SRCE
Price
$89.74
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.16B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
THFF
Price
$80.55
Change
-$0.29 (-0.36%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
957.89M
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SRCE vs THFF

SRCE vs THFF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) vs. First Financial Corporation (THFF) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • SRCE and THFF are both Indiana-based regional banks, but SRCE operates at roughly double the market capitalization and revenue base of THFF.
  • SRCE delivered a standout Q2 2026 earnings beat with EPS of $1.95 against a $1.71 consensus, while THFF also beat on EPS ($1.91 vs. $1.81 expected) but missed slightly on revenue.
  • THFF's recent acquisition of CedarStone Financial boosted its loan portfolio by $292 million, driving 11 consecutive quarters of loan growth and a net interest margin (the spread between interest earned on loans and interest paid on deposits) of 4.33%.
  • SRCE boasts 33 consecutive years of dividend increases and a return on average assets (ROA — a measure of how efficiently a bank uses its assets to generate profit) of 2.0%, placing it among the more profitable regional banks in its peer group.
  • Year-to-date through late July 2026, SRCE shares had gained approximately 46%, notably outpacing THFF's roughly 35% advance, though both have outperformed the broader regional banking index.
  • Both stocks carry low beta (a measure of volatility relative to the broader market), making them potentially attractive to income-oriented and risk-conscious investors seeking exposure to the Midwest banking sector.

Introduction

Regional banks occupy a unique space in the financial landscape — they are deeply embedded in their local economies yet must navigate the same interest rate, regulatory, and credit cycles as national institutions. SRCE (1st Source Corporation) and THFF (First Financial Corporation) both trace their roots to Indiana and have built multi-state footprints through disciplined lending and strategic growth. This comparison is relevant for investors evaluating regional bank exposure, income-focused portfolios seeking reliable dividends, and traders watching for relative momentum shifts within the Midwest banking sub-sector. By examining recent performance, fundamentals, and market positioning, we aim to clarify how these two institutions stack up in the current environment.

SRCE Overview and Recent Performance

1st Source Corporation, headquartered in South Bend, Indiana, operates through its wholly owned subsidiary 1st Source Bank and provides commercial and consumer banking, wealth advisory, and insurance services across Indiana, Michigan, and Florida. With roots dating to 1863, the company has built a diversified business that includes specialty finance verticals such as aircraft, construction equipment, and auto lending. In recent market activity, SRCE has demonstrated notable momentum. The company's Q2 2026 results, reported in late July, delivered earnings of $1.95 per share — handily exceeding the consensus estimate of $1.71 — on revenue of $118.2 million, which also topped Wall Street expectations. Net interest income grew 9.3% year-over-year to $93.14 million, supported by a net interest margin of 4.2%.

Sentiment around SRCE has been bolstered by an ROA of 2.0% in the most recent quarter, a metric that stands out among regional peers and signals efficient asset utilization. Piper Sandler recently raised its price target on SRCE to $100 from $88, citing stronger net interest income, resilient margins, and growing fee-based revenue. The company has also raised its quarterly dividend to $0.43 per share — marking its 33rd consecutive year of dividend increases — and maintains a conservative payout ratio of roughly 26%. With a beta of 0.58 and a year-to-date gain of approximately 46% through late July, SRCE has attracted attention as both a momentum play and a stability-oriented holding in the regional banking space.

THFF Overview and Recent Performance

First Financial Corporation, headquartered in Terre Haute, Indiana, serves as the holding company for First Financial Bank N.A., which holds the distinction of being the fifth oldest national bank in the United States. The company operates 79 banking centers across Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Georgia, offering a full suite of commercial lending, mortgage, consumer banking, trust, and insurance services. A defining event in THFF's recent trajectory has been the completion of its acquisition of CedarStone Financial on March 1, 2026, which added approximately $292 million in loans and $313 million in deposits to its balance sheet. This transaction helped propel average total loans to $4.45 billion in Q2 2026, a 14.83% year-over-year increase.

THFF reported Q2 2026 earnings of $1.91 per share, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.71 by 11.7%, while revenue of $71.87 million came in slightly below the expected $72.67 million. The bank's net interest margin of 4.33% is among the stronger readings in the regional bank universe and reflects effective loan pricing in a competitive rate environment. Return on average assets reached 1.48% for the quarter, up from 1.34% a year earlier, and the company marked its eleventh consecutive quarter of loan growth. Management has emphasized organic expansion in commercial construction, commercial real estate, and consumer auto lending. One area warranting attention is nonperforming loans, which rose to $27.1 million as of June 30, 2026, compared with $9.8 million a year earlier — a figure linked in part to the acquired CedarStone portfolio and worth monitoring going forward.

