017.63178%
Revenue890M871M102%
Total CashN/A779M-
Total Debt1.62B38.8M4,168%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs FRSH: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
FRSH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10091
SMR RATING
1..100
10051
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
320
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (15) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRSH (60). This means that DIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (100). This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's SMR Rating (51) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FRSH (48). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FRSH (20). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINFRSH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRSH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PWRD115.18N/A
N/A
TCW Transform Systems ETF
PJP117.60-0.95
-0.80%
Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF
TRND36.52-0.32
-0.88%
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
DIVI42.49-0.40
-0.93%
Franklin Intl Core Div Tlt Idx ETF
TEMT22.37-2.02
-8.30%
Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF

DIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIN has been loosely correlated with BJRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIN jumps, then BJRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIN
1D Price
Change %
DIN100%
+0.78%
BJRI - DIN
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
FRSH - DIN
53%
Loosely correlated
+4.54%
CBRL - DIN
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.83%
CAKE - DIN
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
BLMN - DIN
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
More