Advertisement
FRSH vs OOMA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Hold and OOMA is a Hold.
| FRSH | OOMA | FRSH / OOMA | |
| Capitalization | 3.1B | 628M | 494% |
| EBITDA | 66.7M | 29.2M | 228% |
| Gain YTD | -2.939 | 94.118 | -3% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.85 | 58.38 | 32% |
| Revenue | 904M | 307M | 294% |
| Total Cash | 664M | 17.5M | 3,794% |
| Total Debt | 34.6M | 60.8M | 57% |
FRSH | OOMA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRSH's Valuation (58) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as OOMA (66) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to OOMA’s over the last 12 months.
OOMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as FRSH (90) in the Restaurants industry. This means that OOMA’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's SMR Rating (47) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as OOMA (65) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to OOMA’s over the last 12 months.
OOMA's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as FRSH (41) in the Restaurants industry. This means that OOMA’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for OOMA (96) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew significantly faster than OOMA’s over the last 12 months.
| FRSH | OOMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 71% | 11 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 70% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while OOMA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- OOMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OOMA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- OOMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.60% price change this week, while OOMA (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
OOMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-4.16% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
OOMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OOMA has been loosely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OOMA jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OOMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OOMA | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| CRM - OOMA | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| FRSH - OOMA | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| OTEX - OOMA | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| NCNO - OOMA | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| WDAY - OOMA | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
More | ||||