FTXL and SOXQ represent compelling options for investors seeking targeted exposure to the booming U.S. semiconductor sector, amid surging demand for AI chips, data center infrastructure, and advanced computing. While both ETFs focus on semiconductor companies, they diverge in strategy: FTXL's factor-based selection promotes diversified exposure to quality names, whereas SOXQ delivers straightforward benchmarking of industry leaders via modified market-cap weighting. This comparison is timely as capital flows intensify into semis, driven by hyperscaler investments exceeding $650 billion in 2026 for AI infrastructure, yet sector rotation and valuation concerns create opportunities for differentiated approaches within this high-growth theme.
The First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) tracks the Nasdaq US Smart Semiconductor™ Index, a modified factor-weighted benchmark selecting 30-50 U.S. semiconductor companies based on liquidity and multi-factor scores including gross income, return on assets (ROA, a profitability measure), momentum, and cash flow. Securities are weighted by cash flow with individual caps at 8% and floors at 0.50%, promoting balance across value, growth, and volatility factors. As of recent data, FTXL holds 34 securities with approximately $1.8 billion in assets under management (AUM, total investor assets in the fund).
Top holdings include INTC (9.72%), AVGO (8.26%), NVDA (7.56%), MU (7.25%), and QCOM (6.39%). Sector allocations tilt toward semiconductors (77.22%) and production technology equipment (22.78%). The expense ratio is 0.60%, with semi-annual rebalancing. This passive, smart beta structure suits investors favoring factor-driven outperformance over pure market-cap weighting.
The Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) tracks the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, a modified market-capitalization-weighted index of the 30 largest U.S.-listed companies engaged in semiconductor design, distribution, manufacture, and sales. Weighting starts with market cap but applies caps: top three at 12%, 10%, and 8% respectively, with others at 4%, ensuring no single stock dominates excessively. The fund invests at least 90% of assets in index securities, maintaining a non-diversified profile.
Recent top holdings feature NVDA (around 12%), AVGO (10%), MU (7%), alongside names like MRVL and AMD, totaling about 31 holdings with over $1.3 billion AUM. Allocations are predominantly semiconductors (76.58%) and production equipment (23.42%). The expense ratio is a low 0.19%, with annual reconstitution in September and quarterly rebalancing. This passive structure appeals to those prioritizing cost efficiency and benchmark fidelity.
The semiconductor sector powers the AI revolution, with global sales projected to hit $975 billion in 2026, up 26% year-over-year, led by generative AI chips comprising nearly 50% of revenues. Catalysts include massive hyperscaler capex—over $650 billion from firms like Microsoft and Amazon—for data centers, alongside high-bandwidth memory (HBM) demand and edge AI growth. Regulatory tailwinds like CHIPS Act grants bolster U.S. manufacturing, while risks encompass U.S.-China trade tensions, export controls, and supply chain shifts. Capital flows favor AI enablers, though cyclical downturns in consumer electronics and automotive chips loom amid high valuations.
In recent months through early 2026, FTXL has edged out SOXQ, with year-to-date gains around 37% versus SOXQ's 28%, attributed to its factor tilt amplifying exposure to recovering names like INTC and MU amid sector rotation from mega-caps. Over broader cycles, both have surged on AI tailwinds, but FTXL's emphasis on cash flow and momentum provides resilience during volatility spikes, while SOXQ's heavier NVDA weighting amplifies upside in growth-led rallies. Volatility profiles remain elevated (betas over 1.6), tied to earnings cycles and interest rate sensitivity, with FTXL showing slightly higher relative strength in diversified semi recoveries.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions in dynamic sectors like semiconductors. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems aligned with your strategy.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors FTXL with moderate conviction (60-70% probability edge), owing to its factor-driven diversification, stronger trend consistency in recent rotations, and balanced risk exposure amid AI momentum broadening beyond top holdings. While SOXQ's cost efficiency shines for pure-play indexing, FTXL's structural tilt toward quality cash generators positions it better for sustained sector cycles.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| FTXL | SOXQ | FTXL / SOXQ | |
| Gain YTD | 109.637 | 90.132 | 122% |
| Net Assets | 2.75B | 2.71B | 102% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.19 | 316% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 24.00 | 79% |
| Yield | 0.13 | 0.28 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 5 years | - |
| FTXL | SOXQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FTA | 96.88 | 0.69 | +0.72% |
| First Trust Large Cap Val AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| GTEK | 59.86 | -0.29 | -0.48% |
| Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Eq ETF | |||
| PFI | 61.01 | -0.34 | -0.55% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momt ETF | |||
| NBET | 38.83 | -0.43 | -1.10% |
| Neuberger Energy Trnstn & Infras ETF | |||
| OKLL | 5.30 | -0.66 | -11.07% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long OKLO ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTXL has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTXL jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTXL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTXL | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| LRCX - FTXL | 86% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| AMAT - FTXL | 82% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| MPWR - FTXL | 82% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| KLAC - FTXL | 81% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| MU - FTXL | 81% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOXQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOXQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOXQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOXQ | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| LRCX - SOXQ | 86% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| KLAC - SOXQ | 83% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| AMAT - SOXQ | 83% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| MPWR - SOXQ | 81% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| MKSI - SOXQ | 80% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
More | ||||