It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FWRD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLSTR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FWRD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LSTR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FWRD (@Other Transportation) experienced а -3.82% price change this week, while LSTR (@Other Transportation) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.10%.
LSTR is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.
Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.
| FWRD | LSTR | FWRD / LSTR | |
| Capitalization | 637M | 4.35B | 15% |
| EBITDA | 250M | 244M | 102% |
| Gain YTD | -36.837 | -24.623 | 150% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.21 | 32.37 | 32% |
| Revenue | 2.52B | 4.78B | 53% |
| Total Cash | 95.1M | 64.5M | 147% |
| Total Debt | 2.16B | 125M | 1,730% |
FWRD | LSTR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 88 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LSTR's Valuation (78) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as FWRD (88) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry. This means that LSTR’s stock grew similarly to FWRD’s over the last 12 months.
LSTR's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as FWRD (100) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry. This means that LSTR’s stock grew similarly to FWRD’s over the last 12 months.
LSTR's SMR Rating (54) in the Trucking industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FWRD (97) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry. This means that LSTR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FWRD’s over the last 12 months.
FWRD's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is in the same range as LSTR (78) in the Trucking industry. This means that FWRD’s stock grew similarly to LSTR’s over the last 12 months.
LSTR's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Trucking industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FWRD (75) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry. This means that LSTR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FWRD’s over the last 12 months.
| FWRD | LSTR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 70% | 18 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 57% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWRD has been closely correlated with XPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWRD jumps, then XPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWRD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWRD | 100% | +3.19% | ||
| XPO - FWRD | 75% Closely correlated | +5.48% | ||
| FDX - FWRD | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.41% | ||
| HUBG - FWRD | 55% Loosely correlated | +4.68% | ||
| LSTR - FWRD | 51% Loosely correlated | +4.16% | ||
| JBHT - FWRD | 48% Loosely correlated | +4.73% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSTR has been closely correlated with HUBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LSTR jumps, then HUBG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSTR | 100% | +4.16% | ||
| HUBG - LSTR | 79% Closely correlated | +4.68% | ||
| JBHT - LSTR | 79% Closely correlated | +4.73% | ||
| XPO - LSTR | 65% Loosely correlated | +5.48% | ||
| EXPD - LSTR | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.55% | ||
| UPS - LSTR | 60% Loosely correlated | +4.17% | ||
More | ||||