FDS
Price
$222.51
Change
+$4.36 (+2.00%)
Updated
Jun 24, 03:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.95B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MSCI
Price
$584.72
Change
+$3.21 (+0.55%)
Updated
Jun 24, 03:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
42.33B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDS vs MSCI

FDS vs MSCI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDS vs. MSCI commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a StrongBuy and MSCI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (FDS: $218.15 vs. MSCI: $581.51)
Brand notoriety: FDS and MSCI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 115% vs. MSCI: 109%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $7.95B vs. MSCI: $42.33B
FDS [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $7.95B. MSCI’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $42.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $118.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $36.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSCI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSCI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSCI is a better buy in the long-term than FDS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSCI’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MSCI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the short-term than MSCI.

Price Growth

FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -8.17% price change this week, while MSCI (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -4.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Jul 01, 2026.

MSCI is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.00% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSCI($42.3B) has a higher market cap than FDS($7.95B). MSCI has higher P/E ratio than FDS: MSCI (33.17) vs FDS (14.07). MSCI YTD gains are higher at: 2.123 vs. FDS (-24.068). MSCI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2B vs. FDS (978M). MSCI has more cash in the bank: 382M vs. FDS (28.9M). FDS has less debt than MSCI: FDS (1.55B) vs MSCI (6.55B). MSCI has higher revenues than FDS: MSCI (3.24B) vs FDS (2.4B).
FDSMSCIFDS / MSCI
Capitalization7.95B42.3B19%
EBITDA978M2B49%
Gain YTD-24.0682.123-1,134%
P/E Ratio14.0733.1742%
Revenue2.4B3.24B74%
Total Cash28.9M382M8%
Total Debt1.55B6.55B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs MSCI: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
MSCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7977
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
356
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9465
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSCI's Valuation (6) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (15). This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (100). This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's SMR Rating (6) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (35). This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (62). This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (94). This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSMSCI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MSCI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TBI6.440.14
+2.22%
Trueblue
SKY83.721.77
+2.16%
Champion Homes Inc
MSEX52.851.07
+2.07%
Middlesex Water Company
ABEV3.160.02
+0.64%
Ambev SA
AIRI3.020.01
+0.33%
Air Industries Group

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been closely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
-0.21%
MORN - FDS
75%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
SPGI - FDS
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
MCO - FDS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
HLI - FDS
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
SCHW - FDS
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
More

MSCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSCI has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MSCI jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSCI
1D Price
Change %
MSCI100%
+0.11%
SPGI - MSCI
68%
Closely correlated
-1.77%
MCO - MSCI
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
MORN - MSCI
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
NDAQ - MSCI
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
JEF - MSCI
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.65%
More