FXN vs IYE

Key Takeaways

• FXN uses a multi-factor AlphaDEX selection model with tiered equal-weighting, while IYE is a passive, market-capitalization-weighted fund concentrated in energy megacaps.
• IYE is materially cheaper, with an expense ratio of roughly 0.37%–0.40%, versus about 0.63% for FXN.
• FXN holds roughly 40 names with more balanced weightings; IYE holds around 40–44 names but its top 10 positions account for roughly 70% of assets.
• Both funds are overwhelmingly energy-sector exposure (about 96%–98%), but FXN tilts toward mid-caps and refineries, while IYE leans heavily on integrated oil giants such as Exxon Mobil and Chevron.
• Rebalancing differs: FXN reconstitutes and rebalances quarterly, whereas IYE tracks a cap-weighted index with standard periodic review.
• The funds share similar commodity drivers but present very different concentration, cost, and single-stock risk profiles.

Introduction

Energy remains one of the most closely watched corners of the equity market, shaped by crude oil and natural gas prices, capital discipline, and shifting global supply-and-demand dynamics. Investors seeking broad U.S. energy exposure frequently encounter two very different instruments: the First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) and the iShares U.S. Energy ETF (IYE). Although both sit in the same sector, they are not direct substitutes. FXN applies a rules-based, multi-factor stock-selection process, while IYE offers straightforward, cap-weighted access to the largest U.S. oil and gas companies. This ETF comparison clarifies their structural differences, sector exposure, cost profiles, and relative positioning.

First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) Overview

FXN seeks to track the StrataQuant Energy Index, which applies First Trust's proprietary AlphaDEX methodology to U.S. energy stocks drawn from the Russell 1000 universe. The model ranks holdings on growth factors (price appreciation, sales-to-price, sales growth) and value factors (book-to-price, cash-flow-to-price, return on assets), selecting the highest-scoring names. The fund is a modified equal-dollar-weighted, rules-based (passive) strategy rather than an active or leveraged product.

The portfolio typically holds roughly 40 stocks, with top names including First Solar (FSLR), Ovintiv (OVV), Permian Resources (PR), HF Sinclair (DINO), Devon Energy (DVN), Cheniere Energy (LNG), Expand Energy (EXE), Matador Resources (MTDR), APA Corporation (APA), and Phillips 66 (PSX). Its expense ratio is 0.63%, and the index is reconstituted and rebalanced quarterly. Because holdings are spread across quintiles, single-stock concentration is lower than in cap-weighted peers.

iShares U.S. Energy ETF (IYE) Overview

IYE is a passively managed fund from BlackRock's iShares family that seeks to track a market-capitalization-weighted index of U.S. oil and gas companies — historically the Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index. It launched in June 2000, making it one of the most established energy ETFs available. Unlike FXN's factor-driven construction, IYE simply mirrors the size of its constituents, so larger companies dominate.

The fund holds roughly 40–44 securities, led by Exxon Mobil (XOM) at about 23%, Chevron (CVX) near 16%, followed by ConocoPhillips (COP), Marathon Petroleum (MPC), Valero Energy (VLO), Phillips 66 (PSX), Williams Companies (WMB), EOG Resources (EOG), SLB (SLB), and Kinder Morgan (KMI). Its top 10 holdings represent roughly 70% of assets, and its net expense ratio is approximately 0.37%–0.38% — significantly lower than FXN.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both funds operate within the U.S. energy complex, which remains sensitive to crude oil and natural gas prices, OPEC+ production decisions, geopolitical supply disruptions, and global demand growth. In recent market cycles, disciplined capital allocation and shareholder returns — dividends and buybacks — have supported integrated and exploration-and-production companies alike. Refining margins, liquefied natural gas (LNG) export demand, and midstream cash flows add further nuance. Regulatory developments around permitting and energy transition policies continue to shape long-term sentiment. Key risks include commodity price volatility, demand cyclicality, and valuation compression during economic slowdowns.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both ETFs have generally moved in tandem with the energy sector's broad direction, but their composition creates meaningful performance divergence. IYE's heavy weighting toward Exxon Mobil and Chevron makes it a relatively lower-turnover, dividend-oriented vehicle whose results closely track integrated megacaps. FXN's equal-weighted, factor-tilted approach exposes it more to mid-cap producers and refiners, which can outperform during periods of rising crude prices or widening refining margins but may lag when large-cap defensive names lead. As a result, FXN has historically exhibited different volatility and drawdown characteristics than IYE, with single-stock risk more dispersed but sensitivity to smaller, higher-beta names more pronounced. Investors evaluating relative positioning should weigh IYE's cost and liquidity advantages against FXN's broader factor diversification.

AI Screener

Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market using technical patterns, fundamentals, trend signals, volatility, and AI-driven ratings. Users can scan thousands of equities and funds with customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener is designed to surface trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and emerging opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your sector research with data-driven insights.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, trend consistency, and risk exposure, Tickeron's AI would likely favor IYE in the current environment. Its materially lower expense ratio, deep liquidity, and exposure to financially resilient integrated oil majors offer a steadier, lower-cost core energy allocation. FXN, by contrast, offers more balanced holdings and factor diversification, which can be advantageous in sharply trending, mid-cap-led rallies, but its higher cost and smaller-cap tilt introduce greater relative volatility. The AI's preference would tilt toward IYE for cost- and stability-focused investors, while acknowledging FXN's appeal for those seeking a more equally weighted, factor-driven energy tilt. This is a probabilistic assessment, not investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations