HIFS
Price
$289.57
Change
-$1.17 (-0.40%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
636.13M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ONB
Price
$26.32
Change
+$0.12 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
10.17B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HIFS vs ONB

HIFS vs ONB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HIFS vs. ONB commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIFS is a Hold and ONB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (HIFS: $289.57 vs. ONB: $26.33)
Brand notoriety: HIFS and ONB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HIFS: 47% vs. ONB: 66%
Market capitalization -- HIFS: $636.13M vs. ONB: $10.17B
HIFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $636.13M. ONB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HIFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileONB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HIFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ONB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ONB is a better buy in the long-term than HIFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HIFS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HIFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ONB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ONB is a better buy in the short-term than HIFS.

Price Growth

HIFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.24% price change this week, while ONB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

ONB is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONB($10.2B) has a higher market cap than HIFS($636M). ONB has higher P/E ratio than HIFS: ONB (13.57) vs HIFS (12.69). ONB YTD gains are higher at: 19.450 vs. HIFS (2.703). ONB has more cash in the bank: 537M vs. HIFS (6.68M). HIFS has less debt than ONB: HIFS (1.41B) vs ONB (7.36B). ONB has higher revenues than HIFS: ONB (2.74B) vs HIFS (99.3M).
HIFSONBHIFS / ONB
Capitalization636M10.2B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.70319.45014%
P/E Ratio12.6913.5794%
Revenue99.3M2.74B4%
Total Cash6.68M537M1%
Total Debt1.41B7.36B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HIFS vs ONB: Fundamental Ratings
HIFS
ONB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8044
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9731
SMR RATING
1..100
6316
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9051
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ONB's Valuation (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HIFS (80) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for HIFS (97) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ONB’s stock grew significantly faster than HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIFS (63) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ONB’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HIFS (53) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIFS (90) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ONB’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HIFSONB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HIFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ONB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSVIX27.41N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Inst2
VEUPX210.96N/A
N/A
Vanguard European Stock Instl Plus
SIDRX15.74N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val SDR
MTISX25.78-0.15
-0.58%
NYLI Income Builder SIMPLE Class
JETNX19.53-0.14
-0.71%
Janus Henderson Global Sust Eq N

HIFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIFS has been loosely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HIFS jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIFS
1D Price
Change %
HIFS100%
-0.40%
BY - HIFS
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
ASB - HIFS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
SBCF - HIFS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
ONB - HIFS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
BUSE - HIFS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
More