It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DMRC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DMRC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
DMRC (@Packaged Software) experienced а -16.56% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.38%.
DMRC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
ZM is expected to report earnings on Aug 24, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| DMRC | ZM | DMRC / ZM | |
| Capitalization | 214M | 25.3B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -19.56M | 1.32B | -1% |
| Gain YTD | 45.122 | 1.275 | 3,540% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 12.72 | - |
| Revenue | 32.1M | 4.93B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 9.96M | 7.72B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 5M | 60.2M | 8% |
DMRC | ZM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZM's Valuation (84) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as DMRC (95) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to DMRC’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as DMRC (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to DMRC’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's SMR Rating (43) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DMRC (99) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew somewhat faster than DMRC’s over the last 12 months.
DMRC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZM (57) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that DMRC’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as DMRC (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to DMRC’s over the last 12 months.
| DMRC | ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 60% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MEMFX | 45.87 | -0.19 | -0.41% |
| MFS Emerging Markets Equity R2 | |||
| FSCEX | 19.43 | -0.15 | -0.77% |
| Fidelity Advisor Small Cap C | |||
| FMFAX | 102.35 | -1.32 | -1.27% |
| Fidelity Advisor Materials A | |||
| HSEIX | 14.11 | -0.25 | -1.74% |
| Hartford Small Cap Value I | |||
| MEQFX | 18.88 | -0.35 | -1.82% |
| AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select I | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMRC has been loosely correlated with AI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMRC jumps, then AI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMRC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMRC | 100% | -9.25% | ||
| AI - DMRC | 52% Loosely correlated | -5.86% | ||
| FLYW - DMRC | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.77% | ||
| SPT - DMRC | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.69% | ||
| ZM - DMRC | 41% Loosely correlated | -5.08% | ||
| PSFE - DMRC | 40% Loosely correlated | -5.29% | ||
More | ||||