It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRGT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTWO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRGT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FRGT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.28% price change this week, while TTWO (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was +3.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.65%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.06%.
TTWO is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Electronics/Appliances (+0.94% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
FRGT | TTWO | FRGT / TTWO | |
Capitalization | 3.49M | 43B | 0% |
EBITDA | -3.82M | -2.87B | 0% |
Gain YTD | -83.224 | 27.608 | -301% |
P/E Ratio | 0.03 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 13.5M | 5.8B | 0% |
Total Cash | 416K | 2.04B | 0% |
Total Debt | 3.81M | 3.51B | 0% |
FRGT | TTWO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 25 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRGT's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTWO (95) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that FRGT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRGT (100) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's SMR Rating (100) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as FRGT (100) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRGT (96) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew significantly faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.
TTWO's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as FRGT (100) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.
FRGT | TTWO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago61% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago60% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 2 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago90% | 15 days ago56% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago65% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago62% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
QDTY | 44.44 | 0.31 | +0.69% |
YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Cove CllStgyETF | |||
CXE | 3.56 | 0.02 | +0.56% |
MFS High Income Municipal Trust | |||
SUSA | 132.41 | 0.44 | +0.33% |
iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF | |||
BCDF | 31.21 | -0.04 | -0.13% |
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Dev ETF | |||
VCV | 10.19 | -0.03 | -0.29% |
INVESCO CALIFORNIA VALUE MUNI Income TRUST |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FRGT and IMMR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRGT and IMMR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FRGT | 100% | -1.68% | ||
IMMR - FRGT | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
TTWO - FRGT | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.24% | ||
XROLF - FRGT | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BMR - FRGT | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.96% | ||
PRCH - FRGT | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTWO has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTWO jumps, then NET could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TTWO | 100% | +1.24% | ||
NET - TTWO | 50% Loosely correlated | +3.99% | ||
COIN - TTWO | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
PANW - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.82% | ||
DOCS - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
CLSK - TTWO | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
More |