IPAR
Price
$88.36
Change
-$3.39 (-3.69%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.94B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NUS
Price
$5.28
Change
-$0.32 (-5.71%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
271.88M
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPAR vs NUS

Header iconIPAR vs NUS Comparison
Open Charts IPAR vs NUSBanner chart's image
IPAR vs NUS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IPAR vs. NUS commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPAR is a Hold and NUS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2026
Stock price -- (IPAR: $91.75 vs. NUS: $5.60)
Brand notoriety: IPAR and NUS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IPAR: 91% vs. NUS: 123%
Market capitalization -- IPAR: $2.94B vs. NUS: $271.88M
IPAR [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $2.94B. NUS’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $271.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $327.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IPAR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNUS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IPAR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NUS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IPAR is a better buy in the long-term than NUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IPAR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NUS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IPAR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IPAR is a better buy in the short-term than NUS.

Price Growth

IPAR (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -1.00% price change this week, while NUS (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -3.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

IPAR is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

NUS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-2.75% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPAR($2.94B) has a higher market cap than NUS($272M). IPAR has higher P/E ratio than NUS: IPAR (17.41) vs NUS (5.19). IPAR YTD gains are higher at: 9.112 vs. NUS (-40.788). IPAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 305M vs. NUS (130M). IPAR has less debt than NUS: IPAR (183M) vs NUS (307M). IPAR (1.5B) and NUS (1.44B) have equivalent revenues.
IPARNUSIPAR / NUS
Capitalization2.94B272M1,080%
EBITDA305M130M235%
Gain YTD9.112-40.788-22%
P/E Ratio17.415.19336%
Revenue1.5B1.44B104%
Total Cash237MN/A-
Total Debt183M307M60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPAR vs NUS: Fundamental Ratings
IPAR
NUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1855
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76100
SMR RATING
1..100
4681
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5887
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8336
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NUS's Valuation (9) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as IPAR (19). This means that NUS’s stock grew similarly to IPAR’s over the last 12 months.

IPAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as NUS (100). This means that IPAR’s stock grew similarly to NUS’s over the last 12 months.

IPAR's SMR Rating (46) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NUS (81). This means that IPAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NUS’s over the last 12 months.

IPAR's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as NUS (87). This means that IPAR’s stock grew similarly to NUS’s over the last 12 months.

NUS's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPAR (83). This means that NUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPAR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPARNUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TABD24.980.08
+0.34%
Transamerica Bond Active ETF
MORT10.060.03
+0.30%
VanEck Mortgage REIT Income ETF
MUSE49.62N/A
N/A
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF
PCM5.68N/A
-0.06%
PCM Fund
NVG12.64-0.01
-0.08%
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund

NUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NUS has been loosely correlated with SPB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NUS jumps, then SPB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NUS
1D Price
Change %
NUS100%
-0.53%
SPB - NUS
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.70%
IPAR - NUS
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
ELF - NUS
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
ACU - NUS
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
MAGN - NUS
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
More