Advertisement
FTS vs PNW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Fortis Inc. (FTS) vs. Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (PNW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both FTS and PNW operate in the regulated utilities sector, offering defensive characteristics amid market volatility.
- FTS demonstrates greater stability with a low beta of 0.13, compared to PNW's 0.47, making it less sensitive to market swings.
- Recent market activity shows FTS with modest weekly gains of 0.47% and yearly increase of 14.04%, while PNW posted stronger short-term rises of 1.70% weekly.
- FTS benefits from geographic diversification across Canada, the U.S., and the Caribbean, contrasting PNW's Arizona-centric operations.
- Tickeron's AI tools highlight utilities' role in portfolios, with FTS edging out on trend consistency.
Introduction
This stock comparison pits FTS against PNW, two established players in the utilities sector known for steady dividends and resilience during economic uncertainty. Investors seeking defensive positions or income-focused strategies may find value in evaluating their relative performance, growth drivers, and risk profiles. Amid recent market rotations toward value sectors, utilities like these offer stability, but regional exposures and operational catalysts differentiate their trajectories. This analysis draws on recent financial metrics and market data to illuminate key contrasts for informed decision-making in today's environment.
FTS Overview and Recent Performance
Fortis Inc. (FTS) is a leading North American utility holding company engaged in electricity generation, transmission, and distribution, alongside natural gas operations across Canada, the U.S., and the Caribbean. Its regulated model ensures predictable cash flows. In recent weeks, FTS shares have exhibited modest gains, rising 0.47% over the past week and 14.04% over the last year, reflecting investor preference for its stability amid broader market fluctuations. Key influences include solid Q4 2025 earnings per share (EPS, a measure of profitability per share) of $0.65, beating estimates, and a profit margin of 14.78%. Sentiment remains positive due to its low beta of 0.13 and long-term total shareholder return (TSR) of 9.5% annualized over 20 years, underscoring consistent performance.
PNW Overview and Recent Performance
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (PNW) primarily serves Arizona through its subsidiary Arizona Public Service, delivering retail and wholesale electric services. This focused regional presence supports growth tied to local demand. Recent market activity has seen PNW outperform short-term, with a 1.70% weekly increase and 2.67% monthly rise, though it has trailed the broader utilities sector over the past year. Full-year 2025 net income reached $616.5 million or $5.05 EPS, with 2026 guidance at $4.55-$4.75 EPS. Performance drivers include credit facility expansions, but upcoming Q1 earnings introduce near-term uncertainty, tempered by a higher beta of 0.47 signaling greater market sensitivity.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 available models that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These bots deliver real-time signals for copy trading, featuring annualized returns from +23.53% to +163.10% and win rates between 51.30% and 88.33%, with trade durations spanning 1 day to 49 days and profit factors up to 11.70. Tailored for sectors like semiconductors, industrials, and ETFs, they adapt to volatility and trends. Explore these high performers to enhance your trading edge with data-driven insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FTS and PNW share regulated utility business models emphasizing stable revenues, but FTS's multi-regional footprint mitigates risks better than PNW's Arizona exposure, which ties growth to Southwest demand. Recent momentum favors PNW in short-term gains, yet FTS leads in yearly performance and lower volatility (beta 0.13 vs. 0.47). Risk factors include interest rate sensitivity for both, though PNW faces weather-normalized earnings variability. Sector tailwinds like infrastructure spending benefit each, but FTS's diversification and superior long-term TSR position it for steadier sentiment.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward FTS due to its superior trend consistency, lower risk profile, and geographic diversification, which provide a probabilistic edge in uncertain markets over PNW's regional focus and higher beta. This positioning aligns with observable stability and catalysts like earnings beats.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTS is a Hold and PNW is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePNW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PNW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FTS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PNW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FTS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -1.90% price change this week, while PNW (@Electric Utilities) price change was -1.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.06%.
Reported Earning Dates
FTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
PNW is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (-1.15% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| FTS | PNW | FTS / PNW | |
| Capitalization | 28.7B | 12.1B | 237% |
| EBITDA | 5.91B | 2.2B | 268% |
| Gain YTD | 8.491 | 14.661 | 58% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.75 | 18.63 | 122% |
| Revenue | 12.2B | 5.46B | 224% |
| Total Cash | 359M | 6.41M | 5,601% |
| Total Debt | 35.4B | 15.1B | 234% |
FTS | PNW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PNW's Valuation (53) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (61) in the null industry. This means that PNW’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
PNW's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (57) in the null industry. This means that PNW’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
PNW's SMR Rating (72) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (78) in the null industry. This means that PNW’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
PNW's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (52) in the null industry. This means that PNW’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as PNW (45) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to PNW’s over the last 12 months.
| FTS | PNW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 44% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 29% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 34% | 6 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 43% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QULL | 62.27 | 1.63 | +2.69% |
| ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Qlty Fctr TR ETN | |||
| INCM | 29.22 | 0.09 | +0.31% |
| Franklin Income Focus ETF | |||
| RZV | 133.73 | -1.75 | -1.29% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF | |||
| VSOL | 12.60 | -0.41 | -3.15% |
| VanEck Solana ETF | |||
| DLLL | 70.53 | -4.95 | -6.55% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | |||
FTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been closely correlated with ED. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then ED could also see price increases.
PNW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNW has been closely correlated with OGE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNW jumps, then OGE could also see price increases.