FICO
Price
$1707.10
Change
-$319.90 (-15.78%)
Updated
May 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
31.06B
70 days until earnings call
PANW
Price
$181.28
Change
-$13.20 (-6.79%)
Updated
May 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
90.22B
96 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FICO vs PANW

Header iconFICO vs PANW Comparison
Open Charts FICO vs PANWBanner chart's image
Fair Isaac
Price$1707.10
Change-$319.90 (-15.78%)
Volume$4.3K
Capitalization31.06B
Palo Alto Networks
Price$181.28
Change-$13.20 (-6.79%)
Volume$101.05K
Capitalization90.22B
FICO vs PANW Comparison Chart
Loading...
FICO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PANW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FICO vs. PANW commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FICO is a Buy and PANW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (FICO: $1707.94 vs. PANW: $181.26)
Brand notoriety: FICO: Not notable vs. PANW: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FICO: 463% vs. PANW: 337%
Market capitalization -- FICO: $31.06B vs. PANW: $90.22B
FICO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $31.06B. PANW’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $90.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FICO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePANW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FICO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PANW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FICO and PANW are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FICO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PANW’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FICO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PANW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PANW is a better buy in the short-term than FICO.

Price Growth

FICO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -19.66% price change this week, while PANW (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

FICO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

PANW is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.72% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PANW($90.2B) has a higher market cap than FICO($31.1B). FICO has higher P/E ratio than PANW: FICO (70.12) vs PANW (43.23). PANW YTD gains are higher at: -0.385 vs. FICO (-14.214). PANW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.15B vs. FICO (676M). PANW has more cash in the bank: 3.37B vs. FICO (160M). FICO has less debt than PANW: FICO (1.99B) vs PANW (2.18B). PANW has higher revenues than FICO: PANW (7.53B) vs FICO (1.55B).
FICOPANWFICO / PANW
Capitalization31.1B90.2B34%
EBITDA676M1.15B59%
Gain YTD-14.214-0.3853,695%
P/E Ratio70.1243.23162%
Revenue1.55B7.53B21%
Total Cash160M3.37B5%
Total Debt1.99B2.18B91%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FICO vs PANW: Fundamental Ratings
FICO
PANW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2427
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
139
SMR RATING
1..100
1040
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
326
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PANW's Valuation (85) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as FICO (92) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to FICO’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as FICO (13) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to FICO’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's SMR Rating (10) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PANW (40) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PANW (47) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as FICO (32) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to FICO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FICOPANW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FICO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PANW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNAZ7.940.93
+13.27%
TransCode Therapeutics Inc
ZENV1.31N/A
N/A
Zenvia
PNR97.33-2.44
-2.45%
Pentair plc
UWMC3.97-0.27
-6.37%
UWM Holdings Corp
PENN14.20-1.00
-6.58%
PENN Entertainment

FICO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICO has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FICO jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FICO
1D Price
Change %
FICO100%
-15.74%
QTWO - FICO
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.01%
DSGX - FICO
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
PANW - FICO
54%
Loosely correlated
-6.80%
ADSK - FICO
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
CPAY - FICO
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.76%
More

PANW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CYBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CYBR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PANW
1D Price
Change %
PANW100%
-6.80%
CYBR - PANW
67%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
ZS - PANW
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
DSGX - PANW
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
CRWD - PANW
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.70%
ADSK - PANW
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
More