Advertisement
HLF vs UTZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLF is a Hold and UTZ is a Hold.
HLF in upward trend: 10-day moving average crossed above 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026
The 10-day moving average for HLF crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 11 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on September 25, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on HLF as a result. In 56 of 82 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for HLF just turned positive on September 24, 2026. Looking at past instances where HLF's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 32 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
HLF moved above its 50-day moving average on October 01, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +9.06% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HLF advanced for three days, in 202 of 277 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where HLF declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
HLF broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 5 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 6 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 35 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (-4.328) is normal, around the industry mean (5.422). P/E Ratio (8.077) is within average values for comparable stocks, (32.504). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.120) is also within normal values, averaging (8.458). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.025) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.241) is also within normal values, averaging (4.925).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 41 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. HLF’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HLF’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock worse than average.
UTZ in +0.35% Uptrend, advancing for three consecutive days on October 08, 2026
Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where UTZ advanced for three days, in 166 of 270 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on September 10, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on UTZ as a result. In 51 of 90 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 106 of 176 cases where UTZ Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 60%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 13 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 47 of 65 cases where UTZ's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where UTZ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
UTZ broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 08, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 1 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 10 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. UTZ’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 93 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.815) is normal, around the industry mean (5.422). UTZ's P/E Ratio (769.000) is considerably higher than the industry average of (32.504). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.510) is also within normal values, averaging (8.458). Dividend Yield (0.018) settles around the average of (0.025) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.865) is also within normal values, averaging (4.925).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. UTZ’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock worse than average.
HLF | UTZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 10 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HLF's Valuation (35) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UTZ (93) in the null industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as UTZ (100) in the null industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's SMR Rating (6) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for UTZ (92) in the null industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew significantly faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.
UTZ's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as HLF (41) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to HLF’s over the last 12 months.
UTZ's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as HLF (5) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to HLF’s over the last 12 months.
| HLF | UTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 85% | 24 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 60% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while UTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- UTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UTZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HLF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +12.96% price change this week, while UTZ (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +0.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.96%.
Reported Earning Dates
HLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
UTZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-1.34% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
Advertisement
HLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLF has been loosely correlated with USNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLF jumps, then USNA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLF | 100% | +4.41% | ||
| USNA - HLF | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.41% | ||
| BGS - HLF | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
| CENT - HLF | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
| UTZ - HLF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NOMD - HLF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
More | ||||