DIN
Price
$30.39
Change
+$0.29 (+0.96%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
67 days until earnings call
YUM
Price
$132.34
Change
+$1.98 (+1.52%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
46 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DIN vs YUM

Header iconDIN vs YUM Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs YUMBanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$30.39
Change+$0.29 (+0.96%)
Volume$890.34K
CapitalizationN/A
Yum! Brands
Price$132.34
Change+$1.98 (+1.52%)
Volume$24.02K
CapitalizationN/A
DIN vs YUM Comparison Chart
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. YUM commentary
Dec 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and YUM is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 21, 2024
Stock price -- (DIN: $30.39 vs. YUM: $132.36)
Brand notoriety: DIN: Not notable vs. YUM: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 172% vs. YUM: 180%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $463.34M vs. YUM: $36.94B
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $463.34M. YUM’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $36.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $209.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYUM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YUM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, YUM is a better buy in the long-term than DIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • YUM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YUM is a better buy in the short-term than DIN.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.79% price change this week, while YUM (@Restaurants) price change was -3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

YUM is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-2.31% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUM($36.9B) has a higher market cap than DIN($463M). YUM has higher P/E ratio than DIN: YUM (24.74) vs DIN (5.06). YUM YTD gains are higher at: 3.317 vs. DIN (-35.111). YUM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.5B vs. DIN (219M). DIN has less debt than YUM: DIN (1.59B) vs YUM (11.2B). YUM has higher revenues than DIN: YUM (7.22B) vs DIN (814M).
DINYUMDIN / YUM
Capitalization463M36.9B1%
EBITDA219M2.5B9%
Gain YTD-35.1113.317-1,059%
P/E Ratio5.0624.7420%
Revenue814M7.22B11%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.59B11.2B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs YUM: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
YUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6579
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
10010
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6254
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9355
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (6) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (31). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that YUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DIN (100). This means that YUM’s stock grew significantly faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (62). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DIN (93). This means that YUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than DIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINYUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UA7.780.22
+2.91%
Under Armour
NXGL4.730.11
+2.38%
NexGel
TMCI6.950.05
+0.72%
Treace Medical Concepts
QSI1.29N/A
+0.39%
Quantum-Si
SHG33.840.11
+0.33%
Shinhan Financial Group Co Ltd

YUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUM has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUM jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUM
1D Price
Change %
YUM100%
+1.53%
FRSH - YUM
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
MCD - YUM
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
QSR - YUM
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
YUMC - YUM
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
SBUX - YUM
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
More