39 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
HFGO vs MNST
HFGO vs MNST Comparison
Open Charts HFGO vs MNST
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
Price$24.06
Change+$0.28 (+1.18%)
Volume$5.73K
Net Assets127.52M
Monster Beverage
Price$49.42
Change-$0.23 (-0.46%)
Volume$11.8M
Capitalization62.08B
HFGO vs MNST Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFGO vs. MNST commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFGO is a Hold and MNST is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNST: Fundamental Ratings
MNST | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HFGO | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 71% | 11 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 87% | 11 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 87% | 24 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 75% | 12 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HFGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HFGO and OKTA have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFGO and OKTA's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HFGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFGO | 100% | +1.17% | ||
| OKTA - HFGO | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.89% | ||
| MNST - HFGO | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
| LW - HFGO | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.71% | ||
| FWONK - HFGO | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.33% | ||
| AVB - HFGO | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| KO - MNST | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.30% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.46% | ||
More | ||||