IESC vs MTZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IESC is a Hold and MTZ is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IESC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- IESC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IESC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IESC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
IESC (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +2.10% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +3.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.59%.
Reported Earning Dates
IESC is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+1.97% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| IESC | MTZ | IESC / MTZ | |
| Capitalization | 5.4B | 11.3B | 48% |
| EBITDA | 314M | 907M | 35% |
| Gain YTD | 241.416 | 87.612 | 276% |
| P/E Ratio | 31.25 | 124.62 | 25% |
| Revenue | 2.76B | 12.2B | 23% |
| Total Cash | 44.9M | 181M | 25% |
| Total Debt | 38.7M | 2.73B | 1% |
IESC | MTZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IESC's Valuation (83) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (95). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (32). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's SMR Rating (27) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (85). This means that IESC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (37). This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTZ (100). This means that IESC’s stock grew significantly faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
| IESC | MTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 65% | 8 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 5 days ago 83% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VFMF | 137.90 | 1.94 | +1.43% |
| Vanguard US Multifactor ETF | |||
| FTA | 81.97 | 0.95 | +1.17% |
| First Trust Large Cap Val AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| SEPT | 30.69 | 0.11 | +0.35% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer10 Sep ETF | |||
| PSFJ | 29.21 | 0.05 | +0.15% |
| Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF | |||
| VWO | 45.40 | -0.16 | -0.35% |
| Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | |||
IESC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been loosely correlated with EME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then EME could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IESC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IESC | 100% | +1.83% | ||
| EME - IESC | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| PWR - IESC | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| MTZ - IESC | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| PRIM - IESC | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.53% | ||
| ROAD - IESC | 56% Loosely correlated | +6.07% | ||
More | ||||
MTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been loosely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | 100% | +0.88% | ||
| PWR - MTZ | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| IESC - MTZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| ACA - MTZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| PRIM - MTZ | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.53% | ||
| APG - MTZ | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.78% | ||
More | ||||