Advertisement
GS vs MCO
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Moody's (MCO) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- GS (Goldman Sachs) reported robust Q2 2026 earnings with significant beats on revenue and EPS, supporting recent outperformance relative to broader indices.
- MCO (Moody's) maintains a stable position in credit ratings and analytics, with performance tied to debt issuance trends and regulatory environments.
- Year-to-date through mid-July 2026, GS delivered approximately 22% total return, exceeding the S&P 500's roughly 9% gain amid capital markets recovery.
- Both companies operate in financial services but differ in exposure: GS emphasizes investment banking and trading, while MCO focuses on ratings and data services.
- Recent market activity shows GS stock near 52-week highs with volatility following earnings, contrasting MCO's typically lower-beta profile.
- Sector sentiment favors firms benefiting from M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity and trading volumes, areas where GS has shown recent strength.
Introduction
Investors and traders often compare GS (GS) and MCO (MCO) to assess relative value within financial services. GS represents a leading global investment bank with diversified revenue from trading, advisory, and asset management. MCO operates as a major credit ratings and financial analytics provider. This comparison appeals to those evaluating cyclical versus more defensive financial exposure, particularly amid fluctuating interest rates, capital markets activity, and economic data releases in the current environment.
GS Overview and Recent Performance
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. provides investment banking, institutional client services, and asset and wealth management. In recent weeks, the stock has traded near all-time highs, closing at $1,065.22 on July 17, 2026, following a 52-week peak above $1,153. Year-to-date returns reached approximately 22%, outpacing the S&P 500. Strong Q2 2026 results, including a 39% year-over-year revenue increase and substantial EPS (earnings per share) beats, reflected robust investment banking and trading revenues. Sentiment has been supported by broader capital markets recovery and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) momentum, though daily moves remain sensitive to macroeconomic headlines and trading volumes.
MCO Overview and Recent Performance
Moody's Corporation delivers credit ratings, research, and risk analytics to global markets. The business benefits from recurring revenue tied to debt issuance and regulatory compliance needs. In recent market activity, the stock has exhibited steadier behavior compared with more volatile financial names, with performance influenced by corporate bond volumes and economic outlooks. While specific recent percentage moves are less pronounced than peers in banking, MCO maintains consistent positioning in its niche, supported by demand for independent credit assessments amid evolving credit cycles and geopolitical factors.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the most suitable AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics, with documented annualized returns ranging from moderate single-digit figures in conservative approaches to over 50% in optimized simulations, alongside metrics such as Sharpe ratios and profit factors. Users can review detailed statistics, backtested results, and live signals. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page to identify options matching individual risk preferences and market views.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GS operates a capital-intensive, transaction-driven model heavily exposed to equity and fixed-income trading plus advisory fees, creating higher sensitivity to market volatility and deal flow. MCO follows a more subscription-oriented model centered on ratings and data subscriptions, offering greater revenue predictability but limited upside from trading surges. Recent momentum favors GS following its earnings beat, while MCO provides defensive characteristics through lower correlation to daily market swings. Risk factors for GS include regulatory scrutiny on trading activities and compensation costs; for MCO, they center on competition in analytics and potential shifts in rating methodologies. Sector exposure places both in financials, yet GS carries greater cyclicality tied to economic expansion and risk appetite.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, relative price stability near highs, and alignment with capital markets catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models currently indicate a probabilistic preference for GS over MCO in trend-following and momentum-oriented strategies. This assessment reflects stronger near-term visibility in revenue drivers without constituting a definitive ranking.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a StrongBuy and MCO is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.90% price change this week, while MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -0.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.16%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
GS is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.
MCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.96% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.22% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| GS | MCO | GS / MCO | |
| Capitalization | 309B | 83.8B | 369% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 4.36B | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.954 | -4.890 | -429% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.37 | 30.69 | 53% |
| Revenue | 60.4B | 8.16B | 740% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.5B | - |
| Total Debt | 435B | 7.52B | 5,783% |
GS | MCO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 28 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GS's Valuation (75) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (84) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCO (60) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.
GS's SMR Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (15) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Price Growth Rating (22) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (52) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
GS's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCO (83) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.
| GS | MCO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 55% | 6 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 48% |
Advertisement
MCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCO | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| SPGI - MCO | 88% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| MSCI - MCO | 70% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| JEF - MCO | 66% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| SF - MCO | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| GS - MCO | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.52% | ||
More | ||||