Advertisement
GS vs MCO
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Moody's (MCO) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Goldman Sachs (GS) reported blockbuster Q1 2026 earnings with $17.23 billion in revenue and $17.55 EPS, fueling recent stock gains, while Moody's (MCO) shares have declined year-to-date amid awaiting its earnings.
- GS trades at a lower P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of about 17 versus MCO's 33, suggesting better relative valuation.
- GS year-to-date performance stands at +7.7%, contrasting MCO's -10.7%, with GS up 12% over the past month.
- Tickeron's trending AI bots show strong performance on GS with win rates up to 83% and returns of 44-52%, none featuring MCO.
- GS offers a higher dividend yield of 1.9% compared to MCO's 0.9%.
Introduction
Goldman Sachs (GS) and Moody's (MCO) represent distinct pillars of the financial services sector: investment banking and trading versus credit ratings and analytics. This stock comparison highlights their relative performance, valuation, and market positioning in recent market activity, aiding investors seeking diversification between cyclical trading powerhouses and stable data providers. Traders focused on momentum may eye GS's volatility-driven gains, while long-term holders might assess MCO's analytics growth. Understanding these dynamics supports informed decisions on stock comparison and portfolio allocation.
GS Overview and Recent Performance
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) is a leading global investment bank engaged in investment banking, securities, asset management, and consumer banking. In recent quarters, GS has benefited from robust equities trading and investment banking fees amid volatile markets. Its Q1 2026 results showcased net revenues of $17.23 billion, up 14% year-over-year, and EPS of $17.55, surpassing estimates, driven by record equities performance. The stock, trading around $942 with a market cap of $279 billion, has risen about 12% in the past month and 7.7% year-to-date, reflecting positive sentiment from strong ROTCE (return on tangible common equity) and trading momentum, though sensitive to macroeconomic shifts.
MCO Overview and Recent Performance
Moody's Corporation (MCO) operates in credit ratings, research, and analytics through Moody's Ratings and Moody's Analytics segments. It provides essential risk assessment tools for debt issuers and investors. Recent market activity has pressured MCO shares, down 10.7% year-to-date and trading near $456 with an $81 billion market cap, despite a modest 3% monthly gain. Q4 2025 results were solid with revenue growth, and Q1 2026 earnings are anticipated soon, potentially highlighting analytics expansion. Sentiment reflects broader concerns over issuance volumes, balanced by steady demand for ratings data.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from over 350 available, each scanning thousands of tickers for optimal signals in stocks, ETFs, and crypto under current market conditions. These bots exhibit annualized returns from +15% to +168%, win rates of 54-88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days and strategies spanning sectors like semiconductors, finance, and defense. For instance, bots targeting GS show 44-53% returns and 83% win rates. Diverse styles suit swing traders to scalpers. Explore these vetted options to align with your trading approach.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GS and MCO diverge in business models: GS's trading and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activities yield higher volatility but potent growth in bull markets, while MCO's ratings oligopoly offers steadier cash flows from recurring fees. Recent momentum favors GS with superior YTD and monthly gains versus MCO's pullback. Valuation trade-offs include GS's attractive P/E of 17 and 1.9% yield against MCO's premium 33 P/E reflecting growth expectations. Risk factors: GS exposes to market cycles and NII (net interest income) swings, MCO to regulatory scrutiny. Sector sentiment tilts toward GS post-earnings catalysts.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward GS based on consistent recent trends, earnings beats, lower valuation multiples, and strong bot performance metrics like high win rates on its signals. MCO shows stability but lags in momentum and relative positioning. This probabilistic edge favors GS for near-term outperformance in volatile conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Hold and MCO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- MCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MCO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +9.77% price change this week, while MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +1.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.08%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.16%.
Reported Earning Dates
GS is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
MCO is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.38% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (-3.32% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| GS | MCO | GS / MCO | |
| Capitalization | 323B | 78.7B | 410% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 3.96B | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.256 | -10.287 | -255% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.03 | 32.33 | 62% |
| Revenue | 60.4B | 7.87B | 767% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.51B | - |
| Total Debt | 435B | 7.31B | 5,948% |
GS | MCO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 54 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GS's Valuation (85) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (86) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCO (54) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.
GS's SMR Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (15) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCO (54) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.
GS's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCO (72) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.
| GS | MCO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 42% |
Advertisement
GS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
MCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCO | 100% | -2.60% | ||
| SPGI - MCO | 88% Closely correlated | -3.52% | ||
| JEF - MCO | 66% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| MSCI - MCO | 66% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| SF - MCO | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| GS - MCO | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
More | ||||