GFS
Price
$75.53
Change
-$9.17 (-10.83%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
41.42B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QCOM
Price
$215.94
Change
-$26.63 (-10.98%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
227.6B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFS vs QCOM

Header iconGFS vs QCOM Comparison
Open Charts GFS vs QCOMBanner chart's image
GFS vs QCOM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFS vs. QCOM commentary
Jun 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFS is a Hold and QCOM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2026
Stock price -- (GFS: $75.53 vs. QCOM: $215.94)
Brand notoriety: GFS: Not notable vs. QCOM: Notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFS: 134% vs. QCOM: 111%
Market capitalization -- GFS: $41.42B vs. QCOM: $227.6B
GFS [@Semiconductors] is valued at $41.42B. QCOM’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $227.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.97T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $187.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQCOM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QCOM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, QCOM is a better buy in the long-term than GFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QCOM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • QCOM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QCOM is a better buy in the short-term than GFS.

Price Growth

GFS (@Semiconductors) experienced а -5.55% price change this week, while QCOM (@Semiconductors) price change was -13.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -7.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +77.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

QCOM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-7.85% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QCOM($228B) has a higher market cap than GFS($41.4B). GFS has higher P/E ratio than QCOM: GFS (51.10) vs QCOM (23.22). GFS YTD gains are higher at: 116.294 vs. QCOM (27.524). QCOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14B vs. GFS (2.26B). QCOM has more cash in the bank: 9.8B vs. GFS (3.07B). GFS has less debt than QCOM: GFS (1.72B) vs QCOM (15.3B). QCOM has higher revenues than GFS: QCOM (44.5B) vs GFS (6.84B).
GFSQCOMGFS / QCOM
Capitalization41.4B228B18%
EBITDA2.26B14B16%
Gain YTD116.29427.524423%
P/E Ratio51.1023.22220%
Revenue6.84B44.5B15%
Total Cash3.07B9.8B31%
Total Debt1.72B15.3B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QCOM: Fundamental Ratings
QCOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
44
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
26
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFSQCOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QCOM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POOL185.522.30
+1.26%
Pool Corp
NFLX82.180.62
+0.76%
Netflix Inc.
LOKV10.55-0.03
-0.28%
Live Oak Acquisition Corp. V
ONMD0.68-0.05
-7.32%
OneMedNet Corp
HLIT13.27-1.34
-9.17%
Harmonic

GFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFS
1D Price
Change %
GFS100%
-10.83%
KLIC - GFS
72%
Closely correlated
-8.71%
FORM - GFS
69%
Closely correlated
-7.82%
ENTG - GFS
67%
Closely correlated
-10.34%
LRCX - GFS
66%
Loosely correlated
-9.85%
VECO - GFS
65%
Loosely correlated
-8.18%
More