FSTA
Price
$52.17
Change
+$0.53 (+1.03%)
Updated
Sep 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.41B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VDC
Price
$225.17
Change
+$2.23 (+1.00%)
Updated
Sep 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
7.76B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSTA vs VDC

FSTA vs VDC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 15, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) vs. Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC)

Key Takeaways

  • Both FSTA and VDC provide passive exposure to the U.S. consumer staples sector through market-capitalization-weighted indexes based on the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS).
  • FSTA tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples 25/50 Index with an expense ratio of 0.08%, while VDC tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index with an expense ratio of 0.09%.
  • FSTA holds approximately 98 stocks and VDC holds approximately 103–108 stocks, with both featuring high concentration in top holdings such as Walmart, Costco, Procter & Gamble, and Coca-Cola.
  • The funds exhibit similar sector allocations dominated by consumer staples merchandise retail, beverages, and household products, with limited exposure outside the core sector.
  • VDC offers greater assets under management and longer track record since 2004, while FSTA launched in 2013 with a marginally lower cost structure.
  • Both ETFs serve as defensive sector vehicles suited for investors seeking stability from essential consumer goods amid varying economic cycles.

Introduction

Consumer staples exchange-traded funds (ETFs) attract attention during periods of economic uncertainty because they focus on companies providing essential goods such as food, beverages, and household products. FSTA and VDC compete directly by delivering similar market-cap-weighted exposure to the same broad sector. Investors often compare them when evaluating cost efficiency, diversification within staples, and structural features for long-term portfolio allocation rather than short-term trading.

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) Overview

FSTA is a passive ETF that seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples 25/50 Index before fees and expenses. The fund holds approximately 98 stocks and maintains a market-capitalization weighting approach with capping rules to comply with diversification requirements. Top holdings typically include Walmart, Costco Wholesale, Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola, and Philip Morris International. Sector allocations concentrate in consumer staples merchandise retail, beverages, and household products. The expense ratio stands at 0.08%. Launched in 2013, the ETF uses physical replication and distributes dividends quarterly.

Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) Overview

VDC is a passive ETF designed to track the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. It holds approximately 103–108 stocks and applies market-capitalization weighting with similar capping constraints. Top holdings mirror those of comparable staples funds, featuring Walmart, Costco Wholesale, Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola, and Philip Morris International. Allocations emphasize merchandise retail, soft drinks, and household products within the consumer staples sector. The expense ratio is 0.09%. The fund launched in 2004, employs physical replication, and pays dividends quarterly.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The consumer staples sector encompasses companies producing or distributing everyday necessities that exhibit relatively stable demand across economic conditions. Macroeconomic drivers include consumer spending patterns, inflation effects on input costs, interest rate environments influencing borrowing for retailers, and shifts in commodity prices for agricultural and packaging inputs. Regulatory developments around food safety, labeling, and environmental standards can affect operations. Capital flows into defensive sectors often increase during market volatility or slowing growth periods, while risks include changing consumer preferences toward value brands and potential margin pressure from rising wages or supply chain disruptions.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Both ETFs have demonstrated resilience in recent market cycles due to their focus on defensive staples companies with consistent earnings profiles. Relative positioning shows modest differences stemming from slight variations in holdings count and index construction details. FSTA may exhibit marginally lower costs that support long-term compounding, while VDC benefits from greater scale and liquidity. Volatility differences remain limited given the shared sector focus, with performance influenced by sector rotation toward or away from staples during earnings seasons and broader macroeconomic shifts such as interest rate expectations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your investment research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to FSTA due to its slightly lower expense ratio and comparable diversification profile within the consumer staples sector. VDC remains a strong alternative given its larger scale and established history. Selection ultimately depends on investor preferences for cost versus liquidity in similar sector exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FSTA vs. VDC commentary
Sep 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTA is a Hold and VDC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VDC has more net assets: 7.76B vs. FSTA (1.41B). FSTA (6.162) and VDC (6.107) have matching annual dividend yield . FSTA was incepted earlier than VDC: FSTA (13 years) vs VDC (23 years). FSTA (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than VDC (0.09). FSTA has a higher turnover VDC (9.00) vs VDC (9.00).
FSTAVDCFSTA / VDC
Gain YTD6.1626.107101%
Net Assets1.41B7.76B18%
Total Expense Ratio0.080.0993%
Turnover13.009.00144%
Yield2.182.09104%
Fund Existence13 years23 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSTAVDC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
FSTA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VDC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BWG7.320.04
+0.55%
BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund
PBFB32.690.13
+0.40%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB)
ACYS20.590.05
+0.24%
FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS)
RKNG25.19N/A
N/A
Defiance Retail Kings ETF
GTO45.42-0.09
-0.19%
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO)

FSTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSTA has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSTA jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSTA
1D Price
Change %
FSTA100%
-0.41%
CL - FSTA
70%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
WMT - FSTA
70%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
PG - FSTA
69%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
PEP - FSTA
67%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
CHD - FSTA
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
More

VDC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VDC has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VDC jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VDC
1D Price
Change %
VDC100%
-0.27%
CL - VDC
71%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
WMT - VDC
70%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
PG - VDC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
PEP - VDC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
CHD - VDC
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
More