Advertisement
GS vs NDAQ
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- GS delivered record Q2 2026 revenues of $20.3 billion and EPS of $20.98, with a return on equity of 23.5%, outpacing broader market gains in recent periods.
- NDAQ reported 15% revenue growth to $1.5 billion in Q2 2026, driven by solutions and recurring revenue streams, while crossing $1 trillion in index assets under management.
- GS stock has shown stronger year-to-date and one-year returns compared to NDAQ, which has faced relative underperformance amid market volatility.
- GS benefits from investment banking momentum, including AI-related M&A advisory, while NDAQ leverages its exchange and technology platforms for recurring income stability.
- Both companies operate in financial services but differ in exposure: GS to cyclical capital markets and NDAQ to market infrastructure and fintech innovation.
- Recent market activity highlights contrasting sentiment, with GS maintaining analyst interest in growth catalysts and NDAQ emphasizing operational resilience.
Introduction
Investors and traders often compare GS and NDAQ to assess opportunities in financial services, particularly those seeking exposure to capital markets activity versus market infrastructure and technology platforms. Goldman Sachs, a leading global investment bank, appeals to those focused on advisory, trading, and wealth management cycles. Nasdaq, Inc., operates exchanges and provides technology solutions, attracting interest in recurring revenue and fintech trends. This comparison suits portfolio managers evaluating relative performance, sector positioning, and risk factors in the current environment.
GS Overview and Recent Performance
Goldman Sachs operates as a global investment banking and financial services firm, with core segments in global banking and markets, asset and wealth management, and consumer platforms. In recent market activity, the stock has reflected strength from robust investment banking fees and equities trading, supported by elevated M&A volumes in AI and infrastructure sectors. Record second-quarter results underscored operational momentum, with revenues reaching $20.3 billion and diluted EPS of $20.98. Sentiment has benefited from the firm's positioning in high-profile deals and dividend increases, though short-term price movements have shown some consolidation amid broader market dynamics. Year-to-date returns have remained positive, outpacing many peers in the capital markets space.
NDAQ Overview and Recent Performance
Nasdaq, Inc. manages global exchanges and delivers technology, data, and analytics solutions across capital access platforms and financial technology. Recent performance has highlighted steady expansion in annualized recurring revenue, which reached $3.3 billion, alongside growth in solutions revenue of 17%. The company facilitated landmark listings and advanced initiatives in tokenized assets and AI-enhanced tools through acquisitions. Stock price action in recent weeks has been more subdued, with the shares trading below year-ago levels despite operational gains. Index assets under management surpassed $1 trillion, providing a stable growth driver, while overall returns have lagged broader financial indices amid valuation considerations.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates top-performing AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that execute strategies across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions, consistent backtested metrics, and adaptive performance earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse styles, strategies, timeframes, and ticker sets, with performance statistics ranging from varying win rates and risk-adjusted returns to different holding periods. This resource allows users to explore data-driven options aligned with individual objectives. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed analytics and live signals.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GS and NDAQ present distinct business models: the former centers on cyclical advisory and trading revenues tied to deal flow and market volatility, while the latter emphasizes stable, subscription-like income from exchange operations, data services, and technology licensing. Growth drivers differ accordingly, with GS positioned for M&A and capital markets rebounds and NDAQ benefiting from index product innovation and fintech adoption. Recent momentum favors GS in earnings delivery and relative returns, whereas NDAQ offers lower beta exposure and recurring revenue visibility. Risk factors include interest-rate sensitivity and regulatory scrutiny for both, though sector exposure places GS more directly in investment banking cycles and NDAQ in market infrastructure resilience. Market sentiment reflects these contrasts, with analysts noting GS’s deal pipeline potential alongside NDAQ’s execution in platform expansion.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as earnings consistency, trend stability, and catalyst positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to GS over NDAQ. Stronger relative performance metrics and investment banking momentum provide a more favorable setup, though outcomes remain subject to evolving macroeconomic conditions and sector-specific developments.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a StrongBuy and NDAQ is a StrongBuy.
GS | NDAQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 4 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GS's Valuation (71) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (83). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (37). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
GS's SMR Rating (4) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (52). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (58). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (64). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.
| GS | NDAQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 62% | 12 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 43% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while NDAQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NDAQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NDAQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.88% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -3.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.79%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -2.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
GS is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.59% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (-2.83% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
Advertisement
GS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
NDAQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| JEF - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| MS - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| GS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| RJF - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| SF - NDAQ | 66% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
More | ||||