HL
Price
$5.22
Change
-$0.41 (-7.28%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.01B
74 days until earnings call
PAAS
Price
$24.44
Change
-$1.06 (-4.16%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.59B
74 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HL vs PAAS

Header iconHL vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts HL vs PAASBanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$5.22
Change-$0.41 (-7.28%)
Volume$28.17M
Capitalization3.01B
Pan American Silver
Price$24.44
Change-$1.06 (-4.16%)
Volume$4.18M
Capitalization5.59B
HL vs PAAS Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HL vs. PAAS commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a Hold and PAAS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (HL: $5.63 vs. PAAS: $25.50)
Brand notoriety: HL and PAAS are both notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 163% vs. PAAS: 181%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. PAAS: $5.59B
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than HL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HL and PAAS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а -11.62% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

PAAS is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.10% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($5.59B) has a higher market cap than HL($3.01B). PAAS YTD gains are higher at: 26.113 vs. HL (14.664). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. HL (124M). PAAS has higher revenues than HL: PAAS (2.02B) vs HL (720M).
HLPAASHL / PAAS
Capitalization3.01B5.59B54%
EBITDA124M296M42%
Gain YTD14.66426.11356%
P/E Ratio1111.11N/A-
Revenue720M2.02B36%
Total Cash106MN/A-
Total Debt663MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
HL
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2374
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6076
SMR RATING
1..100
8989
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (15) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HL (40). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (76). This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (89) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (89). This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HL (52). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAAS (100). This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOTI33.370.25
+0.77%
VanEck Morningstar Intl Moat ETF
IBMO25.500.01
+0.03%
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bd ETF
IBDS24.03N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corp ETF
MSFD13.84-0.08
-0.57%
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X ETF
AHLT24.25-0.43
-1.75%
American Beacon AHL Trend ETF

PAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAAS
1D Price
Change %
PAAS100%
+4.85%
MAG - PAAS
86%
Closely correlated
+3.18%
AG - PAAS
84%
Closely correlated
+7.26%
HL - PAAS
83%
Closely correlated
+4.65%
SILV - PAAS
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
AEM - PAAS
79%
Closely correlated
-0.01%
More