GFL
Price
$48.22
Change
+$0.19 (+0.40%)
Updated
Jul 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.81B
4 days until earnings call
MEG
Price
$23.43
Change
+$0.31 (+1.34%)
Updated
Jul 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.19B
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFL vs MEG

Header iconGFL vs MEG Comparison
Open Charts GFL vs MEGBanner chart's image
GFL Environmental
Price$48.22
Change+$0.19 (+0.40%)
Volume$4.68K
Capitalization12.81B
Montrose Environmental Group
Price$23.43
Change+$0.31 (+1.34%)
Volume$3.35K
Capitalization1.19B
GFL vs MEG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFL vs. MEG commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFL is a StrongBuy and MEG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GFL: $48.03 vs. MEG: $23.12)
Brand notoriety: GFL and MEG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFL: 67% vs. MEG: 86%
Market capitalization -- GFL: $12.81B vs. MEG: $1.19B
GFL [@Environmental Services] is valued at $12.81B. MEG’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMEG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MEG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFL is a better buy in the long-term than MEG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MEG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MEG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFL is a better buy in the short-term than MEG.

Price Growth

GFL (@Environmental Services) experienced а +1.09% price change this week, while MEG (@Environmental Services) price change was +5.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +6.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

MEG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+6.01% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFL($12.8B) has a higher market cap than MEG($1.2B). MEG YTD gains are higher at: 26.361 vs. GFL (8.366). GFL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.22B vs. MEG (31.9M). GFL has more cash in the bank: 136M vs. MEG (23.2M). MEG has less debt than GFL: MEG (210M) vs GFL (9.29B). GFL has higher revenues than MEG: GFL (7.52B) vs MEG (624M).
GFLMEGGFL / MEG
Capitalization12.8B1.2B1,071%
EBITDA2.22B31.9M6,944%
Gain YTD8.36626.36132%
P/E Ratio359.45N/A-
Revenue7.52B624M1,204%
Total Cash136M23.2M586%
Total Debt9.29B210M4,423%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MEG: Fundamental Ratings
MEG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFLMEG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGIHX15.95N/A
N/A
Nuveen Core Equity I
HOOYX30.20N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps Y
NQCAX5.43N/A
N/A
Nuveen Large Cap Value Opportunities A
CLSPX31.22N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd I
AUIAX35.37N/A
N/A
AB Equity Income A

GFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFL
1D Price
Change %
GFL100%
+0.40%
WCN - GFL
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
CWST - GFL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
RSG - GFL
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
WM - GFL
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
CLH - GFL
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
More

MEG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MEG and NVRI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MEG and NVRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEG
1D Price
Change %
MEG100%
+1.38%
NVRI - MEG
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLH - MEG
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
LNZA - MEG
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
QRHC - MEG
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
GFL - MEG
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
More