Trending AI Robots

For traders and investors seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and forex, but only the strongest performers — those demonstrating consistency, adaptability, and alignment with current market dynamics — earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots employ a wide range of trading styles: some operate on short-term technical patterns, others focus on momentum breakouts, and many incorporate fundamental and sentiment-based signals into their decision-making. Performance statistics vary by bot, with certain models showcasing win rates above 70% and annualized returns that can exceed 20-30% in favorable conditions. Each bot is fully transparent about its strategy, timeframe, historical track record, and the specific tickers it trades. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify AI-driven strategies that align with your trading objectives.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Although SRCE and THFF share the same industry classification and a common Indiana heritage, several structural differences set them apart. Size is the most immediate contrast: SRCE commands a market capitalization of approximately $2.17 billion, more than double THFF's roughly $948 million, and generates annual revenue in the range of $420-$600 million versus THFF's $250-$350 million. This scale advantage gives SRCE greater resources for technology investment, specialty lending verticals, and wealth management capabilities — all of which contribute to its superior ROA of 2.0% compared with THFF's 1.48%.

On profitability metrics, THFF holds an edge in net interest margin at 4.33% versus SRCE's 4.2%, reflecting its ability to price loans attractively within its regional footprint. THFF's acquisition-driven growth strategy — exemplified by the CedarStone deal — contrasts with SRCE's predominantly organic expansion model, which leans on specialized lending niches such as aircraft and construction equipment financing. From a risk perspective, THFF's higher nonperforming loan balance post-acquisition introduces an element of credit uncertainty that SRCE does not currently face to the same degree. Dividend investors may note that while both companies offer attractive yields — SRCE at approximately 2.1% and THFF at roughly 2.85% — SRCE's 33-year streak of consecutive dividend increases and lower payout ratio provide a longer and arguably more durable track record of returning capital to shareholders. In terms of recent stock price momentum, SRCE has meaningfully outpaced THFF year-to-date, suggesting stronger market conviction in its earnings trajectory and capital return story.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable market data and trend analysis, Tickeron's AI-driven framework would likely express a preference for SRCE in the current environment. The reasoning centers on several converging factors: SRCE's superior return on assets, a substantially larger earnings beat in the most recent quarter, stronger year-to-date price momentum, and a multi-decade track record of dividend growth that signals both financial durability and shareholder-friendly governance. The company's lower credit risk profile and diverse specialty lending verticals further differentiate it within the regional banking landscape. That said, THFF retains meaningful structural advantages — including a higher net interest margin, a successful acquisition integration narrative, and an attractive dividend yield — which could narrow the performance gap if credit trends stabilize and organic loan growth continues. This assessment reflects a probabilistic evaluation of relative positioning and trend consistency rather than a definitive forecast, and market conditions can shift rapidly. Investors are encouraged to consider how each stock's characteristics align with their individual objectives and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SRCE vs. THFF commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRCE is a StrongBuy and THFF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (SRCE: $89.74 vs. THFF: $80.55)
Brand notoriety: SRCE and THFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SRCE: 46% vs. THFF: 41%
Market capitalization -- SRCE: $2.16B vs. THFF: $957.89M
SRCE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.16B. THFF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $957.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRCE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTHFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SRCE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • THFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, THFF is a better buy in the long-term than SRCE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRCE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SRCE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • THFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SRCE and THFF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SRCE (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.54% price change this week, while THFF (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

SRCE is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

THFF is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRCE($2.16B) has a higher market cap than THFF($958M). SRCE has higher P/E ratio than THFF: SRCE (12.88) vs THFF (11.28). SRCE YTD gains are higher at: 45.306 vs. THFF (36.753). THFF has less debt than SRCE: THFF (209M) vs SRCE (231M). SRCE has higher revenues than THFF: SRCE (453M) vs THFF (268M).
SRCETHFFSRCE / THFF
Capitalization2.16B958M225%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD45.30636.753123%
P/E Ratio12.8811.28114%
Revenue453M268M169%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt231M209M111%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRCE vs THFF: Fundamental Ratings
SRCE
THFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8886
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
109
SMR RATING
1..100
4147
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3839
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2938
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

THFF's Valuation (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SRCE (70). This means that THFF’s stock grew similarly to SRCE’s over the last 12 months.

THFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SRCE (10). This means that THFF’s stock grew similarly to SRCE’s over the last 12 months.

SRCE's SMR Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as THFF (47). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to THFF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCE's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as THFF (39). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to THFF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCE's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as THFF (38). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to THFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SRCETHFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SRCE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
THFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JADE76.270.44
+0.58%
JPMorgan Active Developing Mkts Eq ETF
SPGM85.080.19
+0.22%
State Street® SPDR® Ptf MSCIGlbStkMktETF
TAXX50.48-0.01
-0.03%
BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Awr Shrt Dur ETF
NSI37.39-0.02
-0.04%
National Security Emerging Mkts Idx ETF
TSXU51.27-0.23
-0.46%
Direxion Daily Smndctrs Top 5 Bull 2XETF

SRCE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRCE has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SRCE jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRCE
1D Price
Change %
SRCE100%
N/A
PEBO - SRCE
89%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
MBWM - SRCE
87%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
THFF - SRCE
87%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
PRK - SRCE
85%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
SHBI - SRCE
85%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
More

THFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THFF has been closely correlated with SRCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if THFF jumps, then SRCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THFF
1D Price
Change %
THFF100%
-0.36%
SRCE - THFF
87%
Closely correlated
N/A
MBWM - THFF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
SHBI - THFF
86%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
UVSP - THFF
86%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
EFSC - THFF
86%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
More