FDS
Price
$267.00
Change
-$5.11 (-1.88%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.18B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ICE
Price
$153.65
Change
+$0.87 (+0.57%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
87.61B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDS vs ICE

Header iconFDS vs ICE Comparison
Open Charts FDS vs ICEBanner chart's image
Factset Research Systems
Price$267.00
Change-$5.11 (-1.88%)
Volume$7.09K
Capitalization10.18B
Intercontinental Exchange
Price$153.65
Change+$0.87 (+0.57%)
Volume$30.83K
Capitalization87.61B
FDS vs ICE Comparison Chart in %
FDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ICE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDS vs. ICE commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a Hold and ICE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (FDS: $272.11 vs. ICE: $152.78)
Brand notoriety: FDS and ICE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 92% vs. ICE: 134%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $9.99B vs. ICE: $87.61B
FDS [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $9.99B. ICE’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $87.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $148.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileICE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ICE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the long-term than ICE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ICE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the short-term than ICE.

Price Growth

FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +0.20% price change this week, while ICE (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +0.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Dec 18, 2025.

ICE is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.89% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICE($87.6B) has a higher market cap than FDS($10.2B). ICE has higher P/E ratio than FDS: ICE (27.99) vs FDS (17.50). ICE YTD gains are higher at: 3.383 vs. FDS (-42.912). ICE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.56B vs. FDS (966M). ICE has more cash in the bank: 2.2B vs. FDS (355M). FDS has less debt than ICE: FDS (1.56B) vs ICE (19.5B). ICE has higher revenues than FDS: ICE (12.5B) vs FDS (2.32B).
FDSICEFDS / ICE
Capitalization10.2B87.6B12%
EBITDA966M6.56B15%
Gain YTD-42.9123.383-1,268%
P/E Ratio17.5027.9963%
Revenue2.32B12.5B19%
Total Cash355M2.2B16%
Total Debt1.56B19.5B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs ICE: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
ICE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
411
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
3364
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6562
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9274
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDS's Valuation (31) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ICE (63) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDS (100) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's SMR Rating (33) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ICE (64) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FDS (65) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

ICE's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FDS (92) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSICE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ICE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHR25.160.05
+0.20%
Schwab Intermediate-Term US Trs ETF™
MICFF5.40N/A
N/A
Mint Income Fund
DIEM32.85-0.11
-0.34%
Franklin Emerging Mkt Core Div TltIdxETF
PTIN30.63-0.30
-0.98%
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
EWI51.81-0.75
-1.43%
iShares MSCI Italy ETF

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been loosely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
-0.56%
MORN - FDS
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
SPGI - FDS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
MCO - FDS
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
NDAQ - FDS
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
ICE - FDS
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
More