FRGT
Price
$1.33
Change
+$0.04 (+3.10%)
Updated
May 9, 01:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.05M
TTWO
Price
$225.45
Change
-$0.89 (-0.39%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
25.33B
6 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FRGT vs TTWO

Header iconFRGT vs TTWO Comparison
Open Charts FRGT vs TTWOBanner chart's image
Freight Technologies
Price$1.33
Change+$0.04 (+3.10%)
Volume$129
Capitalization3.05M
Take-Two Interactive Software
Price$225.45
Change-$0.89 (-0.39%)
Volume$1.77M
Capitalization25.33B
FRGT vs TTWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRGT vs. TTWO commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRGT is a StrongBuy and TTWO is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FRGT: $1.29 vs. TTWO: $225.45)
Brand notoriety: FRGT: Not notable vs. TTWO: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRGT: 62% vs. TTWO: 84%
Market capitalization -- FRGT: $3.05M vs. TTWO: $25.33B
FRGT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.05M. TTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $25.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRGT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTWO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRGT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TTWO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTWO is a better buy in the long-term than FRGT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRGT’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTWO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRGT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TTWO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRGT is a better buy in the short-term than TTWO.

Price Growth

FRGT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +30.99% price change this week, while TTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRGT is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2025.

TTWO is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.82% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TTWO($25.3B) has a higher market cap than FRGT($3.05M). TTWO YTD gains are higher at: 22.474 vs. FRGT (-31.746). TTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 561M vs. FRGT (-7.91M). TTWO has more cash in the bank: 922M vs. FRGT (3.15M). FRGT has less debt than TTWO: FRGT (4.49M) vs TTWO (3.53B). TTWO has higher revenues than FRGT: TTWO (5.4B) vs FRGT (24.6M).
FRGTTTWOFRGT / TTWO
Capitalization3.05M25.3B0%
EBITDA-7.91M561M-1%
Gain YTD-31.74622.474-141%
P/E RatioN/A61.73-
Revenue24.6M5.4B0%
Total Cash3.15M922M0%
Total Debt4.49M3.53B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRGT vs TTWO: Fundamental Ratings
FRGT
TTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8816
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10044
SMR RATING
1..100
9894
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
494
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10014
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRGT's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTWO (77) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that FRGT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TTWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRGT (100) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

TTWO's SMR Rating (94) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as FRGT (98) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

TTWO's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRGT (49) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

TTWO's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRGT (100) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew significantly faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRGTTTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRGT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TTGT8.270.38
+4.82%
TechTarget
TPR77.542.79
+3.73%
Tapestry
CAAS4.150.12
+2.98%
China Automotive Systems
WAFD29.040.44
+1.54%
WaFd
LXEH2.95-0.09
-2.96%
Lixiang Education Holding Co Ltd

FRGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRGT and IMMR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRGT and IMMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRGT
1D Price
Change %
FRGT100%
-3.01%
IMMR - FRGT
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
DUOL - FRGT
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
BMR - FRGT
28%
Poorly correlated
-7.29%
TTWO - FRGT
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
XROLF - FRGT
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.62%
More

TTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTWO has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTWO jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTWO
1D Price
Change %
TTWO100%
-0.39%
COIN - TTWO
50%
Loosely correlated
+5.06%
NET - TTWO
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
DOCS - TTWO
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
CLSK - TTWO
46%
Loosely correlated
+8.09%
RIOT - TTWO
46%
Loosely correlated
+7.65%
More