Advertisement
GS vs NDAQ
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both GS and NDAQ delivered strong Q1 2026 earnings beats, with robust revenue growth.
- GS reported record equities trading and EPS (earnings per share) of $17.55, driving 19% profit growth.
- NDAQ achieved 14% net revenue growth across all divisions, fueled by financial technology and data services.
- Year-to-date returns are similar at around 6% for both, but GS shows superior one-year momentum with 73% gains versus NDAQ's 23%.
- GS trades at a lower P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of 17 compared to NDAQ's 27.5.
- Tickeron's AI analysis favors GS for its trend consistency and relative strength in recent market activity.
Introduction
GS, a global investment banking powerhouse, and NDAQ, a technology-driven stock exchange operator, represent distinct yet complementary players in capital markets. This stock comparison highlights their recent performance amid volatile conditions, focusing on earnings momentum, valuation, and sector dynamics. Traders seeking exposure to banking and trading versus exchange infrastructure, or investors building diversified financial services portfolios, will find value in evaluating their relative positioning, growth drivers, and risk profiles in the current environment.
GS Overview and Recent Performance
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) is a leading investment bank offering services in global banking, markets, asset management, and platform solutions. In recent quarters, GS has benefited from heightened dealmaking and equities trading activity. Its Q1 2026 results showcased net revenues of $17.23 billion and EPS of $17.55, surpassing estimates, with record equities performance offsetting softer fixed income. The stock, trading around $927 with a market cap exceeding $275 billion, has climbed near 52-week highs amid broader market volatility. Positive sentiment stems from strong return on equity (ROE) of nearly 20% annualized and resilient performance in banking fees, though exposure to economic cycles influences short-term price behavior.
NDAQ Overview and Recent Performance
Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) provides technology solutions for capital markets, including data, indices, financial technology, and exchange services. Recent market activity has supported steady growth, highlighted by Q1 2026 net revenues of $1.41 billion, up 14% year-over-year, and adjusted EPS of $0.96, beating expectations across all segments. Trading near $91 with a $52 billion market cap, the stock reflects gains from fintech innovations, AI integrations, and upcoming 23/5 trading expansions. Investor sentiment has improved on recurring revenue from data and anti-fraud tools, dividend increases, and strategic partnerships, providing stability despite market fluctuations.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from hundreds of AI Trading Bots—over 350 in total—that trade thousands of different tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies, from swing trading to long-term patterns, with varying timeframes and risk profiles, adapting to current market conditions like volatility and sector rotations. Only the most suitable, promising bots earn a spot in this dynamic section, selected by AI for real-time relevance and strong simulated performance. Traders can explore bots tailored to financial services or broader indices, potentially including signals for tickers like GS and NDAQ. Visit the Trending AI Robots page to discover options that align with your trading style.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GS and NDAQ operate in financial services but diverge in models: GS focuses on transactional banking, underwriting (M&A - mergers and acquisitions), and trading, while NDAQ emphasizes recurring platform fees from data, clearing, and fintech. Growth drivers contrast with GS's cyclical boosts from equities and lending versus NDAQ's stable expansion in cloud/AI solutions. Recent momentum favors GS with tripled one-year returns, though both show similar YTD gains. Risk profiles differ: GS faces higher volatility from market swings, while NDAQ benefits from defensive data revenue. Market sentiment remains positive for both post-earnings, but GS's lower P/E suggests better value in capital markets exposure.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors GS over NDAQ, based on superior earnings momentum, higher ROE, stronger one-year trend consistency, and more attractive valuation amid recent capital markets strength. While NDAQ offers tech stability, GS's catalysts position it probabilistically better for near-term outperformance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a StrongBuy and NDAQ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- NDAQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NDAQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.81% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -9.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.37%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -6.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
GS is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.13% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (-6.05% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| GS | NDAQ | GS / NDAQ | |
| Capitalization | 326B | 46.7B | 698% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 3.32B | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.087 | -14.374 | -188% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.21 | 24.88 | 81% |
| Revenue | 60.4B | 8.3B | 727% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 435B | 9.45B | 4,606% |
GS | NDAQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NDAQ's Valuation (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (84). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (34). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
GS's SMR Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (53). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Price Growth Rating (9) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (62). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
GS's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (85). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
| GS | NDAQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 61% | 9 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 55% | 6 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 55% |
Advertisement
NDAQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ | 100% | +0.45% | ||
| JEF - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| MS - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| GS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| RJF - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| MCO - NDAQ | 68% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
More | ||||