Advertisement
GS vs MCO
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Moody's (MCO) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Goldman Sachs (GS) operates as a leading global investment bank with diversified revenue from investment banking, trading, and asset management, while Moody's (MCO) focuses on credit ratings, analytics, and risk assessment services.
- In recent market activity, GS has shown stronger momentum supported by expected robust Q2 earnings growth and major asset management mandates, contrasting with MCO's more modest year-to-date returns.
- GS benefits from exposure to capital markets activity including M&A and IPOs, whereas MCO draws stability from recurring analytics subscriptions amid slower broader market participation.
- Relative performance indicates GS has outpaced the broader market in select periods, while MCO has trailed the S&P 500 on a year-to-date and one-year basis.
- Both companies face sector-specific risks: GS from market volatility and regulatory scrutiny, MCO from competition in data analytics and economic sensitivity in ratings demand.
- Upcoming earnings releases—GS on July 14, 2026, and MCO on July 22, 2026—provide near-term catalysts for reassessing relative positioning.
Introduction
Goldman Sachs (GS) and Moody's (MCO) represent distinct segments within the financial services industry, making them relevant for comparison among investors seeking exposure to capital markets activity versus data-driven analytics. Traders and portfolio managers evaluating relative performance, sector resilience, and growth drivers in the current environment may find this analysis useful. The comparison highlights observable differences in business models, recent stock behavior, and market positioning without implying directional outcomes.
GS Overview and Recent Performance
Goldman Sachs (GS) is a global investment banking, securities, and investment management firm that generates revenue across advisory, trading, and asset/wealth management activities. In recent weeks, the stock has exhibited upward movement aligned with expectations for strong second-quarter earnings, including projected year-over-year EPS growth of approximately 32.6%. Recent market activity has been supported by significant asset management mandates totaling around $70 billion and broader capital markets momentum, including M&A and IPO-related flows. Sentiment has benefited from the firm's positioning in equity and fixed-income trading amid elevated market volumes.
MCO Overview and Recent Performance
Moody's (MCO) provides credit ratings, research, and risk analytics primarily through its ratings and analytics segments, serving institutional clients with recurring data and assessment services. In recent market activity, the stock has posted more measured gains, with year-to-date returns around 4.23% compared to stronger broader equity benchmarks. Performance has been influenced by solid first-quarter results that beat estimates and prompted an upward revision to full-year guidance, driven by demand in analytics. Sentiment remains tied to economic conditions affecting ratings volume and competition within the information services space.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section that features select AI trading bots from a broader library of hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, including consistent trend following, risk-adjusted returns, and adaptability across varying timeframes, are highlighted in this section. Available bots encompass a wide range of trading styles, strategies, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with historical win rates and drawdown statistics varying by bot. Readers interested in exploring these automated approaches can review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Goldman Sachs (GS) and Moody's (MCO) differ fundamentally in business models: GS derives significant revenue from cyclical capital markets activities such as trading and advisory, exposing it to market volatility and M&A cycles, while MCO relies more on stable, subscription-based analytics and ratings that provide greater earnings predictability. Growth drivers favor GS in environments of heightened deal flow and trading volumes, whereas MCO benefits from secular demand for credit and risk data. Recent momentum has tilted toward GS amid earnings optimism and asset inflows, in contrast to MCO's relative underperformance versus the S&P 500. Risk factors include GS's sensitivity to regulatory and market swings versus MCO's exposure to economic slowdowns that could dampen ratings activity. Sector exposure positions GS within broader financials with direct market beta, while MCO offers defensive characteristics through information services. Overall market sentiment reflects these trade-offs, with GS showing greater responsiveness to capital markets catalysts in recent periods.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings momentum, asset inflow catalysts, and relative consistency in trend behavior, Tickeron's AI models would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to Goldman Sachs (GS) over Moody's (MCO) in the near term. This assessment draws from GS's stronger alignment with capital markets recovery signals and upcoming earnings visibility, while acknowledging MCO's more stable but slower-moving profile. The view remains probabilistic and subject to shifts with new data.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Hold and MCO is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MCO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.89% price change this week, while MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -0.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -7.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.38%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
GS is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
MCO is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-7.53% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (+1.72% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| GS | MCO | GS / MCO | |
| Capitalization | 309B | 86.6B | 357% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 3.96B | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.142 | -2.520 | -799% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.10 | 35.56 | 54% |
| Revenue | 60.4B | 7.87B | 767% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.51B | - |
| Total Debt | 435B | 7.31B | 5,948% |
GS | MCO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GS's Valuation (83) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (85) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCO (48) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.
GS's SMR Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (15) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Price Growth Rating (17) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (49) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
GS's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCO (71) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.
| GS | MCO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 51% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 62% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 22 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 50% |
Advertisement
GS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
MCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCO | 100% | +1.73% | ||
| SPGI - MCO | 88% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| MSCI - MCO | 67% Closely correlated | +2.57% | ||
| JEF - MCO | 66% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| SF - MCO | 66% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GS - MCO | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
More | ||||