BGC
Price
$12.57
Change
+$0.49 (+4.06%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.02B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MRX
Price
$66.51
Change
+$1.21 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.78B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGC vs MRX

BGC vs MRX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGC vs. MRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGC is a Buy and MRX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (BGC: $12.07 vs. MRX: $65.26)
Brand notoriety: BGC and MRX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGC: 82% vs. MRX: 106%
Market capitalization -- BGC: $5.78B vs. MRX: $4.69B
BGC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $5.78B. MRX’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $4.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $14.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BGC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MRX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRX is a better buy in the long-term than BGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MRX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BGC and MRX are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BGC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.29% price change this week, while MRX (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

MRX is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.25% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGC($6.02B) has a higher market cap than MRX($4.78B). BGC has higher P/E ratio than MRX: BGC (32.65) vs MRX (14.81). MRX YTD gains are higher at: 71.345 vs. BGC (35.695). MRX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.33B vs. BGC (490M). MRX has more cash in the bank: 6.89B vs. BGC (781M). BGC has less debt than MRX: BGC (1.78B) vs MRX (10.4B). MRX has higher revenues than BGC: MRX (4.1B) vs BGC (3.18B).
BGCMRXBGC / MRX
Capitalization6.02B4.78B126%
EBITDA490M1.33B37%
Gain YTD35.69571.34550%
P/E Ratio32.6514.81220%
Revenue3.18B4.1B78%
Total Cash781M6.89B11%
Total Debt1.78B10.4B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGC: Fundamental Ratings
BGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGCMRX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MRX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PILL14.810.71
+5.04%
Direxion Daily Phrmctcl&MdclBl3XShrsETF
RFDI88.400.20
+0.23%
First Trust RiverFront Dyn Dev Intl ETF
PMSE26.20N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September
IWB406.95-1.46
-0.36%
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
IHAK54.06-0.45
-0.83%
iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF

BGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGC has been loosely correlated with NDAQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGC jumps, then NDAQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGC
1D Price
Change %
BGC100%
+0.17%
NDAQ - BGC
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
RJF - BGC
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
MCO - BGC
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
MORN - BGC
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
SPGI - BGC
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
More

MRX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRX has been loosely correlated with SNEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRX jumps, then SNEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRX
1D Price
Change %
MRX100%
+0.63%
SNEX - MRX
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
VIRT - MRX
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
SF - MRX
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
EVR - MRX
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
BGC - MRX
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
More