EFSC
Price
$61.03
Change
+$0.34 (+0.56%)
Updated
Sep 25, 11:59 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.2B
31 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MCB
Price
$89.33
Change
+$0.71 (+0.80%)
Updated
Sep 25, 11:54 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.09B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EFSC vs MCB

EFSC vs MCB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EFSC vs. MCB commentary
Sep 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EFSC is a StrongBuy and MCB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EFSC vs MCB: Fundamental Ratings
EFSC
MCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6191
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4489
SMR RATING
1..100
1520
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5654
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3352
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFSC's Valuation (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCB (57) in the Major Banks industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MCB’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCB (89) in the Major Banks industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCB’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCB (20) in the Major Banks industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MCB’s over the last 12 months.

MCB's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCB (52) in the Major Banks industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to MCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EFSCMCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2026
Stock price -- (EFSC: $60.69 vs. MCB: $88.62)
Brand notoriety: EFSC and MCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EFSC: 125% vs. MCB: 76%
Market capitalization -- EFSC: $2.2B vs. MCB: $1.1B
EFSC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.2B. MCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $172.4B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EFSC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the long-term than MCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EFSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EFSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MCB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCB is a better buy in the short-term than EFSC.

Price Growth

EFSC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.33% price change this week, while MCB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

MCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.10% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
EFSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YELP18.370.64
+3.61%
YELP
FIX1643.3917.49
+1.08%
Comfort Systems USA
GDEV10.90N/A
N/A
GDEV Inc
HASI36.16-0.05
-0.14%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital Inc.
AUST1.09-0.03
-2.68%
Austin Gold Corp

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with BUSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then BUSE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
+1.41%
BUSE - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
FRME - EFSC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
BY - EFSC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
THFF - EFSC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
UVSP - EFSC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
More

MCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCB has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCB jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCB
1D Price
Change %
MCB100%
+1.01%
FFBC - MCB
73%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
HOPE - MCB
73%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
EFSC - MCB
72%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
HFWA - MCB
72%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
MBWM - MCB
72%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
More