Investors seeking exposure to the regulated electric utility space often find themselves comparing EXC and FE — two prominent U.S. utilities with distinct geographic footprints, growth trajectories, and income profiles. Exelon Corporation and FirstEnergy Corp. both operate in a sector defined by predictable cash flows, government-regulated rate structures, and essential-service demand. However, their differing scales, regulatory environments, and capital allocation strategies create meaningful contrasts that can influence portfolio decisions. This stock comparison examines how each company has performed in the current market environment, what has driven recent sentiment, and how their respective positioning stacks up across key dimensions relevant to income-oriented and growth-conscious investors alike.
EXC, headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, is a pure-play regulated utility holding company serving more than 10 million electric and natural gas customers through its subsidiaries — ComEd in Illinois, PECO in Pennsylvania, BGE in Maryland, and Pepco Holdings (PHI) across the Mid-Atlantic region. With a market capitalization approaching $47 billion and annual revenues exceeding $23 billion, Exelon ranks among the largest electric utilities in the United States.
In recent weeks, Exelon's stock has navigated mixed sentiment following its second-quarter earnings report. The company posted GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) net income of $0.39 per share, down from $0.45 in the same period a year earlier, while adjusted operating earnings also declined year-over-year. The primary headwinds included the timing of distribution earnings at ComEd, elevated storm costs at PECO — which experienced one of its largest outage events in recent history affecting over 325,000 customers — and higher interest expenses. On a more positive note, management reaffirmed its full-year 2025 adjusted operating earnings guidance of $2.64 to $2.74 per share and maintained its long-term compounded annual EPS growth target of 5–7% through 2028. Exelon's $38 billion four-year capital investment plan, focused on grid modernization, transmission expansion, and data center load growth, continues to underpin the company's rate base growth narrative.
FE, headquartered in Akron, Ohio, operates as a diversified regulated electric utility serving approximately six million customers across Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, West Virginia, Maryland, and New York. The company operates through three segments — Distribution, Integrated, and Stand-Alone Transmission — and maintains over 252,000 miles of distribution lines and 24,000 miles of transmission infrastructure. With a market capitalization in the range of $23–28 billion, FirstEnergy is meaningfully smaller than Exelon but has demonstrated compelling earnings momentum in recent periods.
FirstEnergy's recent quarterly results have painted a stronger near-term picture. The company reported second-quarter GAAP earnings of $0.46 per share, a sharp improvement from $0.08 per share in the prior-year period, while Core (non-GAAP) earnings reached $0.52 per share, modestly ahead of the $0.51 posted a year earlier. Year-to-date Core earnings of $1.19 per share represented a 19% increase compared to the first half of 2024. Key drivers include new base rate approvals in Pennsylvania that took effect in January 2025, growth in transmission rate base under formula rate programs, and lower operating expenses. The company affirmed its full-year Core earnings guidance of $2.40 to $2.60 per share and its 6–8% compounded annual growth target through 2029, supported by its $28 billion Energize365 capital investment program. FirstEnergy's dividend yield, historically above 4%, remains an attractive feature for income-focused investors.
For traders and investors seeking to supplement their own analysis with algorithm-driven insights, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a place in this featured section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles — from short-term swing trading to longer-duration trend-following strategies — and each comes with its own performance statistics, historical track record, and set of traded tickers. The bots' real-time adaptability and data-driven decision-making can serve as a valuable complement to fundamental research. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help investors identify which automated strategies are currently resonating with market conditions.
While EXC and FE both operate in the regulated electric utility sector and share exposure to similar macroeconomic themes — including electrification, grid reliability spending, and data center load growth — their differences are substantial and meaningful for relative performance.
Scale and Diversification: Exelon is the larger entity by a wide margin, with roughly double FirstEnergy's revenue base and a broader customer footprint spanning major metropolitan markets such as Chicago, Philadelphia, and Baltimore. This scale provides diversification benefits but also exposes Exelon to a wider array of regulatory jurisdictions, each with its own political and rate-setting dynamics. FirstEnergy's more concentrated Mid-Atlantic and Midwest footprint can be a double-edged sword — less diversification but potentially more focused regulatory engagement.
