RJF
Price
$169.30
Change
+$3.16 (+1.90%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
32.52B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STT
Price
$185.40
Change
+$1.19 (+0.65%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
50.93B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RJF vs STT

RJF vs STT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RJF vs. STT commentary
Jul 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RJF is a Buy and STT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (RJF: $169.30 vs. STT: $185.40)
Brand notoriety: RJF and STT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RJF: 78% vs. STT: 72%
Market capitalization -- RJF: $32.52B vs. STT: $50.93B
RJF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $32.52B. STT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $50.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $163.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTT’s FA Score has 5 green FA rating(s).

  • RJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STT’s FA Score: 5 green, 0 red.
According to our system of comparison, STT is a better buy in the long-term than RJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RJF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RJF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the short-term than STT.

Price Growth

RJF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.56% price change this week, while STT (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

RJF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

STT is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.16% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STT($50.9B) has a higher market cap than RJF($32.5B). STT has higher P/E ratio than RJF: STT (16.36) vs RJF (14.76). STT YTD gains are higher at: 46.343 vs. RJF (6.554). STT has more cash in the bank: 6.52B vs. RJF (2.61B). RJF has less debt than STT: RJF (4.22B) vs STT (29.2B). RJF (14.5B) and STT (14.5B) have equivalent revenues.
RJFSTTRJF / STT
Capitalization32.5B50.9B64%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.55446.34314%
P/E Ratio14.7616.3690%
Revenue14.5B14.5B100%
Total Cash2.61B6.52B40%
Total Debt4.22B29.2B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RJF vs STT: Fundamental Ratings
RJF
STT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5821
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2610
SMR RATING
1..100
1513
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
485
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6026
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STT's Valuation (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RJF (71) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than RJF’s over the last 12 months.

STT's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RJF (26) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

STT's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RJF (15) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

STT's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RJF (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than RJF’s over the last 12 months.

STT's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RJF (60) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than RJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RJFSTT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AJG247.775.56
+2.30%
Arthur J Gallagher & Co
MSLE9.780.16
+1.66%
Satellos Bioscience Inc
BCO122.000.91
+0.75%
Brink's Company (The)
MGTX11.77-0.33
-2.73%
MeiraGTx Holdings plc
CYN1.08-0.04
-3.57%
Cyngn Inc.

RJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RJF
1D Price
Change %
RJF100%
+1.90%
SF - RJF
87%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
MS - RJF
82%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
EVR - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
GS - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
PIPR - RJF
78%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
More