Regional banks occupy a unique space in the financial landscape — they are deeply embedded in their local economies yet must navigate the same interest rate, regulatory, and credit cycles as national institutions. SRCE (1st Source Corporation) and THFF (First Financial Corporation) both trace their roots to Indiana and have built multi-state footprints through disciplined lending and strategic growth. This comparison is relevant for investors evaluating regional bank exposure, income-focused portfolios seeking reliable dividends, and traders watching for relative momentum shifts within the Midwest banking sub-sector. By examining recent performance, fundamentals, and market positioning, we aim to clarify how these two institutions stack up in the current environment.
1st Source Corporation, headquartered in South Bend, Indiana, operates through its wholly owned subsidiary 1st Source Bank and provides commercial and consumer banking, wealth advisory, and insurance services across Indiana, Michigan, and Florida. With roots dating to 1863, the company has built a diversified business that includes specialty finance verticals such as aircraft, construction equipment, and auto lending. In recent market activity, SRCE has demonstrated notable momentum. The company's Q2 2026 results, reported in late July, delivered earnings of $1.95 per share — handily exceeding the consensus estimate of $1.71 — on revenue of $118.2 million, which also topped Wall Street expectations. Net interest income grew 9.3% year-over-year to $93.14 million, supported by a net interest margin of 4.2%.
Sentiment around SRCE has been bolstered by an ROA of 2.0% in the most recent quarter, a metric that stands out among regional peers and signals efficient asset utilization. Piper Sandler recently raised its price target on SRCE to $100 from $88, citing stronger net interest income, resilient margins, and growing fee-based revenue. The company has also raised its quarterly dividend to $0.43 per share — marking its 33rd consecutive year of dividend increases — and maintains a conservative payout ratio of roughly 26%. With a beta of 0.58 and a year-to-date gain of approximately 46% through late July, SRCE has attracted attention as both a momentum play and a stability-oriented holding in the regional banking space.
First Financial Corporation, headquartered in Terre Haute, Indiana, serves as the holding company for First Financial Bank N.A., which holds the distinction of being the fifth oldest national bank in the United States. The company operates 79 banking centers across Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Georgia, offering a full suite of commercial lending, mortgage, consumer banking, trust, and insurance services. A defining event in THFF's recent trajectory has been the completion of its acquisition of CedarStone Financial on March 1, 2026, which added approximately $292 million in loans and $313 million in deposits to its balance sheet. This transaction helped propel average total loans to $4.45 billion in Q2 2026, a 14.83% year-over-year increase.
THFF reported Q2 2026 earnings of $1.91 per share, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.71 by 11.7%, while revenue of $71.87 million came in slightly below the expected $72.67 million. The bank's net interest margin of 4.33% is among the stronger readings in the regional bank universe and reflects effective loan pricing in a competitive rate environment. Return on average assets reached 1.48% for the quarter, up from 1.34% a year earlier, and the company marked its eleventh consecutive quarter of loan growth. Management has emphasized organic expansion in commercial construction, commercial real estate, and consumer auto lending. One area warranting attention is nonperforming loans, which rose to $27.1 million as of June 30, 2026, compared with $9.8 million a year earlier — a figure linked in part to the acquired CedarStone portfolio and worth monitoring going forward.
For traders and investors seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and forex, but only the strongest performers — those demonstrating consistency, adaptability, and alignment with current market dynamics — earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots employ a wide range of trading styles: some operate on short-term technical patterns, others focus on momentum breakouts, and many incorporate fundamental and sentiment-based signals into their decision-making. Performance statistics vary by bot, with certain models showcasing win rates above 70% and annualized returns that can exceed 20-30% in favorable conditions. Each bot is fully transparent about its strategy, timeframe, historical track record, and the specific tickers it trades. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify AI-driven strategies that align with your trading objectives.
