ED
Price
$105.36
Change
-$1.77 (-1.65%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
38.83B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PNW
Price
$98.40
Change
-$1.37 (-1.37%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
11.92B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ED vs PNW

Header iconED vs PNW Comparison
Open Charts ED vs PNWBanner chart's image
ED vs PNW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Pinnacle West (PNW) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • PNW has delivered stronger year-to-date (YTD, performance from the start of the calendar year) returns of approximately 15.5% compared to ED's 11.3%.
  • Both stocks offer compelling dividend yields around 3.2-3.5%, appealing to income-focused investors in a volatile market.
  • PNW recently surpassed Q1 earnings expectations with $0.27 per share versus a forecasted loss, boosting near-term sentiment.
  • ED maintains stability ahead of its upcoming Q1 earnings on May 7, with projected EPS growth of 3.1% year-over-year.
  • Low betas (0.29 for ED, 0.46 for PNW; beta measures volatility relative to the broader market) position both as defensive utility plays.
  • PNW trades near its 52-week high, reflecting positive momentum, while ED shows resilience amid recent market fluctuations.

Introduction

ED and PNW, both prominent regulated utility companies, provide essential electricity and related services in key U.S. regions. Investors seeking defensive positions with reliable dividends and low volatility often compare such stocks, especially during periods of economic uncertainty or interest rate shifts. This analysis examines their recent market positioning, performance trends, and comparative strengths to aid traders evaluating relative value in the utilities sector, where stability meets modest growth potential from infrastructure demands.

ED Overview and Recent Performance

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) is a leading utility holding company primarily serving the New York City metropolitan area with electricity, natural gas, and steam distribution. In recent market activity, its stock has traded around the $110 level, within a 52-week range of $94.96 to $116.23, reflecting a market capitalization of about $40.4 billion. Sentiment remains supported by its forward dividend yield of 3.15% and low beta of 0.29, underscoring its defensive appeal. Recent weeks have seen modest pressure from broader sector rotations, but anticipation for Q1 earnings on May 7—forecasting EPS of $2.32 and revenue growth—has sustained interest among conservative investors. Key influences include steady regulatory approvals and infrastructure investments, bolstering long-term reliability over short-term volatility.

PNW Overview and Recent Performance

Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (PNW) operates through its subsidiary Arizona Public Service, delivering electricity to customers across Arizona. The stock has hovered near $101-$104 recently, close to its 52-week high of $104.92 from a low of $85.32, with a market cap of roughly $12.3 billion. Its forward dividend yield stands at 3.52%, complemented by a beta of 0.46. Recent performance benefited from a strong Q1 earnings report on May 4, where EPS of $0.27 significantly beat expectations of a loss, driving positive momentum. Arizona's population growth and data center expansions have supported sentiment, though shares experienced minor pullbacks amid rising interest rate concerns in recent weeks.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of top-performing AI trading bots from its library of over 350 agents that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for current market conditions earn a spot in this dynamic section, featuring 25 bots with diverse strategies like short-term trend following, volatility plays, and fundamental analysis. Performance highlights include annualized returns ranging from +23% to +162%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and varying timeframes from 5 minutes to daily. These bots adapt to sectors like semiconductors, industrials, and utilities, offering real-time signals with risk controls such as take-profit/stop-loss corridors. Traders can explore these high-potential options to enhance their strategies in today's environment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both ED and PNW operate in the regulated utilities sector, benefiting from stable cash flows but facing rate base growth constraints. ED's larger scale in the dense New York market provides broader diversification across electric, gas, and steam, contrasting PNW's focus on Arizona's electric services amid regional economic expansion. Recent momentum favors PNW with superior YTD gains and an earnings beat, while ED offers greater stability via lower beta and higher market cap. Risk factors are similar—interest rate sensitivity and regulatory hurdles—but PNW exposes investors to faster growth from data centers versus ED's mature urban base. Market sentiment tilts toward PNW post-earnings, though both P/E ratios (around 19-20) suggest fair valuations.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward PNW based on stronger trend consistency, recent earnings catalysts, and relative outperformance in recent months. While ED excels in stability, PNW's positioning amid Arizona's growth drivers offers higher probability of near-term upside, though utilities remain sensitive to macroeconomic shifts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ED vs. PNW commentary
May 17, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ED is a Hold and PNW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 17, 2026
Stock price -- (ED: $105.36 vs. PNW: $98.40)
Brand notoriety: ED and PNW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ED: 118% vs. PNW: 125%
Market capitalization -- ED: $38.83B vs. PNW: $11.92B
ED [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $38.83B. PNW’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $11.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $194.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $24.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ED’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNW is a better buy in the long-term than ED.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ED’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ED’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PNW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ED is a better buy in the short-term than PNW.

Price Growth

ED (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -0.06% price change this week, while PNW (@Electric Utilities) price change was -0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

ED is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

PNW is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-0.83% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ED($38.8B) has a higher market cap than PNW($11.9B). PNW (18.36) and ED (17.77) have similar P/E ratio . PNW YTD gains are higher at: 13.019 vs. ED (7.809). ED has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.35B vs. PNW (2.2B). PNW has less debt than ED: PNW (15.1B) vs ED (28.4B). ED has higher revenues than PNW: ED (17.2B) vs PNW (5.46B).
EDPNWED / PNW
Capitalization38.8B11.9B326%
EBITDA6.35B2.2B288%
Gain YTD7.80913.01960%
P/E Ratio17.7718.3697%
Revenue17.2B5.46B315%
Total CashN/A6.41M-
Total Debt28.4B15.1B188%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ED vs PNW: Fundamental Ratings
ED
PNW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5558
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2434
SMR RATING
1..100
7572
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5544
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNW's Valuation (53) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (57). This means that PNW’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as PNW (34). This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to PNW’s over the last 12 months.

PNW's SMR Rating (72) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (75). This means that PNW’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

PNW's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (57). This means that PNW’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

PNW's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (55). This means that PNW’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDPNW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PNW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHPU9.050.48
+5.60%
Direxion Daily SHOP Bull 2X ETF
LOTI25.64-0.16
-0.63%
Liberty One Tactical Income ETF
VTHR324.52-4.16
-1.27%
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
GLIN44.54-0.76
-1.67%
VanEck India Growth Ldrs ETF
EFAX52.35-0.90
-1.70%
State Street®SPDR®MSCIEAFEFsslFlRsvFrETF

ED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ED
1D Price
Change %
ED100%
-1.65%
DUK - ED
82%
Closely correlated
-1.86%
WEC - ED
78%
Closely correlated
-2.22%
CMS - ED
76%
Closely correlated
-2.21%
PNW - ED
76%
Closely correlated
-1.37%
FTS - ED
73%
Closely correlated
-3.07%
More

PNW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNW has been closely correlated with OGE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNW jumps, then OGE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNW
1D Price
Change %
PNW100%
-1.37%
OGE - PNW
81%
Closely correlated
-2.61%
DUK - PNW
80%
Closely correlated
-1.86%
CMS - PNW
79%
Closely correlated
-2.21%
LNT - PNW
79%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
AEE - PNW
79%
Closely correlated
-2.96%
More