BGC
Price
$10.98
Change
+$0.20 (+1.86%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.26B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MRX
Price
$64.88
Change
-$0.90 (-1.37%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.67B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGC vs MRX

BGC vs MRX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGC vs. MRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGC is a StrongBuy and MRX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (BGC: $10.98 vs. MRX: $64.88)
Brand notoriety: BGC and MRX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGC: 51% vs. MRX: 36%
Market capitalization -- BGC: $5.26B vs. MRX: $4.67B
BGC [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $5.26B. MRX’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $4.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $14.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMRX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MRX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRX is a better buy in the long-term than BGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MRX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRX is a better buy in the short-term than BGC.

Price Growth

BGC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.08% price change this week, while MRX (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -2.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -7.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

MRX is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-7.53% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGC($5.26B) has a higher market cap than MRX($4.67B). BGC has higher P/E ratio than MRX: BGC (29.68) vs MRX (14.73). MRX YTD gains are higher at: 70.334 vs. BGC (23.441). MRX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.33B vs. BGC (490M). MRX has more cash in the bank: 6.89B vs. BGC (781M). BGC has less debt than MRX: BGC (1.78B) vs MRX (10.4B). MRX has higher revenues than BGC: MRX (4.1B) vs BGC (3.18B).
BGCMRXBGC / MRX
Capitalization5.26B4.67B113%
EBITDA490M1.33B37%
Gain YTD23.44170.33433%
P/E Ratio29.6814.73202%
Revenue3.18B4.1B78%
Total Cash781M6.89B11%
Total Debt1.78B10.4B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGC: Fundamental Ratings
BGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGCMRX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MRX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RVNU25.20N/A
N/A
Xtrackers Municipal Infras Rev Bd ETF
XBCI31.91N/A
N/A
NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF
FBND45.10-0.15
-0.33%
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
FXR88.25-0.69
-0.77%
First Trust Indtls/PrdcrDurbAlphaDEX®ETF
BPAY26.39-0.32
-1.19%
iShares FinTech Active ETF

BGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGC has been loosely correlated with NDAQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGC jumps, then NDAQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGC
1D Price
Change %
BGC100%
+1.86%
NDAQ - BGC
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
RJF - BGC
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
MCO - BGC
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
MORN - BGC
50%
Loosely correlated
+5.07%
SPGI - BGC
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
More

MRX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRX has been loosely correlated with SNEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRX jumps, then SNEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRX
1D Price
Change %
MRX100%
-1.38%
SNEX - MRX
55%
Loosely correlated
-4.54%
VIRT - MRX
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
BGC - MRX
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
EVR - MRX
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
SF - MRX
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More