Advertisement
INSW vs TK
Which Stock Would AI Choose? International Seaways (INSW) vs. Teekay (TK) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both INSW and TK operate in the tanker shipping sector and have benefited from elevated spot rates driven by geopolitical disruptions in key waterways during recent market activity.
- INSW reported record Q2 2026 adjusted net income of $295 million ($5.91 per share) with a $5.05 per share dividend, reflecting strong free cash flow and a low net loan-to-value ratio of 6%.
- TK, through its significant stake in Teekay Tankers, posted solid consolidated results including $69.5 million net income in Q2 2026, supported by record rates for Suezmax and Aframax vessels and a robust cash position exceeding $1.2 billion at the subsidiary level.
- INSW maintains a more diversified fleet across VLCCs, Suezmaxes, and product tankers, while TK emphasizes fleet renewal and deleveraging with zero debt at the tanker subsidiary.
- Recent performance for both stocks shows resilience amid high Time Charter Equivalent (TCE) rates, though INSW has delivered larger per-share returns to shareholders via dividends in the latest quarter.
- Sector exposure remains similar, with market sentiment supported by ongoing supply constraints, though sustainability depends on freight rate stability.
Introduction
International Seaways (INSW) and Teekay (TK) represent two established players in the global tanker shipping industry, offering exposure to crude oil and refined petroleum product transportation. This comparison examines their business models, recent financial results, and market positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating relative performance within the energy transportation sector. Portfolio managers focused on cyclical shipping equities, income-oriented investors seeking dividend yields, and those monitoring geopolitical impacts on freight rates may find the analysis relevant for assessing trade-offs in liquidity, fleet strategy, and earnings volatility.
INSW Overview and Recent Performance
International Seaways, Inc. operates one of the larger independent tanker fleets, transporting crude oil and petroleum products across international flag routes with a mix of very large crude carriers (VLCCs), Suezmaxes, and medium-range product tankers. In recent weeks, the company delivered record financial results for the second quarter of 2026, including adjusted net income of $295 million ($5.91 per share) and adjusted EBITDA of $345 million, fueled by blended spot TCE rates reaching approximately $79,000 per day. Geopolitical tensions affecting vessel routing contributed to higher earnings and supported a historically large dividend declaration of $5.05 per share. The balance sheet remains strong with total liquidity of $935 million and a net loan-to-value ratio of 6%, while fleet expansion includes additional LR1 newbuildings. Stock price behavior has reflected these developments through upward momentum in recent market activity.
TK Overview and Recent Performance
Teekay Corporation provides marine transportation services primarily through its ownership interest in Teekay Tankers, focusing on crude oil and product tankers with emphasis on Suezmax and Aframax/LR2 segments. Recent quarterly results highlighted consolidated net income of $69.5 million for Q2 2026, alongside record adjusted net income at the tanker subsidiary level driven by Suezmax rates averaging $109,200 per day. The subsidiary maintained a debt-free position with cash exceeding $1.2 billion, supported by vessel sales and strong operating cash flow. Fleet renewal efforts include newbuilding contracts, while dividends remain steady at the subsidiary level. Broader market activity has shown price resilience for TK amid favorable rate environments, though exposure remains concentrated relative to more diversified peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section, based on metrics such as win rates, profit factors, and drawdown statistics that can range widely depending on strategy and timeframe. Bots feature diverse trading styles, time horizons, performance profiles, and ticker sets, allowing users to explore options suited to different risk tolerances and market views. Review the full collection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and live performance data.
Head-to-Head Comparison
International Seaways (INSW) and Teekay (TK) share core exposure to tanker freight rates but differ in scale and strategy. INSW offers broader diversification across vessel classes, potentially mitigating segment-specific volatility, whereas TK benefits from a streamlined focus on mid-sized tankers and a debt-free subsidiary balance sheet that enhances financial flexibility. Recent momentum favors both through elevated TCE rates, yet INSW has translated this into higher per-share shareholder distributions. Risk factors include rate cyclicality for each, with INSW carrying modest leverage and TK emphasizing asset sales for liquidity. Market sentiment remains constructive for the sector amid supply constraints, though INSW’s larger market capitalization and dividend yield provide distinct positioning compared to TK’s cash-centric profile.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as earnings consistency, dividend momentum, and relative balance sheet strength in the current environment, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to INSW over TK. Stronger per-share returns and fleet diversification support trend stability, while both entities benefit from sector tailwinds. This assessment reflects probabilistic evaluation rather than certainty and does not constitute investment guidance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INSW is a Buy and TK is a StrongBuy.
INSW | TK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 94 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INSW's Valuation (3) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TK (25). This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to TK’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TK (5). This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to TK’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's SMR Rating (27) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TK (38). This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to TK’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TK (37). This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to TK’s over the last 12 months.
TK's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as INSW (74). This means that TK’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.
| INSW | TK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 65% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INSW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while TK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- INSW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- TK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INSW’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- INSW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
INSW (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +8.02% price change this week, while TK (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +5.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
INSW is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
TK is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-2.16% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
Advertisement
INSW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INSW has been closely correlated with TNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INSW jumps, then TNK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INSW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSW | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| TNK - INSW | 86% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| TK - INSW | 82% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| DHT - INSW | 81% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| FRO - INSW | 81% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| TEN - INSW | 80% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||
TK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TK has been closely correlated with TNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TK jumps, then TNK could also see price increases.