Investors seeking exposure to well-managed regional banks frequently encounter FMBH (First Mid Bancshares, Inc.) and SRCE (1st Source Corporation) as two compelling names in the Midwest banking landscape. Both institutions have deep roots in their respective communities — First Mid tracing back to 1865 in Illinois and 1st Source to 1863 in Indiana — and each has demonstrated an ability to grow through disciplined lending, diversified revenue streams, and shareholder-friendly capital allocation. This stock comparison examines how these two regional banks stack up across profitability, growth momentum, risk characteristics, and market positioning, offering a data-driven perspective for traders and investors evaluating opportunities in the regional banking sector.
FMBH, headquartered in Mattoon, Illinois, operates as the parent company of First Mid Bank & Trust, alongside wealth management, insurance, and agricultural services divisions. With approximately $9.3 billion in total assets, the bank serves customers across Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Texas, and Wisconsin. A defining development in recent months has been the completed merger of Two Rivers Bank & Trust into First Mid Bank & Trust, which expanded the company's footprint and contributed meaningfully to second-quarter results. In its Q2 2026 earnings release on July 23, the company reported adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $1.26, comfortably exceeding the consensus estimate of $1.05. Net interest margin (NIM) — the spread between what the bank earns on loans and pays on deposits — expanded to 3.79% on a tax-equivalent basis.
The company also executed a planned leadership succession, with Matthew Smith assuming the CEO role on July 1, 2026, while long-time leader Joseph Dively transitioned to Executive Chairman. This orderly transition has been well-received by the market. The Board declared a $0.01 increase in the quarterly dividend to $0.26 per share, reflecting a payout ratio of roughly 25.5%. Analyst sentiment leans positive, with Piper Sandler recently raising its price target to $62.50 (overweight rating) and the broader consensus rating sitting at "Moderate Buy." Shares have climbed approximately 36% year-to-date, recently touching a new 52-week high above $53.00.
SRCE, based in South Bend, Indiana, operates through its wholly owned subsidiary, 1st Source Bank, providing commercial and consumer banking, specialty finance, wealth management, and insurance services across Indiana, Michigan, and Florida. The bank's specialty finance division sets it apart from many regional peers, encompassing aircraft financing, construction equipment leasing, heavy-duty truck lending, and a growing renewable energy portfolio that reached approximately $713 million in loans by early 2026. With roughly $9.1 billion in total assets, SRCE has generated five consecutive years of record net income, including a 19.3% year-over-year increase in full-year 2025 earnings.
For Q2 2026, SRCE reported EPS of $1.95, beating analyst estimates by roughly 14%, on revenue of $118.2 million. The bank's NIM reached 4.2%, notably stronger than many regional peers, supported by higher rates on investment securities and disciplined deposit cost management. The company also raised its quarterly dividend to $0.43 per share, marking its 38th consecutive year of dividend growth — a streak that underscores long-term capital discipline. SRCE's return on assets (ROA) reached 2.0% in Q2 2026, and its efficiency ratio — a measure of how much revenue is consumed by operating expenses — stood at an impressive 46.6%. Piper Sandler recently raised its price target to $100, and the stock has surged approximately 46% year-to-date, recently trading near $90.30.
In a market environment where regional bank stocks can shift rapidly on interest rate expectations and economic data, many traders are turning to systematic, data-driven tools for decision support. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of top-performing AI trading bots from among hundreds available on the platform, each designed to trade thousands of different tickers using distinct strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters. These bots are filtered to spotlight only those whose recent performance aligns most effectively with current market conditions. Bots accessible through this page vary widely in style — from short-term momentum algorithms to long-horizon value-oriented models — and include transparent statistics such as annualized return rates, win ratios, and trade frequency. Exploring the Trending AI Robots section may offer traders an additional layer of quantitative insight when evaluating how stocks like FMBH and SRCE fit into a broader trading strategy.
While both FMBH and SRCE operate in the Midwest regional banking space, their business models and growth trajectories diverge in notable ways. SRCE's specialty finance vertical — encompassing aircraft, construction, and renewable energy lending — provides a differentiated and scalable revenue stream that extends nationally, whereas FMBH's revenue mix is more heavily weighted toward traditional community banking, Ag services, and wealth management concentrated in its core geographic footprint.
On profitability metrics, SRCE leads decisively. Its net margin of 26.7% and ROA of 2.0% substantially outpace FMBH's net margin of 19.8% and adjusted ROA of 1.45%. SRCE's NIM of 4.2% also exceeds FMBH's 3.79%, reflecting more favorable asset-liability management and a higher-yielding loan portfolio. However, FMBH's recent merger with Two Rivers Bank & Trust introduces a meaningful growth catalyst that could narrow the profitability gap as integration synergies are realized in the coming quarters.
From a risk perspective, SRCE's lower beta of 0.58 versus FMBH's 0.79 indicates less sensitivity to broader market swings, and its larger market capitalization of roughly $2.2 billion provides greater liquidity. FMBH, meanwhile, carries a slightly higher dividend payout ratio at 25.8% versus SRCE's 26.4% — both levels are conservative and well-covered by earnings. SRCE's 38-year streak of annual dividend increases stands out as a testament to consistent capital stewardship. On valuation, both stocks trade at similar forward P/E (price-to-earnings) multiples around 12–13 times earnings, suggesting the market prices neither at a significant premium relative to the other on an earnings basis, despite SRCE's superior profitability metrics.
Based on observable fundamentals and trend consistency, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely lean in favor of SRCE in the current market environment. The combination of a wider net interest margin, higher return on assets, superior efficiency ratio, and a 38-year track record of uninterrupted dividend growth provides a stronger foundation of trend stability and profitability. SRCE's specialty finance business lines also serve as built-in diversification, which may reduce sensitivity to localized economic stress. That said, FMBH presents a compelling turnaround and growth narrative through its merger integration and new leadership, and a probabilistic AI model might assign it a higher potential upside if execution milestones are met. The relative choice, as always, depends on the specific objectives and time horizon embedded in any trading or investment strategy. Neither stock is without risk, and both warrant ongoing monitoring as macroeconomic conditions evolve.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FMBH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSRCE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FMBH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRCE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FMBH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.14% price change this week, while SRCE (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.85%.
FMBH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
SRCE is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| FMBH | SRCE | FMBH / SRCE | |
| Capitalization | 1.39B | 2.16B | 64% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.138 | 45.306 | 78% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.93 | 12.88 | 100% |
| Revenue | 355M | 453M | 78% |
| Total Cash | 16.1M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 383M | 231M | 166% |
FMBH | SRCE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SRCE's Valuation (70) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (96). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.
SRCE's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBH (54). This means that SRCE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.
SRCE's SMR Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (52). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.
SRCE's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (40). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.
SRCE's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (31). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.
| FMBH | SRCE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 59% | 7 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 5 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 45% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BOUT | 46.24 | 0.25 | +0.54% |
| CapForce IBD® Breakout Opportunities ETF | |||
| NAUG | 31.95 | 0.10 | +0.31% |
| Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Aug | |||
| BAIG | 20.22 | N/A | N/A |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long Bbai Daily ETF | |||
| HTD | 25.76 | -0.07 | -0.27% |
| John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund | |||
| TOLZ | 59.77 | -0.42 | -0.70% |
| ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infras | |||