Although SRCE and THFF share the same industry classification and a common Indiana heritage, several structural differences set them apart. Size is the most immediate contrast: SRCE commands a market capitalization of approximately $2.17 billion, more than double THFF's roughly $948 million, and generates annual revenue in the range of $420-$600 million versus THFF's $250-$350 million. This scale advantage gives SRCE greater resources for technology investment, specialty lending verticals, and wealth management capabilities — all of which contribute to its superior ROA of 2.0% compared with THFF's 1.48%.
On profitability metrics, THFF holds an edge in net interest margin at 4.33% versus SRCE's 4.2%, reflecting its ability to price loans attractively within its regional footprint. THFF's acquisition-driven growth strategy — exemplified by the CedarStone deal — contrasts with SRCE's predominantly organic expansion model, which leans on specialized lending niches such as aircraft and construction equipment financing. From a risk perspective, THFF's higher nonperforming loan balance post-acquisition introduces an element of credit uncertainty that SRCE does not currently face to the same degree. Dividend investors may note that while both companies offer attractive yields — SRCE at approximately 2.1% and THFF at roughly 2.85% — SRCE's 33-year streak of consecutive dividend increases and lower payout ratio provide a longer and arguably more durable track record of returning capital to shareholders. In terms of recent stock price momentum, SRCE has meaningfully outpaced THFF year-to-date, suggesting stronger market conviction in its earnings trajectory and capital return story.
Based on observable market data and trend analysis, Tickeron's AI-driven framework would likely express a preference for SRCE in the current environment. The reasoning centers on several converging factors: SRCE's superior return on assets, a substantially larger earnings beat in the most recent quarter, stronger year-to-date price momentum, and a multi-decade track record of dividend growth that signals both financial durability and shareholder-friendly governance. The company's lower credit risk profile and diverse specialty lending verticals further differentiate it within the regional banking landscape. That said, THFF retains meaningful structural advantages — including a higher net interest margin, a successful acquisition integration narrative, and an attractive dividend yield — which could narrow the performance gap if credit trends stabilize and organic loan growth continues. This assessment reflects a probabilistic evaluation of relative positioning and trend consistency rather than a definitive forecast, and market conditions can shift rapidly. Investors are encouraged to consider how each stock's characteristics align with their individual objectives and risk tolerance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SRCE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTHFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SRCE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
SRCE (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.54% price change this week, while THFF (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.
SRCE is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
THFF is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| SRCE | THFF | SRCE / THFF | |
| Capitalization | 2.16B | 958M | 225% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 45.306 | 36.753 | 123% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.88 | 11.28 | 114% |
| Revenue | 453M | 268M | 169% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 231M | 209M | 111% |
SRCE | THFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
THFF's Valuation (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SRCE (70). This means that THFF’s stock grew similarly to SRCE’s over the last 12 months.
THFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SRCE (10). This means that THFF’s stock grew similarly to SRCE’s over the last 12 months.
SRCE's SMR Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as THFF (47). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to THFF’s over the last 12 months.
SRCE's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as THFF (39). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to THFF’s over the last 12 months.
SRCE's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as THFF (38). This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to THFF’s over the last 12 months.
| SRCE | THFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 57% | 6 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 14 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 47% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JADE | 76.27 | 0.44 | +0.58% |
| JPMorgan Active Developing Mkts Eq ETF | |||
| SPGM | 85.08 | 0.19 | +0.22% |
| State Street® SPDR® Ptf MSCIGlbStkMktETF | |||
| TAXX | 50.48 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Awr Shrt Dur ETF | |||
| NSI | 37.39 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| National Security Emerging Mkts Idx ETF | |||
| TSXU | 51.27 | -0.23 | -0.46% |
| Direxion Daily Smndctrs Top 5 Bull 2XETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRCE has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SRCE jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SRCE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRCE | 100% | N/A | ||
| PEBO - SRCE | 89% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| MBWM - SRCE | 87% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| THFF - SRCE | 87% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| PRK - SRCE | 85% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| SHBI - SRCE | 85% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THFF has been closely correlated with SRCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if THFF jumps, then SRCE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To THFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THFF | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| SRCE - THFF | 87% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| MBWM - THFF | 87% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| SHBI - THFF | 86% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| UVSP - THFF | 86% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| EFSC - THFF | 86% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||