ICE
Price
$161.25
Change
+$2.64 (+1.66%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
90.52B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MCO
Price
$503.32
Change
+$4.55 (+0.91%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
87.17B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ICE vs MCO

ICE vs MCO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ICE vs. MCO commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ICE is a Hold and MCO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (ICE: $161.25 vs. MCO: $503.32)
Brand notoriety: ICE and MCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ICE: 82% vs. MCO: 79%
Market capitalization -- ICE: $90.52B vs. MCO: $87.17B
ICE [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $90.52B. MCO’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $87.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $127.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $41.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ICE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ICE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the long-term than ICE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ICE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ICE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ICE and MCO are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ICE (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +4.21% price change this week, while MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +3.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +29.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

ICE is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

MCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+29.29% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICE($90.5B) and MCO($87.2B) have the same market capitalization . MCO has higher P/E ratio than ICE: MCO (31.94) vs ICE (22.74). ICE YTD gains are higher at: 0.254 vs. MCO (-0.816). ICE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.68B vs. MCO (4.36B). MCO has less debt than ICE: MCO (7.52B) vs ICE (20.5B). ICE has higher revenues than MCO: ICE (13.4B) vs MCO (8.16B).
ICEMCOICE / MCO
Capitalization90.5B87.2B104%
EBITDA7.68B4.36B176%
Gain YTD0.254-0.816-31%
P/E Ratio22.7431.9471%
Revenue13.4B8.16B164%
Total Cash2.62BN/A-
Total Debt20.5B7.52B273%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ICE vs MCO: Fundamental Ratings
ICE
MCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4512
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5854
SMR RATING
1..100
6015
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8578
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICE's Valuation (78) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (84) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that ICE’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ICE (58) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's SMR Rating (15) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICE (60) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICE’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ICE (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as ICE (85) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to ICE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ICEMCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ICE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRKR1.390.17
+13.93%
Marker Therapeutics
SGML11.971.24
+11.56%
Sigma Lithium Corp
IFS54.891.15
+2.14%
Intercorp Financial Services
BX143.382.03
+1.44%
Blackstone
DSP12.450.04
+0.32%
Viant Technology

ICE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICE has been loosely correlated with NDAQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICE jumps, then NDAQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICE
1D Price
Change %
ICE100%
+1.66%
NDAQ - ICE
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
SPGI - ICE
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
TW - ICE
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
MCO - ICE
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
TRU - ICE
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
More