Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) are leading master limited partnerships (MLPs) in the midstream energy sector, focusing on pipelines, storage, and logistics for natural gas liquids, crude oil, and related products. This stock comparison evaluates their business models, recent performance, and market positioning amid stable energy demand and infrastructure growth. Traders seeking high-yield income with low volatility, or investors eyeing relative performance in oils-energy, will find insights into contrasts like diversification versus crude specialization, dividend appeal, and momentum in the current environment.
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) is a major provider of midstream energy services, operating pipelines and facilities for natural gas liquids (NGLs), crude oil, natural gas, petrochemicals, and refined products across key U.S. basins. With a market cap of $83.6 billion, it maintains a resilient, fee-based model insulated from direct commodity swings.
In recent market activity, EPD shares traded around $38.67, reflecting year-to-date gains of 24.36% and one-year returns of 35.54%, outperforming the S&P 500. Recent weeks showed modest 0.68% monthly advances amid broader energy rotation, supported by Q1 2026 results with $2.7 billion EBITDA (up 10% year-over-year) despite adjusted earnings per unit missing estimates at 68 cents. Sentiment benefits from 27 consecutive years of distribution growth ($0.55 quarterly, 5.66% yield), a $4.8-$5.1 billion project backlog, and Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), driven by inflation-linked fees and capital returns.
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) specializes in crude oil and NGL transportation, terminalling, storage, and marketing via extensive U.S. and Canadian networks, emphasizing Permian Basin volumes. Its $16 billion market cap reflects a focused crude-heavy strategy transitioning to a pure-play via NGL divestiture and Cactus III acquisition.
Shares recently hovered near $22.65, with superior year-to-date performance of 31.23% and one-year gains around 48%, fueled by momentum in crude logistics. In recent weeks, 2.38% monthly upticks aligned with sector strength, bolstered by Q4 2025 adjusted EBITDA of $738 million and full-year $2.83 billion, alongside a 10% quarterly distribution hike to $0.4175 (7.04% yield). Positive analyst initiations (e.g., Truist Buy) and regulatory progress on asset sales have lifted sentiment, with expectations for 2026 EBITDA midpoint of $2.75 billion and synergies enhancing free cash flow.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers selected from 351 total AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These curated bots excel in current market conditions, delivering annualized returns ranging from 23% to 162%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Strategies vary by timeframe (e.g., 15-minute to 60-minute), style (technical, fundamental, multi-agent), and focus—spanning semiconductors, industrials, energy sectors, small-caps, and leveraged ETFs—with average trade durations of 1 to 49 days and profit-to-drawdown ratios up to 17. Users can copy trade via virtual, signal, or brokerage agents for real-time signals and risk management. Explore these high performers to enhance your portfolio across diverse conditions.
Both EPD and PAA leverage fee-based midstream models for stability, but EPD’s broader diversification (NGLs, gas, petrochemicals) contrasts PAA’s crude oil emphasis and Permian growth via acquisitions like Cactus III. Recent momentum favors PAA on YTD returns (31% vs. 24%) and higher yield (7% vs. 5.7%), yet EPD leads in scale ($83B vs. $16B cap), ROE, margins, and 27-year distribution streak. Risks include regulatory hurdles for PAA’s NGL sale and throughput variability for both, with similar low betas signaling resilience. Sector exposure tilts EPD toward multi-product demand, while PAA bets on crude volumes; sentiment leans positive for both amid infrastructure tailwinds.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors EPD for its superior trend consistency, diversified catalysts like project backlogs and EBITDA growth, and relative stability in recent volatility. While PAA shows stronger short-term momentum and yield, EPD’s scale, lower PE (14x vs. 20x), and proven capital returns position it probabilistically better for sustained outperformance in the midstream landscape.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePAA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
EPD (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -0.88% price change this week, while PAA (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -2.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.15%.
EPD is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
PAA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| EPD | PAA | EPD / PAA | |
| Capitalization | 82.6B | 15.5B | 533% |
| EBITDA | 9.81B | 2.91B | 337% |
| Gain YTD | 22.717 | 27.170 | 84% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.13 | 19.77 | 71% |
| Revenue | 51.6B | 44.3B | 116% |
| Total Cash | 191M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 33.9B | 11.5B | 295% |
EPD | PAA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAA's Valuation (6) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (14). This means that PAA’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAA (7). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to PAA’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's SMR Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAA (64). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to PAA’s over the last 12 months.
PAA's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (45). This means that PAA’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
EPD's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAA (45). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to PAA’s over the last 12 months.
| EPD | PAA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 33% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 24% | 1 day ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 33% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 14 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 34% | 6 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 19% | 1 day ago 47% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TPLS | 25.09 | -0.07 | -0.30% |
| Thornburg Core Plus Bond ETF | |||
| TAGG | 42.44 | -0.14 | -0.33% |
| T. Rowe Price QM US Bond ETF | |||
| BAMA | 36.16 | -0.22 | -0.59% |
| Brookstone Active ETF | |||
| NCA | 9.66 | -0.06 | -0.62% |
| Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund | |||
| EMCS | 43.73 | -1.65 | -3.64% |
| Xtrackers MSCI EMs Climate Selection ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPD has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPD jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAA has been closely correlated with PAGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAA jumps, then PAGP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAA | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| PAGP - PAA | 96% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| AM - PAA | 77% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| OKE - PAA | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| EPD - PAA | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| TRGP - PAA | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
More | ||||