Advertisement
BGC vs MRX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGC is a StrongBuy and MRX is a Buy.
| BGC | MRX | BGC / MRX | |
| Capitalization | 5.78B | 5.25B | 110% |
| EBITDA | 512M | 1.47B | 35% |
| Gain YTD | 37.067 | 92.088 | 40% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.41 | 14.83 | 205% |
| Revenue | 3.23B | 4.4B | 73% |
| Total Cash | 767M | 8.45B | 9% |
| Total Debt | 1.77B | 11.5B | 15% |
BGC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BGC | MRX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 9 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 89% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BGC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MRX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BGC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MRX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BGC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BGC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MRX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BGC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MRX (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -6.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
BGC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
MRX is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.95% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XLF | 57.25 | 0.38 | +0.67% |
| State Street®FinSelSectSPDR®ETF | |||
| BUFH | 21.62 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | |||
| MBSF | 25.61 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF | |||
| MLPI | 53.99 | -0.16 | -0.30% |
| NEOS MLP & Engy Infras Hi Inc ETF | |||
| CONI | 31.16 | -1.02 | -3.18% |
| GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF | |||
BGC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGC has been loosely correlated with NDAQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGC jumps, then NDAQ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BGC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGC | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| NDAQ - BGC | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| RJF - BGC | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| MCO - BGC | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| MORN - BGC | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| SPGI - BGC | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||
MRX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRX has been loosely correlated with SNEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRX jumps, then SNEX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRX | 100% | -1.47% | ||
| SNEX - MRX | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| VIRT - MRX | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| BGC - MRX | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| SF - MRX | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| EVR - MRX | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
More | ||||