This stock comparison pits AM, a regional midstream operator tied to the Appalachian Basin, against EPD, a diversified national midstream giant. Both companies transport and process natural gas, NGLs (natural gas liquids), and related products, benefiting from steady fee-based revenues in the energy sector. Investors seeking high-yield dividend plays amid fluctuating commodity prices or traders eyeing relative performance in oil and gas midstream will find value here. Recent market activity has underscored their resilience, with YTD gains reflecting demand for infrastructure amid energy transitions. This analysis highlights key metrics, recent developments, and contrasts to inform balanced decision-making.
Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) owns and operates midstream energy assets primarily in the Appalachian Basin, serving its parent Antero Resources through gathering pipelines, compressor stations, processing plants, and water handling services. This focus generates stable, fee-based cash flows from natural gas and NGL transport.
In recent market activity, AM shares have traded around $21.37, up 21.58% YTD but down about 8% over the prior month amid broader energy volatility. The company announced a Q1 2026 dividend of $0.225 per share (ex-date April 29), maintaining its annualized payout at $0.90 and a 4.21% yield. Q1 earnings and conference call are scheduled soon, following Q4 2025 results that missed EPS estimates. Sentiment reflects natural gas price pressures but supports long-term basin growth, with a trailing P/E of 24.85 and forward P/E of 15.24 signaling growth potential.
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) is a leading midstream provider with extensive pipelines for NGLs, crude oil, natural gas, and petrochemicals across the U.S., operating in four segments for diversified fee-based revenues.
Shares recently closed near $38.00, delivering 20.47% YTD gains amid steady performance in recent weeks. EPD declared a Q1 2026 distribution of $0.55 per unit (ex-date April 30), supporting a 5.76% yield and 27 consecutive years of increases. Q1 earnings are due April 28, with analysts eyeing EPS of $0.71. Trading at a trailing P/E of 14.29, the stock benefits from project backlogs and resilient demand, though recent price appreciation has narrowed some valuation gaps.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's 351 AI Trading Bots, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—from short-term 5-minute scalps to longer-term swings—using technical or fundamental analysis, with varying win rates, average returns, profit factors, trade counts, and drawdowns tailored to low, medium, or high volatility. AI curates the top 25 trending bots best suited to current market conditions, prioritizing those demonstrating strong recent performance and adaptability. This selection helps users identify high-potential options for copy trading via paper, signal, virtual, or brokerage agents. Explore the page to match bots to your risk tolerance and timeframe.
Business models differ in scale: AM relies heavily on Antero Resources in one basin, risking concentration, while EPD spans multiple commodities and regions for broader exposure. Growth drivers include EPD's $4.8 billion project backlog versus AM's regional expansion.
Recent momentum favors AM over 12 months (36% vs. 27%), but EPD shows steadier recent gains. Risk factors highlight AM's higher beta (0.72) and debt/equity (163%) versus EPD's 0.53 beta and 114% leverage; both boast strong ROE (return on equity) around 20%. Market sentiment leans positive for both amid dividend reliability, though EPD's lower P/E offers value trade-offs against AM's growth tilt.
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward EPD with moderate confidence, citing its superior scale, lower valuation (trailing P/E 14.29), higher yield, and trend stability amid energy demand. AM offers momentum appeal but faces higher relative risks. Observable factors like consistent distributions and diversification position EPD favorably in the near term, though shifting nat gas dynamics could elevate AM.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEPD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AM (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.70% price change this week, while EPD (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -1.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.32%.
AM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
EPD is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| AM | EPD | AM / EPD | |
| Capitalization | 10.3B | 80.6B | 13% |
| EBITDA | 970M | 9.81B | 10% |
| Gain YTD | 24.571 | 19.791 | 124% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.20 | 13.80 | 183% |
| Revenue | 1.29B | 51.6B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 0 | 191M | - |
| Total Debt | 3.71B | 33.9B | 11% |
AM | EPD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EPD's Valuation (11) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as AM (18). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to AM’s over the last 12 months.
AM's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (5). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
AM's SMR Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (46). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
AM's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (50). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
AM's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (37). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.
| AM | EPD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 40% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 33% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 32% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 25% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 68% | 10 days ago 44% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 34% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 43% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AM has been loosely correlated with DTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AM jumps, then DTM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPD has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPD jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.