Advertisement
GS vs NDAQ
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- GS has delivered stronger year-to-date and one-year returns compared to NDAQ, with YTD performance of approximately 17.75% versus 12.53% for NDAQ as of early July 2026.
- GS benefits from robust investment banking activity, including M&A (mergers and acquisitions) advisory and equity offerings, supporting recent momentum in a broadening market environment.
- NDAQ reported record first-half 2026 listing activity with $129.3 billion raised, highlighting its core exchange and data business resilience despite more modest stock returns.
- Both stocks trade in financials-related sectors, but GS exhibits higher sensitivity to capital markets volatility while NDAQ offers exposure to market infrastructure and index products.
- Analyst sentiment remains constructive for GS with multiple price target upgrades, while NDAQ has seen rating improvements tied to earnings estimate revisions.
- Upcoming earnings reports—GS on July 14 and NDAQ on July 23—represent near-term catalysts for both companies.
Introduction
Investors and traders often compare GS and NDAQ to assess opportunities across capital markets participants and market infrastructure providers. GS represents a leading global investment bank with diversified revenue from trading, asset management, and advisory services. NDAQ operates as a major exchange operator and provider of market data, technology, and index products. This comparison appeals to those seeking exposure to financial sector dynamics, relative performance in varying market conditions, and differentiation between cyclical revenue streams and more recurring infrastructure fees.
GS Overview and Recent Performance
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) is a global investment bank and financial services firm offering investment banking, market making, asset and wealth management, and consumer banking. In recent market activity, GS shares have shown resilience, closing near $1,030 in early July 2026 after trading within a 52-week range of $691.30 to $1,125.00. Year-to-date returns reached approximately 17.75%, outpacing the S&P 500's 9.31%, while one-year returns stood at nearly 50%. Performance has been supported by strong M&A (mergers and acquisitions) advisory, equity and debt issuance, and asset management results, alongside broader market gains in the first half of 2026. Sentiment has remained positive amid analyst upgrades and expectations for continued capital markets activity.
NDAQ Overview and Recent Performance
Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) operates global exchanges, provides market data, technology solutions, and index products. In recent market activity, NDAQ shares closed at $84.39 in early July 2026, within a 52-week range of $76.55 to $101.79. Year-to-date returns reached approximately 12.53%, modestly ahead of the S&P 500, though one-year returns lagged at 3.54%. The company highlighted record first-half 2026 U.S. exchange activity, with $129.3 billion raised through new listings. Recent performance reflects steady demand for exchange services and data products, tempered by broader equity market fluctuations. Sentiment has been supported by rating upgrades linked to earnings estimate improvements ahead of the July 23 earnings release.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Out of 351 total bots, the platform highlights its best 25 trending robots based on current market conditions, diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics. These bots vary in risk management approaches, signal generation methods, and asset focus, allowing users to identify options suited to specific volatility levels or analysis types. The section provides an informational resource for traders exploring automated strategies. Visit Trending AI Robots to explore the curated selection.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GS operates a cyclical business model heavily tied to trading volumes, advisory fees, and asset management assets under management (AUM), offering higher growth potential in bullish capital markets but greater sensitivity to economic cycles. NDAQ derives more stable revenue from exchange trading fees, data subscriptions, and technology licensing, providing defensive characteristics with lower volatility. Recent momentum favors GS through superior returns and analyst target increases, while NDAQ demonstrates strength in listing activity. Risk factors for GS include regulatory scrutiny and market downturns; for NDAQ, competition in data services and slower organic growth. Sector exposure overlaps in financials, yet GS aligns more with investment banking cycles and NDAQ with market infrastructure resilience. Market sentiment appears more constructive toward GS amid broader equity gains.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, return differentials, and positioning relative to broader indices, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable near-term positioning to GS over NDAQ. Stronger recent performance metrics and capital markets catalysts provide a more consistent momentum profile, though both stocks face earnings-related event risk that could influence outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Hold and NDAQ is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- NDAQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NDAQ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.89% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +4.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -7.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.38%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
GS is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-7.53% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (+1.82% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| GS | NDAQ | GS / NDAQ | |
| Capitalization | 309B | 50.5B | 612% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 3.32B | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.142 | -7.533 | -267% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.10 | 26.87 | 71% |
| Revenue | 60.4B | 8.3B | 727% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 435B | 9.45B | 4,606% |
GS | NDAQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NDAQ's Valuation (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (83). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (34). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
GS's SMR Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (53). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Price Growth Rating (17) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (54). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
GS's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (85). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
| GS | NDAQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 54% | 19 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 45% |
Advertisement
NDAQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| JEF - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| MS - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| GS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| RJF - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| SF - NDAQ | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||