Growth Trajectory: FirstEnergy currently holds an edge in projected earnings growth, guiding for 6–8% annual Core EPS expansion through 2029, compared with Exelon's 5–7% target through 2028. FirstEnergy's year-to-date Core earnings growth of 19% in the first half of 2025 also outpaces Exelon's comparable performance, partly reflecting successful rate case outcomes in Pennsylvania and disciplined cost management.
Valuation and Income: Exelon trades at a lower P/E multiple — approximately 15–16 times forward earnings — compared with FirstEnergy's roughly 21–25 times, making Exelon appear relatively cheaper on an earnings basis. However, FirstEnergy compensates with a higher dividend yield of approximately 4.0–4.4% versus Exelon's roughly 3.7%, and a 25-year track record of consistent dividend growth.
Risk Factors: Exelon's near-term challenges include storm-related cost recovery at PECO, the timing of distribution earnings at ComEd, and evolving regulatory frameworks in Maryland. FirstEnergy carries risks tied to its corporate governance history, credit ratings that remain below some peers, and its exposure to Ohio's regulatory environment. Both companies face sector-wide headwinds from rising interest costs and the capital demands of grid modernization.
Market Sentiment: Both stocks have generated positive total returns over the past year, broadly in line with the regulated utility sector. Sentiment toward FirstEnergy has been buoyed by its improving earnings trajectory and successful execution of rate case strategies, while Exelon's more mixed quarterly results have tempered enthusiasm despite its longer-term growth story centered on data center demand and transmission investment.
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely tilt in favor of FE in the current market environment — though with important qualifications. FirstEnergy's stronger near-term earnings trajectory, higher projected growth rate, and favorable dividend yield profile present a combination of momentum and income characteristics that algorithmic models often reward. The stock's Core EPS growth of 19% in the first half of 2025 and the successful implementation of new rate structures across multiple states indicate a company executing well against its strategic plan. That said, EXC remains a formidable counterpart — its lower valuation multiple, larger scale, and substantial $38 billion capital program offer a compelling value-oriented case that could attract AI strategies favoring mean reversion or relative undervaluation. The AI verdict is probabilistic, not definitive; under different market regimes — particularly those favoring value over momentum — the assessment could shift. Investors should weigh these AI-informed observations alongside their own research, risk tolerance, and investment objectives.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EXC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFE’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EXC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FE’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
EXC (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +1.05% price change this week, while FE (@Electric Utilities) price change was +0.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.24%.
EXC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
FE is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| EXC | FE | EXC / FE | |
| Capitalization | 48.4B | 28.5B | 170% |
| EBITDA | 9.19B | 4.35B | 211% |
| Gain YTD | 10.423 | 12.751 | 82% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.32 | 26.90 | 64% |
| Revenue | 24.8B | 15.5B | 160% |
| Total Cash | 713M | 52M | 1,371% |
| Total Debt | 51.2B | 28.1B | 182% |
EXC | FE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 33 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FE's Valuation (15) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as EXC (32). This means that FE’s stock grew similarly to EXC’s over the last 12 months.
EXC's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FE (30). This means that EXC’s stock grew similarly to FE’s over the last 12 months.
EXC's SMR Rating (73) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FE (77). This means that EXC’s stock grew similarly to FE’s over the last 12 months.
FE's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as EXC (38). This means that FE’s stock grew similarly to EXC’s over the last 12 months.
FE's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as EXC (39). This means that FE’s stock grew similarly to EXC’s over the last 12 months.
| EXC | FE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 16 days ago 37% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 34% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 43% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EXC has been closely correlated with FE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EXC jumps, then FE could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FE has been closely correlated with PPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FE jumps, then PPL could also see price increases.