ED
Price
$108.15
Change
+$0.37 (+0.34%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
39.86B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PNW
Price
$100.77
Change
+$0.37 (+0.37%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:23 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.17B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ED vs PNW

ED vs PNW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Pinnacle West Capital (PNW) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both ED and PNW are regulated utilities offering defensive characteristics with low betas relative to the broader market.
  • ED trades at a forward dividend yield of approximately 3.23% with an upcoming quarterly earnings release on August 6, 2026.
  • PNW has delivered stronger year-to-date returns near 16% amid customer growth and favorable weather impacts in its Arizona service territory.
  • Recent market activity shows modest pullbacks for both stocks over the past month, with PNW experiencing a slightly larger decline.
  • Upcoming second-quarter earnings reports for both companies in early August 2026 represent near-term catalysts that could influence relative performance.
  • Sector exposure remains similar, though geographic and regulatory differences create distinct risk and growth profiles.

Introduction

Consolidated Edison (ED) and Pinnacle West Capital (PNW) represent two established electric utility holding companies operating in distinct U.S. regions. This comparison examines their business models, recent stock behavior, and relative positioning amid current market conditions. Institutional investors, income-focused portfolios, and traders seeking defensive exposure within the utilities sector may find the analysis relevant for evaluating stability, dividend consistency, and near-term momentum differences between the two names.

ED Overview and Recent Performance

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) provides electric, gas, and steam services primarily in New York City and surrounding areas. The company maintains a low-beta profile of 0.26, reflecting its regulated utility operations and defensive qualities. In recent market activity, shares have traded near $108.85 with modest declines over the past month. Key developments include the declaration of a quarterly dividend of $0.8875 per share and preparations for second-quarter 2026 earnings scheduled for August 6. First-quarter results showed solid adjusted earnings per share, supporting expectations for full-year adjusted EPS in the $6.00 to $6.20 range. Sentiment has remained steady around earnings visibility and dividend reliability, though broader market rotation has contributed to limited price pressure in recent weeks.

PNW Overview and Recent Performance

Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (PNW) serves as the holding company for Arizona Public Service, delivering electricity across Arizona. The stock carries a beta of 0.43 and has shown resilience with year-to-date gains approaching 16%. Recent performance includes a pullback of roughly 5% over the past month amid general sector softness. First-quarter 2026 results benefited from higher customer usage driven by warmer weather and customer growth, producing earnings per share of $0.27 that exceeded estimates. The company plans to release second-quarter results on August 4, 2026. Market sentiment has been supported by operational momentum and earnings outperformance, tempered by typical seasonal and interest-rate sensitivities affecting utilities in recent weeks.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing artificial intelligence trading bots from a much larger pool of hundreds available across the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics, yet only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions earn placement in the trending section. Available statistics often highlight ranges such as win rates above 60% for top selections, average trade durations from intraday to multi-week, and profit factors exceeding 1.5 in favorable setups. The page provides transparent details on each bot’s historical results, drawdowns, and ticker focus to help users evaluate fit. All the AI trading bots have different trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and sets of tickers they trade. Review the curated options on the Trending AI Robots page for additional insights.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both companies operate regulated utility models with predictable cash flows, yet geographic differences create trade-offs: ED benefits from dense urban demand in the Northeast while PNW gains from population growth and climate-driven usage in the Southwest. Recent momentum favors PNW on a year-to-date basis, though both names have experienced comparable modest retracements in recent market activity. Risk factors include regulatory proceedings and interest-rate sensitivity for each, with ED offering a slightly lower beta for greater stability. Market sentiment reflects defensive appeal for both, tempered by upcoming earnings that could highlight any divergence in operational trends or guidance. Sector exposure remains concentrated in utilities, limiting diversification benefits within the pair.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings visibility, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to PNW due to stronger year-to-date performance and recent earnings beats supported by regional demand drivers. ED remains competitive for its lower volatility and reliable dividend profile. Outcomes will depend on second-quarter results and broader market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ED vs. PNW commentary
Aug 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ED is a Hold and PNW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2026
Stock price -- (ED: $107.78 vs. PNW: $100.40)
Brand notoriety: ED and PNW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ED: 86% vs. PNW: 67%
Market capitalization -- ED: $39.86B vs. PNW: $12.17B
ED [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $39.86B. PNW’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $12.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $178.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $30.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ED’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePNW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ED’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PNW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ED is a better buy in the long-term than PNW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ED’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ED’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PNW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PNW is a better buy in the short-term than ED.

Price Growth

ED (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while PNW (@Electric Utilities) price change was -1.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

ED is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

PNW is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.16% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ED($39.9B) has a higher market cap than PNW($12.2B). PNW has higher P/E ratio than ED: PNW (19.27) vs ED (17.73). PNW YTD gains are higher at: 16.364 vs. ED (10.286). ED has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.35B vs. PNW (2.2B). PNW has less debt than ED: PNW (15.1B) vs ED (27.2B). ED has higher revenues than PNW: ED (17.2B) vs PNW (5.46B).
EDPNWED / PNW
Capitalization39.9B12.2B327%
EBITDA6.35B2.2B288%
Gain YTD10.28616.36463%
P/E Ratio17.7319.2792%
Revenue17.2B5.46B315%
Total Cash147MN/A-
Total Debt27.2B15.1B180%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ED vs PNW: Fundamental Ratings
ED
PNW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
709
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1927
SMR RATING
1..100
7674
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5856
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5748
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ED's Valuation (32) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNW (67). This means that ED’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNW’s over the last 12 months.

ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as PNW (27). This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to PNW’s over the last 12 months.

PNW's SMR Rating (74) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (76). This means that PNW’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

PNW's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (58). This means that PNW’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

PNW's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (57). This means that PNW’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDPNW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PNW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CJMB2.190.27
+14.06%
Callan JMB Inc
SMPL10.940.08
+0.74%
Simply Good Foods Company (The)
OMSE4.28-0.07
-1.61%
OMS Energy Technologies Inc.
EWTX43.56-0.75
-1.69%
Edgewise Therapeutics
FERG245.18-6.33
-2.52%
Ferguson Enterprises Inc.

ED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ED
1D Price
Change %
ED100%
+0.26%
DUK - ED
83%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
WEC - ED
78%
Closely correlated
+2.28%
CMS - ED
77%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
AEE - ED
76%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
PNW - ED
75%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
More

PNW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNW has been closely correlated with LNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNW jumps, then LNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNW
1D Price
Change %
PNW100%
+0.36%
LNT - PNW
83%
Closely correlated
+2.42%
DUK - PNW
81%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
EVRG - PNW
80%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
OGE - PNW
79%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
AEE - PNW
79%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
More