MRX
Price
$66.51
Change
+$1.21 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.78B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SF
Price
$73.57
Change
-$0.24 (-0.33%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.28B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRX vs SF

MRX vs SF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRX vs. SF commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRX is a Buy and SF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (MRX: $65.26 vs. SF: $73.81)
Brand notoriety: MRX and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRX: 106% vs. SF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MRX: $4.69B vs. SF: $11.32B
MRX [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.69B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $11.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $14.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MRX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRX is a better buy in the long-term than SF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRX is a better buy in the short-term than SF.

Price Growth

MRX (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +4.42% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

MRX is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.

SF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.25% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($11.3B) has a higher market cap than MRX($4.78B). MRX (14.81) and SF (14.38) have similar P/E ratio . MRX YTD gains are higher at: 71.345 vs. SF (-10.880). SF has less debt than MRX: SF (1.52B) vs MRX (10.4B). SF has higher revenues than MRX: SF (5.69B) vs MRX (4.1B).
MRXSFMRX / SF
Capitalization4.78B11.3B42%
EBITDA1.33BN/A-
Gain YTD71.345-10.880-656%
P/E Ratio14.8114.38103%
Revenue4.1B5.69B72%
Total Cash6.89BN/A-
Total Debt10.4B1.52B683%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SF: Fundamental Ratings
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRXSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDVY42.350.13
+0.31%
First Trust SMID Cp Rising Div Achv ETF
RZG69.230.06
+0.08%
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Gr ETF
IBMQ25.550.02
+0.08%
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bd ETF
GRNI21.14-0.07
-0.33%
Fundstrat Granny Shots Us Large Cap & Income ETF
SKRE6.82-0.13
-1.81%
Tuttle Cptl Dl 2X Invrs Rgnl Banks ETF

MRX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRX has been loosely correlated with SNEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRX jumps, then SNEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRX
1D Price
Change %
MRX100%
+0.63%
SNEX - MRX
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
VIRT - MRX
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
SF - MRX
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
EVR - MRX
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
BGC - MRX
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
+0.37%
RJF - SF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
PIPR - SF
73%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
EVR - SF
70%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
MC - SF
69%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
NDAQ - SF
69%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
More