Advertisement
HAS vs OSW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) vs. OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Revenue Growth: HAS shows modest top‑line growth driven by legacy toy brands, while OSW posted a double‑digit revenue increase from expanding cruise‑ship wellness locations.
- Profitability Gap: HAS remains loss‑making on a GAAP basis, whereas OSW reported positive net margins above 7% and improving cash conversion.
- Valuation Contrast: HAS trades at a high price‑to‑sales multiple (>2.5×) and a forward P/E near 18×, while OSW trades at a forward P/E around 32× but with a lower price‑to‑sales ratio (~2.4×).
- Sector Sensitivity: HAS is exposed to discretionary consumer spending cycles; OSW is more linked to travel‑leisure demand and cruise industry health.
- Market Sentiment: Recent analyst upgrades have nudged HAS upward, whereas OSW’s inclusion in the S&P SmallCap 600 boosted its institutional appeal.
Introduction
Investors seeking exposure to consumer‑focused businesses often compare the classic toy and game conglomerate Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) with the newer leisure‑services operator OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW). Both stocks sit in the broader consumer discretionary umbrella but differ sharply in product mix, growth drivers, and risk profiles. This comparison is relevant for traders who balance “old‑economy” brand resilience against “new‑economy” experiential demand, especially in a market where inflation pressures and travel sentiment are diverging.
HAS Overview and Recent Performance
Hasbro, Inc. is a global toy and game company headquartered in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. Its core portfolio includes iconic brands such as Monopoly, Transformers, Nerf, Play‑Doh, and the trading‑card powerhouse Wizards of the Coast (creator of Magic: The Gathering and Dungeons & Dragons). The company also licenses its IP to apparel, publishing and entertainment partners.
In recent weeks, HAS has traded within a narrow $2‑$3 range, edging higher after several analyst upgrades that lifted its price target toward $115. The stock’s beta of roughly 0.5 indicates lower volatility than the broader market. Earnings released in early May showed a modest 13% year‑over‑year sales increase to $4.7 billion, but GAAP net income remained negative (‑$322 million) due partly to higher licensing costs and restructuring charges. Operating margins improved to 22% on a non‑GAAP basis, while cash flow turned positive, giving the balance sheet a solid cash position of $1.4 billion.
Key sentiment drivers include: (1) the upcoming release of new “Transformers” and “My Little Pony” media tie‑ins, (2) a softening of U.S. inflation that eases discretionary spending concerns, and (3) a modestly higher dividend yield of 2.73% that appeals to income‑focused traders. Nonetheless, the company’s high leverage—total debt exceeding $5 billion—keeps risk premia elevated.
OSW Overview and Recent Performance
OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited operates health, wellness and beauty services on approximately 195 cruise ships and at 50 destination resorts worldwide. Its offering ranges from traditional spa treatments and fitness facilities to advanced therapies such as LED light therapy and NAD‑boosting IV infusions. The company also sells premium consumer‑goods brands—including ELEMIS, Kérastase and Dysport—exclusively within the cruise‑ship market.
During the last month, OSW rallied roughly 9% after reporting record first‑quarter fiscal 2026 results: revenue of $247.6 million (up 11% QoQ) and net income of $21.3 million, delivering a net margin of 7.9%. The earnings beat spurred a price target lift by TD Cowen to $29. The stock’s beta near 1.0 reflects sensitivity to travel‑industry news, and its forward P/E of 32× remains elevated relative to the leisure sector average of 17×.
Fundamental strengths include a debt‑to‑equity ratio of 0.26, ample cash (≈$16 million) and an operating cash flow conversion of $83 million, indicating strong liquidity. Recent catalysts are the partnership with Niagen Bioscience to bring IV therapy to cruise ships and the expansion of destination‑resort locations in the Caribbean. Conversely, OSW’s exposure to cruise‑line capacity utilization and potential regulatory changes in the wellness sector adds downside risk.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron offers a curated Trending AI Robots page that showcases the platform’s most effective algorithmic trading bots. Hundreds of bots—spanning momentum, mean‑reversion, volatility‑scaling and multi‑timeframe strategies—trade thousands of tickers across global exchanges. Only the top‑performing bots that meet rigorous back‑tested win‑rate, Sharpe ratio and drawdown criteria earn a spot in the trending section, providing traders with a ready‑made toolkit for the current market environment.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Aspect | HAS (Hasbro) | OSW (OneSpaWorld) |
|---|---|---|
| Business Model | Traditional toys, licensed IP, and digital games; revenue driven by brand cycles. | On‑board spa and wellness services; revenue linked to cruise passenger volumes and resort bookings. |
| Growth Drivers | New media tie‑ins, digital‑gaming expansion, licensing deals. | Expansion of ship venues, resort openings, premium health‑tech partnerships. |
| Recent Momentum | Modest price uptick after analyst upgrades; stable cash flow. | Strong Q1 earnings beat; price rally and upward target revisions. |
| Risk Factors | High debt, reliance on discretionary spend, brand‑fatigue risk. | Exposure to cruise‑industry capacity, regulatory health‑service risks, higher valuation multiples. |
| Sector Exposure | Consumer Discretionary – Toys & Games. | Leisure – Health & Wellness on cruise ships. |
| Market Sentiment | Neutral‑to‑positive from income‑oriented investors; dividend appeal. | Positive from growth‑oriented investors; inclusion in S&P SmallCap 600 adds index‑fund interest. |
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trends, Tickeron’s AI currently leans slightly toward OSW. The bot‑driven analysis assigns higher weight to consistent earnings growth, improving cash conversion and recent catalyst‑driven price appreciation. However, the elevated forward P/E and travel‑sector exposure keep the probability of downside within a measurable range. Conversely, HAS offers dividend yield and brand resilience but faces headwinds from negative GAAP earnings and high leverage, which temper the AI’s confidence.
Disclaimer
“The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.” Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAS is a Hold and OSW is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HAS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOSW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HAS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- OSW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- OSW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HAS (@Recreational Products) experienced а -0.33% price change this week, while OSW (@Recreational Products) price change was +7.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +6.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
HAS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
OSW is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Recreational Products (+6.28% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| HAS | OSW | HAS / OSW | |
| Capitalization | 11.9B | 2.62B | 455% |
| EBITDA | 329M | 114M | 289% |
| Gain YTD | 3.866 | 24.913 | 16% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.60 | 34.39 | 74% |
| Revenue | 4.81B | 989M | 487% |
| Total Cash | 1.36B | 16.1M | 8,416% |
| Total Debt | 3.62B | 92.6M | 3,913% |
HAS | OSW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 37 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OSW's Valuation (22) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (59) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.
OSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for HAS (91) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew significantly faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.
OSW's SMR Rating (61) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (97) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.
OSW's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as HAS (59) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew similarly to HAS’s over the last 12 months.
OSW's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as HAS (50) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that OSW’s stock grew similarly to HAS’s over the last 12 months.
| HAS | OSW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 58% | 5 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
HAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been loosely correlated with JOUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then JOUT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAS | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| JOUT - HAS | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| YETI - HAS | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| GOLF - HAS | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| AS - HAS | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| MAT - HAS | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
More | ||||
OSW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSW has been loosely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OSW jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OSW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSW | 100% | +3.95% | ||
| CUK - OSW | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AS - OSW | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| YETI - OSW | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| JOUT - OSW | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| HAS - OSW | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
More | ||||