This stock comparison examines Graco Inc. (GGG) and RBC Bearings Inc. (RBC), two NYSE-listed industrials firms with distinct niches in equipment manufacturing. GGG focuses on fluid management systems, while RBC produces precision bearings for aerospace and industrial uses. Traders seeking sector exposure and investors evaluating relative performance in volatile markets may find value here, particularly amid differing momentum in recent weeks. Key metrics like growth, margins, and valuation highlight trade-offs in this GGG vs. RBC stock comparison.
Graco Inc. (GGG) designs and markets fluid handling systems and components, including pumps and spray equipment for industrial, contractor, and process applications across sectors like coatings and adhesives. With a market cap of $12.88 billion, it maintains strong profitability (22.96% net margin, 19.78% ROE (return on equity)) and low leverage (debt/equity at 1.93%).
Recent market activity has pressured shares, trading around $78 within a 52-week range of $77-96. Performance shows YTD declines of 5% and 12% over the past month, influenced by a Q1 revenue miss ($540M vs. expected $562M, +2% YoY) and EPS of $0.66 (below estimates), amid softer organic sales. Sentiment reflects caution on near-term growth, though management retains low single-digit organic outlook and analysts hold targets near $93-100. Beta of 0.96 signals lower volatility.
RBC Bearings Inc. (RBC) manufactures engineered precision bearings, components, and systems for aerospace/defense and industrial markets, serving applications in aircraft, energy, and semiconductors. Market cap stands at $19.16 billion, with segments driving growth via backlogs.
Shares hover near $606 in a 52-week range of $351-632, reflecting robust momentum: +35% YTD, +66% over one year, +10% in three months, buoyed by Q3 revenue up 17% YoY and EPS growth of 16%. Recent weeks show stability with 2% five-day gains, fueled by aerospace demand and backlog expansion to $2.1 billion. Higher beta (1.47) indicates volatility, but analysts note margin gains; PE (trailing) at 71 reflects premium growth positioning. Upcoming earnings on May 15 add focus.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from over 351 available, selected by AI algorithms for suitability in current market volatility across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots deliver real-time signals for copy trading, showcasing annualized returns from +23% to +285%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Diverse styles include trend-following, momentum, and volatility plays on timeframes like 5min to 60min, trading sets such as semiconductors (NVDA, AVGO), industrials, space stocks, and leveraged ETFs. Virtual and brokerage agents incorporate risk management like TP/SL (take-profit/stop-loss) corridors. Explore these high performers to enhance strategies in dynamic conditions.
GGG and RBC share industrials exposure but contrast in models: GGG’s fluid systems yield higher margins (23% vs. 15%) and ROE (20% vs. 9%), with dividends (1.45% yield) suiting income focus; RBC leverages aerospace catalysts for faster growth (17% revenue vs. 2%).
Momentum favors RBC (+35% YTD vs. -5%), though GGG’s stability shines via lower beta (0.96 vs. 1.47) and debt. Valuations show RBC’s premium PE (71 vs. 25), tied to backlog; risks include cyclical aerospace for RBC and organic sales softness for GGG. Sentiment tilts growth-oriented for RBC, defensive for GGG in this stock comparison.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors RBC for its trend consistency, superior relative performance (+35% YTD vs. GGG’s -5%), and growth catalysts like aerospace backlog expansion. While GGG offers margin stability, RBC’s momentum and positioning suggest higher probability of outperformance in prevailing conditions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GGG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GGG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
GGG (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -2.77% price change this week, while RBC (@Tools & Hardware) price change was +1.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.16%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.80%.
GGG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
RBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Tools & Hardware (+0.20% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
| GGG | RBC | GGG / RBC | |
| Capitalization | 12.3B | 20B | 62% |
| EBITDA | 744M | 548M | 136% |
| Gain YTD | -8.915 | 41.257 | -22% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.68 | 71.04 | 35% |
| Revenue | 2.25B | 1.87B | 120% |
| Total Cash | 712M | 57.3M | 1,243% |
| Total Debt | 52.9M | 991M | 5% |
GGG | RBC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GGG's Valuation (25) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBC (85) in the null industry. This means that GGG’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBC’s over the last 12 months.
RBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGG (87) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew significantly faster than GGG’s over the last 12 months.
GGG's SMR Rating (46) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as RBC (75) in the null industry. This means that GGG’s stock grew similarly to RBC’s over the last 12 months.
RBC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GGG (70) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew similarly to GGG’s over the last 12 months.
RBC's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGG (70) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGG’s over the last 12 months.
| GGG | RBC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 24 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 67% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGG has been closely correlated with LECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGG jumps, then LECO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GGG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGG | 100% | -1.79% | ||
| LECO - GGG | 74% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| ITW - GGG | 73% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| AOS - GGG | 72% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| NDSN - GGG | 72% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| ROP - GGG | 72% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBC has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RBC jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.