Advertisement
GFI vs IAG
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Gold Fields Limited (GFI) vs. IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- GFI has shown greater stability in recent market activity, trading around $42 amid gold price strength, while IAG has faced sharper declines to near $16.60.
- Both stocks benefit from elevated gold prices, but GFI's diversified operations across multiple continents provide broader exposure compared to IAG's focus on North America and West Africa.
- GFI delivered strong 12-month returns exceeding 95%, outperforming IAG's more volatile trajectory.
- Recent earnings from GFI highlighted robust production, while IAG approaches Q1 2026 results with downward momentum.
- Sector tailwinds favor gold miners, positioning GFI ahead on relative performance metrics.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines GFI and IAG, two gold mining companies navigating a favorable gold market environment. Investors seeking exposure to precious metals amid inflation concerns and geopolitical tensions may find value in evaluating their operational scale, geographic diversification, and price momentum. Traders focused on sector relative performance will appreciate insights into recent sentiment shifts driven by production updates and commodity trends. By contrasting business models and market positioning, this analysis aids informed decision-making in the volatile mining sector.
GFI Overview and Recent Performance
Gold Fields Limited (GFI) is a globally diversified gold producer with operations in South Africa, Ghana, Australia, Peru, Canada, and Chile. The company focuses on low-cost production and reserve expansion. In recent market activity, GFI shares have traded around $42, reflecting resilience following Q4 2025 results announced in February 2026, which showed attributable profit growth and steady output. Sentiment has been supported by rising gold prices, though shares dipped post ex-dividend in March. Broader strength over the past year, with returns near 95%, underscores operational efficiency amid favorable commodity dynamics.
IAG Overview and Recent Performance
IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) operates as a mid-tier gold producer and developer, primarily in Canada and Burkina Faso, with flagship assets like the Côté Gold project. Recent weeks have seen IAG shares decline to around $16.60, down over 13% in the past month, amid sector rotation and anticipation of Q1 2026 results due May 5. Preliminary 2025 operating results in January highlighted progress, but price pressure reflects higher volatility compared to peers. Gold price support has provided some uplift, yet execution risks in development projects have tempered sentiment.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots selected from 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These curated bots feature annualized returns ranging from +23.53% to +163.10%, win rates of 51.30% to 88.33%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Examples include gold miners-focused bots with +54% to +61% returns and 56-58% win rates over 60-minute intervals using multi-agent AI/ML approaches. Other styles cover swing trading, trend following, and high-frequency signals with robust risk management. Explore these bots to align automated strategies with current gold sector opportunities.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GFI and IAG both capitalize on gold's rally, but differ in scale and diversification. GFI's multi-continent portfolio reduces jurisdictional risk, contrasting IAG's concentration in fewer regions with development upside. Recent momentum favors GFI's steadier trading range versus IAG's declines. Risk factors include IAG's project execution challenges and GFI's exposure to South African operations. Market sentiment leans toward GFI for proven production, while IAG offers growth potential trade-offs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently favor GFI over IAG, citing superior trend consistency, geographic diversification, and relative stability in recent gold market positioning. While both benefit from commodity tailwinds, GFI's operational scale and lower volatility suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFI is a Hold and IAG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GFI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIAG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GFI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IAG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GFI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IAG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GFI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- IAG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GFI (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.96% price change this week, while IAG (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -13.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -25.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
GFI is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2026.
IAG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-13.91% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| GFI | IAG | GFI / IAG | |
| Capitalization | 32B | 8.92B | 359% |
| EBITDA | 6.34B | 1.96B | 323% |
| Gain YTD | -16.345 | -6.367 | 257% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.01 | 9.03 | 100% |
| Revenue | 8.75B | 3.41B | 257% |
| Total Cash | 1.78B | 551M | 323% |
| Total Debt | 3.22B | 651M | 495% |
GFI | IAG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 33 | 34 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GFI's Valuation (5) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IAG (57). This means that GFI’s stock grew somewhat faster than IAG’s over the last 12 months.
IAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GFI (45). This means that IAG’s stock grew similarly to GFI’s over the last 12 months.
IAG's SMR Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GFI (100). This means that IAG’s stock grew similarly to GFI’s over the last 12 months.
IAG's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GFI (63). This means that IAG’s stock grew similarly to GFI’s over the last 12 months.
IAG's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for GFI (94). This means that IAG’s stock grew significantly faster than GFI’s over the last 12 months.
| GFI | IAG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 27 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 70% |
Advertisement