ELV
Price
$412.92
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
70 days until earnings call
UNH
Price
$614.67
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
63 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ELV vs UNH

Header iconELV vs UNH Comparison
Open Charts ELV vs UNHBanner chart's image
Elevance Health
Price$412.92
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.03M
CapitalizationN/A
Unitedhealth Group
Price$614.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.81M
CapitalizationN/A
ELV vs UNH Comparison Chart
Loading...
ELV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELV vs. UNH commentary
Nov 14, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELV is a Buy and UNH is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2024
Stock price -- (ELV: $412.92 vs. UNH: $614.67)
Brand notoriety: ELV and UNH are both notable
Both companies represent the Managed Health Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELV: 123% vs. UNH: 85%
Market capitalization -- ELV: $120.06B vs. UNH: $451.47B
ELV [@Managed Health Care] is valued at $120.06B. UNH’s [@Managed Health Care] market capitalization is $451.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $451.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $68.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUNH’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • ELV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UNH’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNH is a better buy in the long-term than ELV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ELV and UNH are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ELV (@Managed Health Care) experienced а -1.16% price change this week, while UNH (@Managed Health Care) price change was +8.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -5.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

ELV is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

UNH is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Managed Health Care (-5.55% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNH($451B) has a higher market cap than ELV($120B). UNH (20.52) and ELV (20.46) have similar P/E ratio . UNH YTD gains are higher at: 18.128 vs. ELV (-11.620). ELV has more cash in the bank: 36.1B vs. UNH (29.6B). ELV has less debt than UNH: ELV (25.1B) vs UNH (62.5B). UNH has higher revenues than ELV: UNH (372B) vs ELV (171B).
ELVUNHELV / UNH
Capitalization120B451B27%
EBITDAN/A36.3B-
Gain YTD-11.62018.128-64%
P/E Ratio20.4620.52100%
Revenue171B372B46%
Total Cash36.1B29.6B122%
Total Debt25.1B62.5B40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELV vs UNH: Fundamental Ratings
ELV
UNH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
515
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
295
SMR RATING
1..100
9954
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6431
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8319
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELV's Valuation (25) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as UNH (32). This means that ELV’s stock grew similarly to UNH’s over the last 12 months.

UNH's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as ELV (29). This means that UNH’s stock grew similarly to ELV’s over the last 12 months.

UNH's SMR Rating (54) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELV (99). This means that UNH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELV’s over the last 12 months.

UNH's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELV (64). This means that UNH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELV’s over the last 12 months.

UNH's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELV (83). This means that UNH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELVUNH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ELV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LWAY24.16-0.02
-0.08%
Lifeway Foods
MSGS225.11-0.93
-0.41%
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp
EFX267.77-3.23
-1.19%
Equifax
MRM2.64-0.07
-2.65%
MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies
ASTL11.17-0.53
-4.53%
Algoma Steel Group

ELV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELV has been closely correlated with UNH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ELV jumps, then UNH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELV
1D Price
Change %
ELV100%
-2.93%
UNH - ELV
79%
Closely correlated
-1.69%
MOH - ELV
73%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
CNC - ELV
70%
Closely correlated
-3.54%
HUM - ELV
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
CVS - ELV
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.19%
More