Advertisement
HAS vs OSW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAS is a Hold and OSW is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HAS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOSW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- OSW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- OSW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HAS (@Recreational Products) experienced а -1.80% price change this week, while OSW (@Recreational Products) price change was -11.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.95%.
Reported Earning Dates
HAS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
OSW is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Recreational Products (-2.59% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| HAS | OSW | HAS / OSW | |
| Capitalization | 13.1B | 2.27B | 576% |
| EBITDA | 1.36B | 117M | 1,158% |
| Gain YTD | 15.409 | 8.701 | 177% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.46 | 28.35 | 58% |
| Revenue | 4.97B | 1.01B | 492% |
| Total Cash | 1.38B | 40.4M | 3,411% |
| Total Debt | 3.57B | 90.9M | 3,926% |
HAS | OSW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 43 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OSW's Valuation (16) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (63) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.
OSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (82) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.
HAS's SMR Rating (11) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSW (58) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that HAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSW’s over the last 12 months.
HAS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as OSW (62) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to OSW’s over the last 12 months.
HAS's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as OSW (60) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to OSW’s over the last 12 months.
| HAS | OSW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FAZ | 31.10 | 0.70 | +2.30% |
| Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X ETF | |||
| VFMO | 229.80 | 2.11 | +0.93% |
| Vanguard US Momentum Factor ETF | |||
| NEWZ | 30.18 | N/A | N/A |
| EA Series Trust StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF | |||
| SGDJ | 100.49 | -2.51 | -2.44% |
| Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | |||
| MUD | 9.80 | -0.62 | -5.95% |
| Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares | |||
HAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HAS and FNKO have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAS and FNKO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAS | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| FNKO - HAS | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| JAKK - HAS | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.20% | ||
| LTH - HAS | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
| JOUT - HAS | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.89% | ||
| MAT - HAS | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.61% | ||
More | ||||
OSW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSW has been loosely correlated with JOUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OSW jumps, then JOUT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OSW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSW | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| JOUT - OSW | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| JAKK - OSW | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.20% | ||
| CALY - OSW | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| HAS - OSW | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| CLAR - OSW | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
More | ||||