Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where GS declined for three days, in 157 of 282 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 56%.
The Aroon Indicator for GS entered a downward trend on October 16, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where GS's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 20 of 22 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 41 of 54 cases where GS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for GS just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where GS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 34 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
GS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 4 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 20 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 87, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. GS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 88 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.339) is normal, around the industry mean (3.472). P/E Ratio (13.430) is within average values for comparable stocks, (9.162). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.133) is also within normal values, averaging (0.809). Dividend Yield (0.023) settles around the average of (6.992) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.394) is also within normal values, averaging (16.763).
LRGF saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 15, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 52 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 39 of the 52 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 75%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 45 of 64 cases where LRGF's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 16, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on LRGF as a result. In 58 of 80 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.
LRGF moved below its 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LRGF declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
LRGF broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Following a +1.41% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LRGF advanced for three days, in 280 of 347 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 304 of 375 cases where LRGF Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 81%.
GS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GS | LRGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 81% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while .
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.57% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -7.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.74%.
GS is expected to report earnings on Jan 19, 2027.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VDIG | 64.81 | 0.13 | +0.20% |
| Vanguard Wellington Dividend Growth Active ETF (VDIG) | |||
| KPRO | 26.51 | N/A | N/A |
| KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2027 ETF (KPRO) | |||
| IDYN | 29.82 | -0.10 | -0.35% |
| iShares International Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (IDYN) | |||
| DJUN | 50.14 | -0.25 | -0.50% |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) | |||
| ETHE | 19.34 | -0.30 | -1.53% |
| Grayscale Ethereum Staking ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRGF has been closely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRGF jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRGF | 100% | -1.28% | ||
| SEIC - LRGF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| TER - LRGF | 67% Closely correlated | -5.31% | ||
| GS - LRGF | 67% Closely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| TROW - LRGF | 66% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| UHAL - LRGF | 66% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
More | ||||