HFWA
Price
$28.73
Change
+$0.65 (+2.31%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.16B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MCB
Price
$96.98
Change
+$2.46 (+2.60%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.17B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HFWA vs MCB

HFWA vs MCB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HFWA vs. MCB commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFWA is a Hold and MCB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (HFWA: $28.08 vs. MCB: $94.52)
Brand notoriety: HFWA and MCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HFWA: 100% vs. MCB: 95%
Market capitalization -- HFWA: $1.16B vs. MCB: $1.17B
HFWA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.16B. MCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HFWA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HFWA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCB is a better buy in the long-term than HFWA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HFWA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HFWA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MCB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCB is a better buy in the short-term than HFWA.

Price Growth

HFWA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.27% price change this week, while MCB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

HFWA is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.

MCB is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCB($1.17B) and HFWA($1.16B) have the same market capitalization . HFWA has higher P/E ratio than MCB: HFWA (13.76) vs MCB (11.68). MCB YTD gains are higher at: 24.414 vs. HFWA (20.892). HFWA has more cash in the bank: 52.6M vs. MCB (12.1M). MCB has less debt than HFWA: MCB (16M) vs HFWA (42.4M). MCB has higher revenues than HFWA: MCB (306M) vs HFWA (266M).
HFWAMCBHFWA / MCB
Capitalization1.16B1.17B99%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.89224.41486%
P/E Ratio13.7611.68118%
Revenue266M306M87%
Total Cash52.6M12.1M435%
Total Debt42.4M16M265%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HFWA vs MCB: Fundamental Ratings
HFWA
MCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2318
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8177
SMR RATING
1..100
6147
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6448
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HFWA's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCB (71) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HFWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCB’s over the last 12 months.

MCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (81) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

MCB's SMR Rating (47) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

MCB's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

MCB's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (64) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HFWAMCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HFWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCHSX33.70N/A
N/A
Putnam Global Health Care C
PNEAX11.77N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Dividend Value A
SOAEX12.36N/A
N/A
Spirit of America Energy A
SWLGX18.32N/A
N/A
Schwab ® US Large-Cap Growth Idx
AFIFX103.03-0.57
-0.55%
American Funds Fundamental Invs F1